Preliminary CBS ratings for Strikeforce: 'Fedor vs Rogers' averages 3.79 million viewers

The preliminary ratings for the CBS broadcast of Strikeforce: "Fedor vs. Rogers" returned an estimated 3.79 million viewers for the prime time mixed martial arts event.
The 1.7 rating share for "Saturday Night Fights" was enough to reach number one in several key demographics; however, it did fall short of the high water mark set by YouTube sensation-turned Ultimate Fighter Kimbo Slice, who reached as high as 4.8 million viewers and 3.0 rating share on Elite XC: "Prime Time" back in May 2008.
Still, Strikeforce and CBS can raise those preliminary numbers significantly. The main event of the evening, which the entire Nov. 7 card was based and marketed around, was not included in the estimate because it didn't get underway until 11:01 p.m. and therefore was not counted.
The final numbers that include the two rounds of action from "Fedor vs. Rogers" will be available Tuesday.
Here's a snapshot of the quarterly breakdown, courtesy of TV by the Numbers:
9:00 p.m. – Viewers: 3.50 million (#4), Adults 18-49: 1.5 (#3)
9:30 p.m. – Viewers: 3.53 million (#4), Adults 18-49: 1.6 (#2)
10:00 p.m. – Viewers: 4.12 million (#3), Adults 18-49: 1.9/ 6 (#1)
10:30 p.m. – Viewers: 4.01 million (#3), Adults 18-49: 1.8/ 6 (#1)
Considering this card was promoted exclusively around the main event between Brett Rogers and Fedor Emelianenko, it's not unreasonable to think these numbers could spike for the main event, effectively raising the overall totals like it did for the previous CBS/MMA offering by Elite XC.
Whether or not you classify these numbers as a success or as a failure largely depends on what side of the fence you're on, but considering the top-heavy nature of this card, I would think it falls somewhere in between those two ends of the spectrum.
Stay tuned to MMAmania.com for the final numbers this Tuesday (Nov. 10). In the meantime, you can get yourself up to speed on all the action from last Saturday here and here.
0 recs |
156 comments
Comments
CBS should have aired it live in all timezones
by Jimbob on Nov 9, 2009 12:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Saturday night’s Strikeforce event was very entertaining. If they keep it up, they are going to continue to be profitable and will attract even more top level fighters. Being able to share fighters with Dream will also help keep the fights diverse and competitive. The UFC is still the number 1 MMA organization, but Strikeforce may give them a run for their money. I bet Dana White is a bit concerned about the success of Strikeforce and is re-thinking some of his hardball tactics with television networks and other MMA organizations. If he wants to continue to be number 1, he may need to learn to be more flexible and cooperate with others. The UFC’s near monopoly appears to be over.
by DrPepper on Nov 9, 2009 2:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I expected this show to do double those numbers, but then, I expected Strikeforce to ADVERTISE more. I watch CBS almost every night during primetime and only saw ONE commercial for this fight. They really dropped the ball on getting the word out. This was the biggest card ever on network TV and none of my friends who are casual fight-fans even knew it was happening. None of them watched and they still don’t know who Fedor is. It’s absurd that the best fighter in the world fights on NETWORK TV and does less numbers than an MMA reality show on an obscure Cable network. That just shows what a pathetic job SF did of advertising.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ya but it also says how stupid some/ alot people are that would rather see a youtube seansation bearded guy fight than an Elite mma fighter, I mean look at all the free fights UFC has put on spike with advertising and people know its happening kimbo still gets more rating some how it just pisses me off
by Nor Cal Mexican on Nov 9, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I agree nor cal mexican. It shows how many people really have no clue about MMA
by RedDog on Nov 10, 2009 7:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t believe Strikeforce will give the UFC a run for their money but I would like to see them co-exist with the UFC. It’s nice to consider the possibility of being a second major MMA show in North America that will put on consistent shows that aren’t purely reliant on some sort of gimmick. Some might say that they’re using Fedor as a gimmick but the fact is we wins fights with skill, standing or on the ground, every fight.
by Goatboy on Nov 9, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure if the ratings count dvr’s but mine recorded 2 hrs then stoped, my satelite company had it listed as a 2 hr show. Exactly when Fedor and Bret were about to go.
by Ro-J on Nov 9, 2009 8:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Same for Verizon FIOS. At 11pm, I started watching the DVR’d event from the beginning, but then thought, “WEC and UFC-Spike events almost always go over… maybe I should just check.” Sure enough! That’s right when Fedor v Rogers was being introduced. So, I started recording again for 30 minutes. Just managed to record that fight. If I hadn’t checked, I’d have been screwed, too.
by MMACrossfire on Nov 9, 2009 8:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Always record an hour after a live event or whatever is on after the Kimbo fight CBS had was the same thing.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 9:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly Puck, I ALWAYS record an extra hour for all live events – even the 6 hr HDnet cards. But for WEC, I tend to record 2 hours over because sometimes they say its a 2 hr event, but it ends up being a 3hr one that runs over. It hasn’t happened lately, but you are always better safe than sorry.
by ViolentMike on Nov 9, 2009 9:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think its totally hilarious that the number of viewers dropped between 10-10:30 which is EXACTLY when jake shields TERRIBLE fight was going on hahah that is freaking hilarious….throughout the night the viewers kept rising and rising…till the jake shields fight…then the viewership dropped….hahahahha…seems as if the mainstream america viewership tuned over to watch the nogs/randy fight which was going on at the same time on spike…hahahha
by HellaHectic on Nov 9, 2009 12:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
funny…Miller is starting to get on my nerves…he should change up his routine a bit…maybe try being serious just some of the time…Shields would get worked at 185 by MANY MW’s in the UFC…Jake also tends to move like a striking stick figure…he’s flat footed
by McArthur on Nov 9, 2009 1:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shields tries to finish and go for subs against guys who can’t handle him on the mats but as soon as he faces someone with a decent game, he goes into Arona mode.
by NameNotRequired on Nov 9, 2009 2:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
NNR: TRUE THAT! Then again, I always thought of him more as a positional grappler then a submmission master.
Sheilds better fake an injury and take some time off so he can hold on to the title for a little, because he has NO SHOT at beating Jacre. HOw can Shields beat a better grappler, who is more athletic and explosive then him? HE DOESNT!!! That MW title wont find a home until in lands on Jacre’s waste.
Does anyone think sheilds would outgrapple Maia in a ground war? FOCK NO! So how is he supposed to beat Jacre?
HE WONT!!!
