Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

'Big' John McCarthy not selected to officiate at UFC 104

Mixed martial arts referee "Big" John McCarthy was not selected to officiate at the upcoming UFC 104: "Machida vs. Shogun" event on Oct. 24 -- despite a call he made to the California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) to inform them he was available, according to Sherdog.com.

McCarthy — perhaps the most recognized and respected referee in the history of the sport — retired from his in-ring duties following his 535th bout (the main event between Roger Huerta and Clay Guida) at The Ultimate Fighter (TUF) 6 Finale in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Dec. 8, 2007.

"Big" John hung up the medical gloves to pursue a new career as an on-air personality and strategic adviser for The Fight Network, as well as a color commentator for the Affliction: "Banned" event in July 2008.

During his absence, the famed referee made comments in support of then-exiled star Randy Couture, as well as some criticism regarding the direction of UFC pay-per-views and its current officiating.

Star-divide

While the critique was small potatoes, it didn’t sit well with UFC President Dana White or Keith Kizer, Executive Director of the NSAC. Both sides remained diplomatic, but McCarthy has been unsuccessful in his attempt to get re-licensed in the state of Nevada after his Sept. 10 application was passed over.

The California native also reapplied in his home state and was re-licensed without incident, returning to action at Strikeforce: "Destruction" in November 2008.

Internet activists started a Twitter campaign to persuade the powers that be to enlist the services of McCarthy for UFC 104, however those efforts were in vain.

MMA fans will instead have to settle for his scheduled appearance at the upcoming Strikeforce show booked for Fresno on November 6.

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Dana has power that extends to scary places …lol…Don’t piss off the boss I guess…..Big John still is the absolute best in the bizz !!!

by BigPelly on Oct 21, 2009 12:25 AM EDT reply actions  

exactly, a coincidence that big joh is not doing this event not even close

yet for the strikeforce in CA he was the ref for every other bout

by dia mette on Oct 21, 2009 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, Dana white controls everything. He’s behind every major conspiracy. He’s an alien.

by MMACrossfire on Oct 21, 2009 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

haha big bad Dana White. He helped build the pyramids and lives in the Bermuda Triangle.

by Cali Rick on Oct 21, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Real scumbaggery here. People need to stop gettin butt hurt over everything. These judges and refs are out here tryin to ruin the sport and the man with most potential to prevent it is being shut out. Fn ridiculous. I had downgraded CSAC as 3rd sh!ttiest commission after revamping their drug testing and ousting all those scumbags but they just rebounded right back to #2.

by NameNotRequired on Oct 21, 2009 12:28 AM EDT reply actions  

yea i think scumbaggery seems to be the most appropriate word here NNR, good choice lol
this really is ridiculous like i don’t know what to say. its a goddamn joke.

by Blunt N' Beer on Oct 21, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah Dana always talks about how he gives the fans what they want. The fans clearly want a solid judge like Big John back. If Dana has the influence to shut out big John you’d think he’d get Mazigatti black balled.

by Rawrr on Oct 21, 2009 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

fans want good fights first, Big John is the best but it doesn’t down grade UFC 104 by any means. You can’t talk bad about your former boss and your former company and then pretend nothing happened….If that was me or you, the same outcome would occur, why would this be any different? Its business..

by Robert(1) on Oct 21, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dana was never John’s boss. He works for the athletic commission.

by frosnt on Oct 21, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

What frost said. This simply means that Dana has the power to strongarm Athletic Commission which can be the greatest or the worst thing to happen to our sport.

by NameNotRequired on Oct 21, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

this is nothing short of a Tradgedy! Big John has done a lot for mma…and is BY FAR the best Referee in the business. Whats even worse is that Dana should not have this power over any athletic commision! Nothing would make me happier then seeing Big John refereeing the Machida/shogun fight!

This is just sad!

Where is Introvert at?

by john G on Oct 21, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve made my feelings pretty clear in other threads on Big John but I’ll say it again, this is disgraceful behaviour by the UFC and is making a mockery of the sport of MMA. They should not have the power to pick and choose referees as it hints at fight fixing, something that a new combat sport brand does not want to be associated with if it aims for long-term success. Dana is acting childish and crooked in this instance and all he had to say for himself was that Big John doesn’t love being a ref unlike some old boxing ref he knew.

I’m already sick of poor judgements made by referees and judges in MMA and boxing, so to blackball one of the best refs in MMA for a big PPV is taking the sport in the wrong direction. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a horrible mistake at 104 made by a ref who is only there because Big John wasn’t allowed to officiate.

