So, I was in agreement that a male-to-female fighter should not be fighting against natural born women, but this throws a wrench in the works of my thought process...
This is a post on a popular website regarding Fallon's previous opponent, who is much more "masculine" than Ms. Fox appears to be. But then again, Fox beat her in :39 seconds.
It doesn't necessarily answer any questions, but it does(to me) show that previously being a man doesn't automatically give any distinct physical advantages.
Just thought I would throw this out there for anyone who was involved in this weeks conversation about if she should be allowed to compete WMMA.