Very pleased to see that this card was a rating success. Around 4 million viewers? Not bad for an unmarketable fighter that no one knows!! hahahahaha
by john G on Nov 9, 2009 8:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also Jacare has better striking. Can’t wait until he wipes that dumb grin off his face. Until then i’ll say he taps lindland with another armbar quick in the 1st. As far as the ratings though what if shields killed it outright with his borefest and the numbers turn out to be lower than the 10:30 slot? We can all say one thing is for sure – CBS is done letting jake stink up their shows, they’ll straight Okami him if he ever gets on there.
by NameNotRequired on Nov 9, 2009 8:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I REALLY wish there was like 10 more seconds left in the 3rd round. Mayhem had that choke in DEEP and 5 more seconds and Shields would have been napping. Jake had Mayhem’s back or had him mounted for probably 12 minutes and I don’t believe he attempted a single submission and he also hit Mayhem like a 12 year old girl with marshmallow gloves.. Mayhem had Jake’s back for about 20 seconds and almost choked him out.
In Japan, Mayhem would have been given the decision because he was the fighter trying to finish the fight.
I had a Gegard/Fedor/Miller parlay that would have payed out very nicely.
by ViolentMike on Nov 9, 2009 9:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
john, of course everyone is going to tune in for their first taste of free Fedor, the question is will they continue to tune in to watch him fight more cans?
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
John G, are you implying that Souza is a better grappler than Maia?
The problem is, Sheilds isn’t really a MW at all. He should be fighting at WW. I’d like to see how his grappling stacks up to Fitch or Kos.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 10:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I am implying that jZacre is just as good of s grappler as Maia. I think they are the best 2 in the world. jacre is the mnore explosive athlete though.
by john G on Nov 9, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I haven’t seen enough of Souza to render an informed opinion about whether or not he’s as skilled as Maia, but I definitely agree that he’s more explosive, from the few fights I’ve seen, I’d say he’s much more exiting to watch. Maia reminds me too much of Royce.
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 7:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Miller was acting ‘stupid’ with his intro’ not as bad as Phil Baroni, but notheless ‘pitiful’… I’m glad D. White excludes those dumb intro’s by the fighers and keeps us selectively entertained with camera’s on the ring girls, the UFC could use a little more of that though! : )
by DAVE A on Nov 9, 2009 3:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I always thoroughly enjoy Mayhem’s entrances.
by ViolentMike on Nov 9, 2009 9:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, Dave, he looked like a total spasmodic ass in that intro…but then it’s hard to hide the truth.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If he had spent a little more time training and less time rehearsing his Dancing with the Stars audition he might have fared better in his fight.
by PW on Nov 9, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t believe no one jumped on John’s spelling of waist. Are we that used to college graduates not knowing how to spell lose or waist? Just busting balls john!
by kevin on Nov 9, 2009 7:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im sure sheilds vs mayhem didnt help those numbers! lol
by ItsNormlToSmokePot on Nov 9, 2009 12:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Actually I think miller was pretty crowd pleasing this night and am sure he made a couple new fans, thats what ppl who r new to mma wanna see. Colorful exciting fighters/fights
by Hex on Nov 9, 2009 1:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No, that’s what WWE fans want to see…and that’s where Mayhem belongs.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 10:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the numbers fell during the Shields/Miller fight. I actually enjoyed the fight for a while, but I knew that Shields was never going to get off the submission. The only time the fight got exciting was when Miller actually took Jake’s back. Too bad the time ran out. I wanted to see if Shields could escape the position, or if Miller could get the sub. The rest of the fight was basically Shields getting the takedown and the dominant position, but coming up short on the sub attempts- rinse, repeat. I think the number will top out for the Fedor fight, but I don’t think they will be overwhelming. Regardless of what some people may think, Fedor is not a huge draw in North America.
by naturalshadow on Nov 9, 2009 4:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and he never will be if Strikeforce doesn’t get their marketing team off its ass.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
mcarthur shields pulled a maynard…wut the hell did you expect mayhem to do???i was impressed my mayhem considering shields technique..didnt get frustrated kept his composure…in my book i dont give shields this win…nor do i give maynard his wins when they do that…imo fighters that gray n pray should b deducted points if they stall for too long…idk how you guys feel about that but thats what i think they should do
by hehehe hahaha on Nov 9, 2009 2:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
NO’ they should just be stood up sooner, a time limit should be set or something ., take a guy down u have 1 minute to actively finish him. If an MMA figher can’t defend takedown after takedown, too bad, go back to the practice room and figure it out.
by DAVE A on Nov 9, 2009 3:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Shields had been sitting in Miller’s full guard the whole time I would agree. But he was constantly working his way to dominant positions, and you can’t stnad guys up when one has a dominant position and is working. Shields punches like he has wet noodle arms and marshmallow fists, and Miller has a good ground game, making this fight very unlikely to end. I strongly disagree with anyone who labels this a LnP clinic, a la Huggie Bear Guida.
by PW on Nov 9, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We should rate for the Fedor ratings before we make the final call. I think it taught them not to put shields on TV again, but I commend them on putting REAL fights and not basing their whole org around Kimbo.
by Bill Maher on Nov 9, 2009 2:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I believe cbs will pull over 5 mil for the main event
did you guys hear the ovation fedor recieved, all the [us fans dont know or care about fedor talk] is over and pure BS now. he has faught three times in the us and each time came through in spectacular fashion a 39 sec submision, a first rd knockout and a second round tko
Fedor has the same ora that tyson had and I thouroughly enjoyed watching him knock rogers senseless. As I explained to my dad how this guy has never been beaten and how hes the best in the world
I watched the fight again and that fight was action packed from bell to bell and in my opinion should be considered for fight of the year right along with sanchez/guida and for those of you who believe fedor was losing on the scorecard your crazy fedor secured 2 takedowns and attempted two subs and landed a left bomb in the 1st while roger landed 1 jab and three effective shots from the guard.
I cant wait to watch fedor in action again
by dia mette on Nov 9, 2009 2:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It was a good tko but not even in the top 20 fights of the year
by PanicZoo on Nov 9, 2009 2:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
of course not the top 20 all belong to ufc. right fanboy?
by big bo on Nov 9, 2009 7:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dia Mietter: strongly agree with your post.
I was watching the event with friends I recently converted to mma fans, and they were VERY entertained by the FEDOR fight. One of the best fights of the year by FAR!
Ko of the year along side Hendo/Bisping.
awesome top level Heavyweight cLASH!
by john G on Nov 9, 2009 8:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure about KO of the year. Hornbuckle kicking Gono unconcious for about
by ViolentMike on Nov 9, 2009 9:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
10 minutes was sick. Marius Zaromskis has had some sick KO’s as well this year.
Hendo takes the cake for the Bis KO.
