Hey just wanted to get some feedback on what people thought about Round 2 for Falcao vs Sprang. I have recently adjusted my judging style to incorporate 10-8 rounds more, and Rd 2, I definitely felt warranted a 10-8 round. I don't think you need to nearly kill the guy to warrant a 10-8 round. It does help of course though.
Personally, I think a 10-8 round is warranted when complete domination is showed, with little to no fighting back from the fighter on the defending side. Also, I would think some decent damage is required of course, and Falcao qualified for that IMO. Little baby Sherk punches or Guida shoulder punches wouldn't warrant a 10-8 IMO, if that's all they did.
But if your positionally controlling an opponent, and beating the shit out of him as well, I think that warrants a 10-8. Or at least I feel so right now.
Rd 3 is a perfect example of a 10-9 . Falcao dominated majority of the round, but Sprang had a couple of moments when he made a push and was active.
Anyway would like some feedback on that.