But when Fedor hit Rogers, it sounded like a concrete cinderblock falling from a 20 story building landing on the pavement. SO loud. Loved the mics on the refs.
by ViolentMike on Nov 9, 2009 9:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly the Hendo KO was the best KO of the year it’s going to be hard beat that one.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The other 2 Fedor fights that took place in the US were PPV. Those PPV’s had very poor numbers. This was the first fight most North American fans have seen him in and he looked average against a fat guy with no skills. I think that speaks poorly of Fedor the Great!
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m afraid you may have a point there, jay. To first-timers tuning in to their first MMA fight, this was just two fat guys in a brawl. I think their physiques probably hurt the marketing because the average American’s think that you have to be cut like a boxer to be a serious fighter. They haven’t seen flabby guys destroy pretty-boy body-builders like we have. To them, this just looked like a fight between two out-of-shape bouncers. It’s too bad Fedor/Arlovski wasn’t on Network TV. That would’ve attracted a lot more viewers I think, including a large female audience since Arlovski looks like one of those models on the cover of romance novels.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha I just had to respond because I felt bad. I don’t think anyone else is going to reply to your Fedor bashing. Don’t give up though make sure you do it on every post somebody besides me might see it!! You can do it!!
by Kayo on Nov 9, 2009 11:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Kayo, thanks. I’m not bashing Fedor though. Just his blind fans and the cans he fights.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Rogers and Werdum or any other mismatch they decide to throw at him. Maybe Cans is inappropriate and mismatch is a better word. I want to see him fight someone where he is less than a 6 to 1 favorite. Don’t you? Or is padding an already padded record what you are into?
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
everyone he fights will be the underdog, werdum and overeem won’t be as big of one as rogers just cause he was more unknown but he might have proved to be tougher than then.even brock would be the underdog if they fought.
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 12:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
AHHH. Yes Roy but Brock would not be a 6 to 1 underdog with only a punchers chance. Also Werdum would be a bigger dog than Rogers was. Overeem although would make a better fight, but I am not in suspense as to who would win that fight. I guess what I am saying that unless he fights Brock or Shane right now I won’t be excited to see him fight. At least against those two he has more than one way to lose and losing would be a good possibility.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That is dumb. Shane Carwin would be handled just like Rogers, Carwin is just as amateur with his striking. He would be as easily handled as you mother on saturday night in one of those white trash bars she likes to be in. Jay get off of Dana’s d i c k. Brock is the only Heavyweight in the UFC that Can probably beat Fedor.
by zack on Nov 9, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
brock or shane? shane has one win against gonzaga who werdum tko’ed twice, werdum is better than shane or rogers.
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
MMA math does not apply. Brock Lesnar is the only UFC HW with the skill set to beat Fedor. Before all you Fedor-hugging trolls start screaming, I said Brock has the physical skills necessary to win. That doesn’t mean he absolutely would win, just that he has the best chance of any current UFC or SF HW.
by PW on Nov 9, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shane’s record isn’t any better than Rogers. In fact, given that Gonzaga was schooling Shane before he bit the big one, and Rogers easily beat AA who was higher ranked than Gonzo, I’d say Rogers’ posed more of a threat to Fedor than Shane would have.
Essentially, Jay, what you’re saying (over and over and over again) is that if Fedor doesn’t go to the UFC and fight Brock, he’s ducking and padding his record. But you could just as easily say the same thing about Brock, that if he doesn’t go to SF and fight Fedor, Barnett, Rogers, Overeem, Silva…etc, that he’s not a real champ cause he won’t fight the best. I think Fedor, Bigfoot, and Barnett are the 3 guys in the world with the best chance of beating Lesnar. And none of them are in the UFC. So it’s Lesnar who isn’t fighting the competition that could threaten him. Carwin’s the only contender in the UFC That Lesnar doesn’t have 50 lbs and a big reach advantage over. He’s the heavy favorite against anyone in the UFC, so why don’t you accuse him of padding his record? If Rogers is a can, Carwin would have to be too.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Before all you Fedor-hugging trolls
i know your not referring to me!
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rogers and Carwin are both great up and coming dangerous fighters that are unknown how good they are Rogers answered a lot of questions about his ground game and did a good job against Fedor Carwin will be taking on Brock and should be tested himself. any wich way you put it they are exciting HW to watch in MMA period.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
why should Brock have to go to a lesser organization to fight Fedor? That’s like someone from the Toronto Argonauts calling out the New England Patriots.
by PW on Nov 9, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, PW, not even sure what sport that is you’re talking about, but unless the Argonauts have 3 or 4 of the TOP 10 players in the sport, including the consensus #1, then I don’t think your comparisson is valid.
Puck, I wasn’t saying I think Rogers & Carwin are cans, I was responding to Jay’s insistence that Rogers is a can and Fedor won’t fight top talent, by demonstrating that Carwin and Rogers are at the same level. IOW, Fedor is facing equal talent outside the UFC as he would face in the UFC. I was just challenging his double standard when it comes to Fedor.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was the only Canadian football team I could think of.
by PW on Nov 9, 2009 4:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
shonuff Rogers yeah he can be debated as being equal talent but I can’t see to many other strikeforce fighters beating Rogers little alone Fedor hopefully AA fights Werdum and then the winner of that gets a shot at Fedor and the WAMMA belt should be on the line LOL.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Strikeforce shouldn’t be blamed for not having anyone who can beat Fedor. A year ago, nobody thought the UFC had anyone who could beat Fedor either.
As for Rogers, I think he should fight Bigfoot. I don’t know what happened to Bigfoot in this last fight and why he suddenly stopped punching (maybe broke his hand) but he was spanking Werdum for the first round and a half and I think he could give Rogers a run for his money. I also think he’s the biggest threat to Brock. He’s the only guy bigger than Brock who also has skills. He’s got heavy hands, great jits creds, and a lot more experience than Brock, Rogers, or Carwin. I’m not saying I’d put money on him, but I think he’s got the right combination of size and skill to give Brock more trouble than anyone else out there.
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 8:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i have to correct myself… its his fourth time fighting in the U.S. forgot about the Pride bout which also ended with a spectacular submision finish
by dia mette on Nov 9, 2009 2:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you explain to your dad how the best in the world doesn’t fight the best competition in the world, or for the best organization. He may have had trouble understanding that. Usually when someone is the best in the world, you don’t have to explain anything.
by naturalshadow on Nov 9, 2009 4:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, idiot. Fedor has dominated some of the most credited fighters in MMA. If you knew a thing or two about the sport – perhaps if you hit the mat yourself – you’d be familiar with names like Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira… If Fedor is not the best, please be so kind and tell us all who is. :)
by Azazel on Nov 9, 2009 6:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly Azazel, Fedor has more wins over UFC HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONS and TOP 3s than “UFC No 1 Contender” Carwin has against cans. Brock has exactly TWO wins over TOP 10s. Nog is by far the best HW in the UFC and Fedor has already beaten him twice. Fedor’s last 3 victims were all TOP 10. How is he not fighting “the best”? The only “greats” he hasn’t beaten are Randy Couture and Juice Barnett and he tried to fight both those guys but was blocked by their legal problems. The only other fighter anyone could possibly claim is “the best” is Lesnar, who’s got a 3-1 pro record, compared to Fedors 30-0. Fedor is clearly the best in the world. Why aren’t people screaming that Brock is a coward for not going to SF to fight “the best”? Why? Because they’ve been drinking Dana’s magic cool-aid!
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Azazel, are you implying that people can’t know anything about MMA while thinking that Fedor is currently fighting bums? What does beating AA, Timmay and that fat gas attendant do for him?
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It shows he can still beat the shit out of TOP 10 Heavyweights, that’s what! Sylvia and Arlovski were so mentally rattled after their fights with Sylvia that they screwed up big time in their next fights. That doesn’t take anything away from what he did to them, or the fact that they were both TOP 5 at the time. And if Rogers were in the UFC, he’d be in the TOP 5.
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Azazel- I am not some kid just getting into the sport, and probably “hit the mat” when you where still waiting on pubes.
I agree that Fedor is the best heavyweight, at this moment in time, but he is not the “best in the world”. In those 30 wins, you have a lot of cans and past their prime fighters. That is not Fedor’s fault, but it is the truth. Yes, he has beaten a lot of UFC heavyweight champs, but who were they?
Big Tim- Honestly, did anyone ever think he had an ounce of talent?
Arlovski- This one I give Fedor credit for. Besides a terrible chin, he is legit. Maybe Fedor’s 2nd best win.
Coleman- Past his prime. Not a great heavyweight to begin with, but he fought in the early days.
Mark Kerr- Biggest waste of talent in mma history. Drug Addict.
Big Nog, CroCop, and Arlovski are his best wins. Brock has only had 5 fights, but his top 3 fights are actually comparable to Fedor’s. Not saying Brock is the best, but I do think he has a good chance of taking Fedor.
Still, I agree that Fedor is the best heavyweight in mma. I also think that the heavyweight division, as a whole, is the worst in mma. If you want me to give my opinion on who is the “best in mma”, I would say it would have to be someone who dominates in a better division, against tougher opponents. GSP and Anderson Silva certainly come to mind, and I think Anderson would also be able to beat Fedor, regardless of what weight they fought at. It may be a bit soon, but you can also make an argument for Lyoto Machida.
by naturalshadow on Nov 9, 2009 4:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My mistake, he never fought Kerr, not sure why I thought he did? I didn’t add Nog because he never technically had the UFC belt, but I did mention that he was one of his best opponents.
by naturalshadow on Nov 9, 2009 5:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Kerr never had the UFC belt either. Was wondering why you mentioned him.
Say what you want about TIM SYLVIA, but he was the best Heavyweight the UFC had for a long time. He beat Arlovski twice, plus Monson and RICCO RODRIGUEZ (who was UFC champ and consensus #1 at the time coming off 11 straight wins incl. Couture, Arlovki, Monson, Buentello, TK, Petey Williams.
Obviously you’re right about the HW division being historically weak, esp in the UFC since PRIDE and AFFLICTION were both Heavyweight focussed and had better guys.
I disagree with your assessment of Fedor’s win over Coleman. The Coleman of PRIDE was better than the Coleman who was UFC champ. Don’t forget he won the PRIDE Grand Prix AFTER retiring from UFC and was considered by many to be the favorite the first time he fought Fedor.
I also think Brock has a good chance of beating Fedor, but that doesn’t change the fact that Fedor has fought and beaten more of the top heavyweights in the world than anyone else. In fact nobody else even comes close. Which is why it pisses me off so much when these Dana nuthuggers say Fedor doesn’t fight the best because he’s not fighting in UFC, as if the guys Brock is fighting are better than the guys Fedor’s beaten. Brock still has yet to face the best Heavyweight in the UFC (Nog) a guy Fedor has already beaten twice. None of these up-n-comers that these newbie fanboys are drooling after (Cain, JDS, Carwin) are in the same league as NOG, so really what has Fedor got to prove? Jay says the guys Fedor fights are no threat to him. But who is besides Brock? And for all his talent and scariness, Brock has yet to accomplish anything near what Fedor has. I believe Brock represents the FUTURE of MMA HWs, but he still has some catching up to do to claim he’s the best in the PRESENT, and he’s the one who still has something to prove, and whose claim to the throne will not be legit till he beats Fedor or Fedor retires or starts losing. And even when/if he beats Fedor, it will always be tainted by the fact that he’s 50 lbs bigger, enough for 3 regular weight classes. Even if he loses to Brock, Fedor will still be remembered as the better fighter.
Personally, the fight I most want to see in MMA is Fedor vs Anderson. I don’t know why people think its fair for Fedor to have to defend his legacy against a guy 50 lbs bigger but not fair for Anderson to fight a guy who’s 15 lbs bigger!!! WTH???
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 9:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of Kerr…what the hell happened to him? Back in the day he won his first 12 fights and was considered the next-gen Coleman (basically what Brock is now.)
I just looked him up and he’s lost 10 of his last 12 fights!!! Talk about a fall from grace! How does he still get work?
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He got messed up on drugs for a while. HBO did a documentary on him called “The Smashing Machine”. HUGE fall from grace. He looked to be a real world beater, but now he is extremely out of shape, and can’t get a win to save his life.
by naturalshadow on Nov 10, 2009 11:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So the UFC has all the best heavyweights? I would bet money that Fedor, Rogers or even Overeem would destroy the majority of them. Rogers showed that he has a ground game against Fedor and isn’t all about the stand-up. lets see what the UFC has -
Brock – Difficult for anyone but beatable, UFC’s best at present (poss tied with Nog). Chin not tested properly but doesn’t like getting hit, submission possibilities but hey, he’s only had a few fights against an ever ageing Randy (who did well against him), Mir x 2 (even outcomes and Mir was a dick by trying to bulk up against him, should have worked on speed and movement for 2nd fight) and Herring who’s eye socket he broke with the first punch yet still couldn’t finish. The hype may be a little premature at the moment.
Cain – Chin suspect, shaken by Kongo multiple times but with no ground game couldn’t survive the wrestling, definitely beatable.
Kongo – Stand-up is his only game, a game which both Overeem and Rogers could beat him at, Fedor absolutely.
Carwin – similar to Rogers really, hard to call until more fights under his belt.
Nog – Beaten by Fedor already but still very relevant, probably tied with Brock for UFC’s best.
Dos Santos/Cro Cop – neither impressed in their last bout, both would be beat by Fedor/Overeem/Rogers in my opinion.
Mir – well who knows really, patchy with potential but never stays consistent.
So the UFC has some good guys, but so do other promotions, to be saying Brock/Carwin are the best is totally premature given the fights they’ve had. Fedor is still the most vicious striker out there, not due to his size but the sheer force and aggression he puts into each punch and his ground game has never been bettered – even by Nog. He’s still number one I’m afraid and others should chase him, he doesn’t have to go after anyone as he’s beaten a who’s who of the top fighters from the past 10 years. Get over it, the UFC isn’t the be all and end all of MMA.
by Jimrod on Nov 9, 2009 7:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Please dont forget other Top Notch Heavy Weights Such as (from the ufc’s website roster):
Mostapha Al Turk: Cant beat a mentally raped Cro Cop
Pat Barry: Zero Ground Game
Paul Buentello: Has a great jab but slightly over the hill
Mike Ciesnolevicz: Who?
Mirko Cro Cop: Currently Suicidal
Todd Duffee: Huge, Powerful, completely untested
Justin Eilers: Lost to every big name he has ever fought
Zane Frazier: He needs to win a fight first
Gabriel Gonzaga: A beast but very inconsistant
ETC…
They have a lot and I could keep going. SF as only a few fighters but the ones they have could beat a great deal of the UFC’s roster. Lets not act like they have a deep line up of world beaters. I hope that Fedor does one day go to the UFC or the best fighters end up coming to him. But for now, War Fedor
__
Uh…you know that Eilers is dead, right?
-JH
by HOC on Nov 9, 2009 10:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh and dont forget Tim Hague. Best Fighter ever to step foot in the UFC. And because he is in the UFC that now means no fighter from any other organization stands a chance. War “The Thrashing Machine”.
by HOC on Nov 9, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jim-Rod, you hold Rogers pretty high up there. He hadn’t fought anyone before Fedor, he has zero ground game, zero technical stand-up and no real background to speak of. To think he would beat Kongo, Carwin and Dos Santos is laughable. Keep on loving SF right now though, they won’t be around long enough to do it later.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There is also Yvel he is allowed to at least fight one fight and as long as he doesn’t do anything stupid he will be allowed to fight more.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL I didnt know he was dead. I bet he could still woop some ass, he is still technically on the UFC roster and therefor could beat anyone from SF.
by HOC on Nov 9, 2009 11:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
HOC, so you basically went and copy, pasted the list and added a bunch of mindless dribble to it? Yeah you are the guy I’ll be asking MMA questions to.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How did you not know he was dead? This wasn’t exactly kept a secret.
by naturalshadow on Nov 9, 2009 4:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL, good point HOC! So what if he’s dead…if Dana still has him on the UFC roster, he must still be better than Fedor. Eilers probably KOd Lucifer in the first round and has Jesus in a kneebar even as we speak. Cause we all know if Jesus could really live up to his hype, he’d already be in the UFC, right!
by shonuff on Nov 9, 2009 6:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ahahah stuff like that dont matter anymore,. i give it a yr before strikeforce has a decent roster to compete with UFC, UFC is not gonna be the top dog anymore. if strike force can pull those sort of numbers every month they will get alot more exposure and will naturally grow, add this is the contracts with dream etc to bring fighters over from japan
And imo Rogers is a damn lot better than carwin, and prob hits alot harder than him or brocks master bate punches(also brock aint KO anyone), so i have no doubt in my mind now even if fedor went to UFC he would walk through all their top dogs,
i wud of loved to of seen dana’s reaction watching this fight….
by CoNr on Nov 9, 2009 8:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. Everyone argued when I said Affliction was going to die before they held 4 shows. I am saying this again, when you make DW mad you don’t stay in business. SF will be gone in less than 3 years. I talked to a lot of people who watch UFC around the office, and they all hated the SF show. They are laughing at me for thinking Fedor is #1 HW. The casual fans who finally got to see Fedor Saturday night all think he is over rated. He messed up big in this fight and he is well on his way to killing another promotion. 2-3 years tops and SF is gone. Most fans don’t have enough time to keep up with more than one organization. Before you flame me and say I work with idiots, just keep in mind this is Joe Public and they make hasty judgements without taking the time to do the research. Another sure sign that this is over soon, did you guys see Jerry Millen in the ring after the fight too? The guy is like the plague, kills everything he touches.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
there is a massive diff in SF and affliction,
• SF was already established before they signed Fedor
• SF has a Network TV deal where affliction was PPV
• Affliction payed out huge sums of money to the fighters which SF is a bit more careful with.
• Pretty sure Scott Coker has seen what happened to Elite XC and Affliction and has made sure he wont make same mistakes
the list goes on and on
The main reason i think UFC may no longer be top in next few yrs, is that they held the monopoly on MMA in North America ( and europe i guess), now with SF and to lesser Extent Bellator ( who i believe now have an english TV deal rather than just Spanish or vice versa) the UFC is coming off as the posh older brother who you need to splash out $50 ( dunno price in states as im in uk) to watch, where the average Joe who just wants to watch two fighters go at just need to tune into what ever channel its being shown on and wont need to splash out the coin to watch UFC
People always go on about how deep the UFC roster is but unless you have a champion fighting or Randy on the card most people will flame the shit out of it and say oh this should be free as there is no big names on the card (eg if randy wasnt on 105 it wud be utter shit) even 106 is a weak card only thing saving it for hardcore fans is kos vs rumble and imo Rogerio vs cane since Brock has man flu
bit of a random rant and prob dont even make sense, im just wasting time in work as its blooooody dead
by CoNr on Nov 9, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
CoNr. Super dead here too. Stupid Economy. SF is also a PPV company. I don’t think they are going to stop doing PPV just because of a deal with CBS. PPV is where the big money is. We don’t know what SF is paying their fighters so saying that they aren’t going to pay too much is a little presumptuous(sp?). Even the crappy cards UFC puts out will do better PPV numbers then SF.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah man we not had any design work in for like 3 days ( im graphic designer/illustrator) think the economy is on life support.
Ah i didnt no about the SF being PPV, being in UK Ii just d/l the fights so i assumed they where all on Network TV like elite XC was most of the time, specially with all the woohaa about them being on CBS. so i stand corrected
as for the salaries, i Know they have released them before as i remember Gegard only getting about 2k for beating Babalu where carano got around £125k and i think she was highest paid fighter on that card with the rest getting around 25k not including win bonus’s etc
where i think kimbo was getting like 500k on elite and i heard some fighters got in the millions on Affliction ( but i have no proof of this just what i heard)
all in all i dont want UFC to go anywhere but i do think SF is gonna get stronger, but i do agree with ur earlier post Jay, you piss off Mr white and your not gonna last long in the MMA promoters game
anyone know how SF managed to get a TV deal where UFC has been struggling to land one?
by CoNr on Nov 9, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
UFC could have had a deal a long time ago, but DW makes it impossible.
The last Carano fight was PPV here.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 12:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
from what I’ve heard, the UFC/Network TV deal keeps getting held up for the same kind of reasons that UFC won’t get Fedor. UFC doesn’t co-promote and won’t allow anyone to mess with their content. And why should they?!? They’re the premier product in the industry. If you noticed on this Strikeforce card, CBS brought in their own announcers and all we kept hearing was "CBS SATURDAY NIGHT FIGHTS. I only heard 2 little footnote mentions of "brought to you by CBS, Strikeforce, in conjuction with M-1 global and (I forgot which energy drink or nutrition product.) Do you think, after he’s worked for 10 years to make “UFC” the “Porshe” of MMA events, that Dana is gonna let some network execs come in and start telling him how to run his show and using all his fighters and promotion and then barely mentioning “UFC” on Television. HELL NO! Dana would saw off his own leg before he’d let that happen. He’s biding his time till the networks realize what a gem he’s got and are willing to air it as “UFC Fight Night” instead of “Fox Fight Night” or whatever.
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 7:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“for those of you who believe fedor was losing on the scorecard your crazy fedor secured 2 takedowns and attempted two subs and landed a left bomb in the 1st while roger landed 1 jab and three effective shots from the guard.”
Rogers (with no ground skills to speak of) threw him off quickly. Rogers (with no ground skills to speak of) got out of those weak sub attempts and reversed postion on one of them. The ‘bomb’ you speak of did no damage and the jab that Rogers landed had Fedor bleeding like a broken faucet.
Round one definitely went to Rogers for Damage and better positioning.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jay I’m just wondering how you assume he doesn’t have any ground skills? Since that was probably the first time he was taken to the ground. If you can win 10 fights without being taken to the ground and all by ko or tko is it really his fault nobody took him down? That’s pretty impressive. He also looked pretty good on the ground to me what do you think mma fighters do when they train?? Just practice in one field? If so I suggest you look up what MMA stands for :)
by Kayo on Nov 9, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
who says he has no ground skills?
Rogers (with no ground skills to speak of) threw him off quickly. Rogers (with no ground skills to speak of) got out of those weak sub attempts and reversed postion on one of them.
how can you say no ground skills when he did not get destroyed on the ground be one of the best ground fighters?
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
roy…he has no jitz training and didn’t compete in any collegiate wrestling. That is what I mean. The fact that Fedor didn’t destroy him(or win the ground fighting) is further proof of Fedor not being ‘the best ground fighter’. He isn’t a ground fighter at all and he handled himself well against Fedor. That speaks very very badly of Fedor.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he has no jitz training? are you crazy of course he trains in jits.
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
roy, where does he train? How long has he been there? What belt has he aquired? Training a little ground game and having a background are two totally different things. I train jitz too, but I wouldn’t be stupid enough to think I could be effective on the ground against as you put it earlier “one of the best ground fighters”.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
jay when did become such a big rogers fan that you know he does not train jits? and he has no ground game you keep saying after he already showed ou he did in the F’ing fight? anyone in mma today trains jits please come up with something better your getting your culo kicked all over this thread.
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 1:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
as you put it earlier "one of the best ground fighters".
are you saying fedor isn’t one of the best ground fighters? jay your losing it.
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess it depends on what you mean? Do I think he could walk into an ADCC tourney next week and win the HW division? No. But as far as smarts and non-technical ground work…no one is in the same league.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
roy, is Rogers a ground wizard to you now because he threw Fedor off with brute strength? He is bottom of the ladder on the ground and you know it.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also to answer a question from earlier roy. The Gina Carano fight she had against Cyborg was PPV here. I don’t know where you are from but in Canada we had to pay for that. That is why I was saying ‘go back to PPV’
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no bottom of the ladder would be no ground game, houston , kimbo and others.
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I will agree to disagree. Just because I would put Rogers with those guys. At least until I have seen him use it.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
…so that’s what you meant about Strikeforce having a PPV model, Jay? I was confused by that, didn’t know they were PPV in Canada. In USA Strikeforce is on SHOWTIME (when not on CBS) which is a premium cable channel that people pay a few dollars a month to add to their cable package.
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
another thing I like to add is mcarthy being blacklisted by the ufc is probably the best thing that ever happened to him he has the pleasure of being able to officiate for a truly special athlete
by dia mette on Nov 9, 2009 2:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great night of fights i enjoyed all of them even the Shields vs Miller(not as much though)it was definitely a great card on paper and turned out to be real good definitely the best free card of this year.
Rogers vs Bigfoot would be freaken awesome!
by Khaos_Warrior on Nov 9, 2009 4:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jake Shields and Jason Miller put on a good show for MMA fans, not for general public.
by Eduardo on Nov 9, 2009 6:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Now I’m looking forward to Jesse Holland going back on Pro MMA Radio and defending his prediction of only 2 million viewers he made on last week’s show. My guess before the show was in the 3-4 million viewer range.
by DCRage on Nov 9, 2009 6:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Key word non harmful LOL the action from GSP and the shield on the ground is night and and day GSP dominates and damages his opponent knows he got his ass handed to him.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 9:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“Shields is a non harmful version of GSP”
lol! Best comment of the day!
by Alpha Male on Nov 9, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly! Sheilds is like a Pitt Bull who’s had his teeth filed down, he can still get any other dog by the throat and pin them down, but he can’t break the skin.
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly. All you have to do is look at BJ Penn after 4 rounds of GNP and compare it to Miller after 5. Miller looked absolutely fine which is crazy considering he was mounted at least a half dozen times.
by stevo on Nov 9, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shields is the non-athletic, non-exciting, non-marketable version of a 60 year old GSP. They are nothing alike.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
dont get carried away.. if he learns to inflict damage then there a problem for anyone that faces him. That was pretty stupid to say JAY poor attempt at humor.
by zack on Nov 9, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Learns to inflict damage? Do you think this was his first fight? He doesn’t have power in his hands. That isn’t something you can learn by reading a book.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe he learns how to distract the ref while he pulls a shiv out of his trunks. That’s about it. Three-year-olds throwing temper tantrums in the mall throw harder hands than Shields does.
by PW on Nov 9, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fedor is the best in the world, because he has fought the best, and he is undefeated over the past 9 years! Tyson, was never that dominant over that length of time. Based on that record, fedor is the greatest MMA fighter of all time. Ufc is worthless. They do not have the best fighters fight eachother. Brock is afraid of Shane, and if the fight ever happens, Brock will get NTFO in the 1st round. Dana White rips people off with the high cost of PPV, with very little debth. Why would I pay money for tito vs forest? Most of the fights on the free Strikeforce Card were better than that.
by Rick on Nov 9, 2009 8:19 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Your no MMA fan any one that rips the UFC is a moron. The UFC gives MMA fans more action than anyone on the planet with top calibure fighters more free events and more replays and TUF on top of everything. I don’t know why I’m even replying to your comment you obviously have no clue LOL just being a hater brutal.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 9:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Puck head take DANA Whites Penis out ur mouth and put it back in your girls
by zack on Nov 9, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ohh zach proves once again he has little intelligence when talking MMA imagine that a Fedor troll LOL
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 1:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Rick, if you were a real fight fan, you’d know that “Knocked Out” doesnt start with an “N”.
by shonuff on Nov 10, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fedor once again proved to be the best lb for lb in the world, I didn’t have a problem with the shields fight but the general public might find it boring but it’s no different when they find a pure boxing match boring as well
by Robert(1) on Nov 9, 2009 8:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i don’t know about proving he was the best pound for pound it was a great fight Rogers earned a lot of respect for his first fight against a top seven HW though and had Fedor in trouble a couple times but like I said Fedor was going to be throw the bombs like he did against AA one thing for sure Fedor has great defence all around and still stays aggressive thats what makes him debated as one of the to PfP fighters.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 9:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ps I like free stuff but would anybody else rather pay 40 bucks and have no commericals?
by Robert(1) on Nov 9, 2009 8:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m with you on that. I was entertained by the fights, but the commercials and lack of showing the fighter entrances (with exception of Mayhem’s sideshow) kind of took the life out of it for me. I love the build ups and entrances of the fighters. And, when they did show an entrance, it was all WWE-like with fireballs and sparks…overall, not a bad fight for free.
by slim473 on Nov 9, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Robert(1). I was thinking the same thing. I have no problems paying money to skip commercials. I wouldn’t pay 40 bucks for every card, but I would have gladly paid the 40 dollars for this card to miss all them commercials.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Even with the commercials they got to the fights faster than in the UFC. They spend way to much time having Joe and Mike stand around and talk.
by BenLardo on Nov 9, 2009 5:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
These shows will get better with time. We looking for perfection from the first show is not fair. This was strikeforces first Network Show. CBS is gonna use thier own announcers that is something that strikeforce cant chnge. At least they got Shamrock and he actually did a good job even though I think he is a tool. The shows will get better with time. The next show will be a little better and the next even more better.Commercials are aggravating but I would much rather have them than pay 50 bucks. Hell all I do is talk crap to friends between fights anyways. We all have already seen fight build up in the weeks before the fight anyway.
I remember when Zuffa purchased the UFC. I can say that thier first ten events were not that great or sound either. How long did it take them to get it right? How many different commentators did they go through? Several. We cant ask for a perfect show the first time for strikeforce orthe fourth time for CBS. Plus it went head to head with the saturday ffotball games and did great.Even the ufc doesnt try that. They start at ten. Florida nor USC had even made it to half by the time fights started
by lance on Nov 9, 2009 9:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This isn’t SF’s first show. They have been at it for a while.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that’s very good actually- remember people this event was going up against many NCAA Football games so to score #1 in the core male age groups is saying a lot
by kibbled_bits on Nov 9, 2009 9:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Strikeforce did well for themselves I’m sure during the Fedor time they will have numbers equal or greater than Kimbos 4.5 on Spike when he fought on TUF.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 10:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure where these numbers fall in with the rank and file, but it seems that they give a pretty good indication on how the next CBS shows will do. Remember, this is Strikeforce/CBS’s first show. It only stands to reason that the numbers will improve. Will CBS be satisfied?…that’s the question. You have to remember that if re-runs of CSI or Entertainment Tonight bring in more viewers, then CBS will look at pulling the plug…I mean ratings are everything. Here’s to hoping CBS is satisfied.
I agree that the Shields/Miller fight could have been more “fan” friendly, but I don’t blame Shields for that, and don’t really know why any of you would. Take any WW wrestler/grappler and move him up to MW against a predominantly stand-up striker (an unorthodox one at that), and the end result will either be a quick KO by the striker, or a grappling match. I think Shields would be better served hanging out at WW. I know SF doesn’t exactly have a plethora of talent at WW, but at least let him fight a few times on CBS to boost his reputation a little. I can’t remember the last snooze fest Shields had at WW.
I can’t help but think that Jake is trying to satisfy the haters by moving up in weight to fight some bigger names…and ironically enough the same people he’s trying to staisfy are the same people that are calling him the “King of LnP” now that he did.
Anyway…I enjoyed the show, and here’s to hoping Strikeforce and CBS have a long and successful run.
by OJR Is King (formerly Introvert) on Nov 9, 2009 10:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
SF will do good numbers when Fedor is fighting on the card. I think though from here on out Fedor cards are PPV. They won’t get enough buys and will be closed soon like the rest.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 10:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would they be “closed”?
SF is a successful promotion….EXC wasn’t.
by OJR Is King (formerly Introvert) on Nov 9, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because they can’t have Fedor fight on every one of their cards. When they go back to PPV, do you think even the hardest of hardcore fighters are going to pay 40 bucks to see Werdum, big foot, Rogers, Diaz, Shields, Mayhem, Overoids any of these dudes? I won’t pay 20 cents to see those guys or Fedor fight another unworthy opponent.
Oh yeah….Fedor messed his hand up Saturday, if he is out for more than 6 months do you think SF can put up enough good cards to stay afloat?
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
when they go back to ppv? when where they ppv? strike force is getting better and better more talent all the time the next card will not have fedor and it is looking good.
by roy on Nov 9, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and I must say to those of you who don’t think Fedor is marketable to the general public….
My wife can’t stand MMA and was on the couch beside me, reading her book, while I was watching the event. She didn’t look at the television once during the whole show….until Fedor got bloodied up by Rogers. By the time Fedor KO’d Bret…. she was out of her chair. After the fight I found myself answering 20 questions, starting with “who is that guy”?
Take it for what you think it’s worth, but Fedor is marketable.
Some of you seem to look at this CBS thing through “hardcore fan” glasses…you need to take them off when looking at this deal. We hardcore fans will know an event is coming ahead of time and revolve our schedule around the event. The “casual fan” doesn’t do that. The casual fan will stop at an MMA event when flipping through the channels, but only if the production level, and/or entertainment value seems up to snuff. These are the people that SF/CBS will succeed with….not us.
If you think about it….the UFC gets between 500,000 and 1 million viewers per PPV (can’t confirm the numbers, because the UFC doesn’t release them…but I think this is the general consensus). Since the numbers for their PPV’s seem to be pretty steady it is only reasonable to assume that the people purchasing the event are the same people…“hardcore fans”. The reason I bring this up is to call into question the UFC’s “counter-programming” solution for competing with CBS and Strikeforce. Wouldn’t it stand to reason that the more “casual fans” that watch the SF event…..the more casual fans would think about buying a UFC PPV?
I know at first glance most of you would say that it makes no sense to let your competition make money when you can do something to at least stop some of it….I just know that there are two different outlooks on marketing to new customers through the media….
1) Do it as a stand-alone company without grouping yourself with other companies in the same category.
2) Advertise with other companies and reach a broader audience.
I’m not saying the UFC should join anyone else…I’m just thinking that they aren’t doing themselves any favours by counter-programming at this stage of the game. I mean, really…who watched the UFC re-run over the CBS show?…people who buy UFC PPV’s in the first place!!!!
JMHO
by OJR Is King (formerly Introvert) on Nov 9, 2009 10:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I LOL’d when you said that thing about your wife sitting there reading a book. Mine was doing the exact same thing except she likes MMA, well UFC. She liked the fight and thought Fedor was losing. She is what I would call a casual fan. She watches all the PPV’s with me but doesn’t go out of her way to watch them when I watch them elsewhere. She had never seen Fedor fight before last night and I spent the whole time saying " No seriously he is good usually". I think she represents the ‘casual fan’ fairly well and she just wasn’t impressed. All the casual fans who have never watched Fedor before last night(that I have asked) have said Brock would kill him and that he isn’t the best. He had a poor showing Saturday and you guys don’t see it.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
JAY you have no clue. Carwin has the same amateur striking as Rogers and would be KO easily. Brock is the only man that can Beat FEDOR. JAY put it like this CARWIn would be handled just as easily as your mother on a SAturday night in one of those white trash bars she frequently visits. 10 on 1 type of thing. hahahahha
by zack on Nov 9, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You can’t say for sure Carwin is a differnt Striker than rogers if he connects it’s lights out for anyone Carwin is a little like Rogers in the fact that his ground game in unknown how good but it’s safe to say he should have a better game than Rogers.
by Puck Head on Nov 9, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
JAY you have no clue. Carwin has the same amateur striking as Rogers and would be KO easily. Brock is the only man that can Beat FEDOR. JAY put it like this CARWIn would be handled just as easily as your wife on a SAturday night in one of those white trash bars she frequently visits. 10 on 1 type of thing. hahahah
by zack on Nov 9, 2009 12:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
ZACH, this is the last time I will ever read a post with your name on it so I hope you’ve enjoyed our previous banter. Did you really think that you needed to post that HILARIOUS joke on every thread for the last two days? No one has responded with an LOL or good joke, anything. You aren’t funny. What is it you are adding to this site? You posted the exact same thing like 3 times on this thread alone. My parents have both been dead for over 4 years now. I am not a teenager like yourself so my mom if she were alive would be much too old to hang at a bar doing the odd things you describe. If you want to come in here and just shoot down people(whom you’ve never met) you aren’t going to get very far. Most of the people in here are adults and grow tired of these sorts of games QUICKLY. If you notice my posts are about the subject and are my opinions, I’m not saying they are right or even popular. But to come in here and choose a man-crush then follow him around a spout your homo erotic fantasies at them just doesn’t make sense. One day you will grow up and realize that kids like you only say the sort of things they do to get attention, Much like cutting yourself to make others notice you (something I suggest you try, start with the jugular). Go away little boy, we don’t need you.
Also since you did mention something about MMA I will explain something to you. Can you show me a post I made where I said Shane had better striking than Rogers? He is a better fighter, not a better striker, this isn’t boxing and there is more to MMA than striking. Carwin is a good wrestler making him a more difficult opponent for Fedor. How can you say Brock has a chance at beating Fedor and Shane doesn’t? Did you already see Shane and Brock fight? Brock might lose to Shane still.
by jay on Nov 9, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
JAY you have no clue. Carwin has the same amateur striking as Rogers and would be KO easily. Brock is the only man that can Beat FEDOR. JAY put it like this CARWIn would be handled just as easily as your mother on a SAturday night in one of those white trash bars she frequently visits. 10 on 1 type of thing. hahahah
by zack on Nov 9, 2009 12:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
this f u c k i n site and slow loading of comments WTF is up with that
by zack on Nov 9, 2009 1:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
UFC is to Strikeforce in USA as Dream is to Sengoku in Japan. imo, the top 2 MMA organizations are the UFC and Dream.
Had free time so I watched the SF card nov 7th, and to me, its mixed. You got guys that get very close to finishing the fight but fuks up and ends up on the wrong side of a decision. Big Foot should’ve put more pressure on Werdum, he had him badly hurt in a few spots and couldn’t finish it. Miller could’ve finished Shields but his complete lack of TD screwed him. He’s good on the ground but was too lazy, could’ve hit Shields in the ribs a few times to get him thinking and loosen him up. Instead he just sitting there being cocky and stupid. Fedor kept throwing the same punches at least 3 or 4 times before the KO. Rogers should’ve had an idea of what Fedor was trying to do, and fatass couldn’t keep his hands up and got KTFO. Rogers is too fat, too slow, and doesn’t have the skills to do what he wants. He would’ve had a good chance to beat Fedor, got a couple of hits in, but didn’t capitalize on his reach. He could’ve threw a few feints using his legs to setup his punch or use more leg kicks to slow Fedor down and keep him from using those ridiculous falcon punches. Some exciting moments but very disappointing fighters.
by jaime on Nov 9, 2009 1:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Either way the bashing of Fedor is outrageous.. whether he gets hurt or not he always finds a way to win. How could you say Carwin is a better fighter than Rogers because he is a more accomplished wrestler? Lets look at body of work as the criteria for judging as it should be. Rogers gave Fedor a good fight and has KO a Great FIghter. Carwin has done neither. From looking at Carwinsd striking in the GOnzaga fight i can clearly tell you that Fedor would destroy him standing even worse than Rogers. Atleast Bret had some reach on his side. Jay you have too much of a UFC biased opinion to even have an intelligent MMa debate.
by ZAck on Nov 9, 2009 3:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thats was an excellent event, one of the best.
by the spyder on Nov 9, 2009 7:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah they should of had it on the same time zone fer sure, CBS failed right there miserably, wonder y, who knows maybe to hustle a buck off of us westcoast people, like really wtf is a broadcast delay? sounds like a bullshit charge for extra bucks on the companys side so maybe it was a budget thing cus I coulda bought the fight online and see it a few hours earlier but screw that
by dustin on Nov 10, 2009 9:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