I am a fan of MMA because it’s a pure sport free of greed and corruption, though recently my patience has been tested by greedy fighters and corrupt promoters. Banning top refs is something that has me worried for the legitimacy of the sport, it’s hard to appreciate something if there’s a chance that it’s fixed. Sports teams have no control over referees so MMA promotions and fighters shouldn’t either.

by David W-S on Oct 21, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like it was mentioned above, you honestly think if Dana could pick and choose so easily, that Mazz would still be reffing in the UFC? Dana loathes him. The fact that Kizer is miffed with John is the bigger issue.

by Big D on Oct 21, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kizer’s pretty chummy with the UFC and it looks like they have some sort of influence over the NSAC and their decisions, this CSAC snub for 104 pretty much confirms it. Dana has made it clear that he doesn’t think that Big John’s heart is in being a ref and I think that’s just an excuse to prevent a top ref from doing his job because he took a job with the competition. The whole thing annoys me and makes me fear for the legitimacy of the sport.

by David W-S on Oct 21, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Total BS to keep John from officiating wherever he can as he is clearly the best at what he does. It just means we’re likely to see a few shitty decisions come Saturday night because of this.

I wish there were more like him in the business.

by Ca$z on Oct 21, 2009 4:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

man who stab their bosses in the back, after they made them a house hold name! Those business men

by Robert(1) on Oct 21, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ya cause Dana has never said anything negative about his employers or anyone for that matter.

Hi Dana sacksuckers

by Daniel worby on Oct 21, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Daniel you are a little late to jump on the “Don’t trust Dana” bandwagon. Funny how MMA wouldn’t be around in North America if not for him, yet any time someone agrees with him you get called out for being gay for him. Lame, really. If you hate the guy so much(since it is the cool thing to do these days) don’t watch his product. Oh, not so cool to hate him now is it???

by jay on Oct 21, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also Big John was a household name long before Dana. People need to realize that White didn’t invent the sport or the unified rule or got it first sanctioned. This is just Dana’s way of handling things. It has worked so far and it will continue to work so long as the UFC is king.

by NameNotRequired on Oct 21, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Its never too late jay!

Hop on! Join reality its great! If you think this is my 1st Dana rant? Or I’m new to it? Buahahaha @ you. He built it now he’s slowly destroying it. Its time for a respectful human to be there alongside to slap his hand @ times and say “dummy up Dana, before you cost us another fighter”.

His mouth and lack of respect is why ppl are leaving like its in fashion. Not money. That includes not signing ppl.

*FEDOR
*tito
*randy
*huerta
*rampage
*hendo
And more.

Not just from money. These ppl aren’t ready to give up their dignity and respect for this scum. Their grown ups unlike you. Maybe your easy to push around and have no spine, but that’s ur thing. Not these guys.

I love UFC. I don’t watch it for Dana. I watch it for the fighters, that if you haven’t noticed aren’t all that happy, & are finally speaking up (ie: Anderson is gonzo asap cause he’s a Dana h8er too & h8’s the tie down restrictions of UFC)

Wake up guys

by Daniel worby on Oct 21, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rampage left to make a movie and ruined a reality show becuase of it and also left another fighter in limbo not fighting(Rashad)
Hendo knocks out Bisping and all of a sudden he wants to get paid like Brock, he forgets he lost both title matches in the UFC
Huerta also left to make a movie and said wanted a yr off
Tito and Randy were both found to be dishonest and are now back in the UFC
Fedor is the best but can make more for his Russian friends but not fighting in the UFC with a chance of losing

by Robert(1) on Oct 21, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

5 OUT OF THOSE 6 DO OR WILL BE FIGHTING IN THE UFC. Weak post again Danny boy. Even Fedor will likely be there as soon as he is able to break his ties to the russian mafia.

by jay on Oct 21, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

awww, poor big john!

by jj on Oct 21, 2009 12:35 AM EDT reply actions  

i miss the man..he was/is the best ref for the job..they better get him back, cuz there have been far too many sketchy calls these days..geez!!

by sarah on Oct 21, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I read the original reason he wasn’t issued previously was because he formed a close alliances with a training team and it was deemed there maybe a conflict of interest with the ref position, maybe also the Californian branch isn’t as stringent in background checks and who knows what goes on over there with Strikeforce promoters…..Hey, Big John himself is a draw.

by davomaniac on Oct 21, 2009 12:50 AM EDT reply actions  

John is the for sure one of the top refs around, they better let him back in there or I’m boycotting and changing to watching women’s hockey only!

by syncro on Oct 21, 2009 12:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Women hockey players are sweet.

by JayJay on Oct 21, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now that just sucks. Big John may be the ONLY MMA ref worthy of the name. C’mon, Dana, suck up your pride and do the right thing…

by BigRedOne on Oct 21, 2009 12:53 AM EDT reply actions  

LOL stupid ass UFC only hurts itself by not letting Big John back, Big John has nothing to gain with being a ref for UFC events or anyones elses events.

by Khaos_Warrior on Oct 21, 2009 12:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Wierd why do like 40%of my post not make it through???

Type it again i guess….

The UFC is the loser here not Big John he has nothing to gain from being a ref for any UFC event or any MMA event. Not letting the best ref in mma be a part of your event =DUMB DUMB DUMB.

by Khaos_Warrior on Oct 21, 2009 12:58 AM EDT reply actions  

It doesnt make sense for Big John to get the shaft when they still let Migliotta ref fights. Gotta be some backdoor politics going on here.

by FightTrends.com on Oct 21, 2009 1:01 AM EDT reply actions  

I am telling you this is crap. Makes you wonder how much power someone has. It is a major rumor that certain affliction shows got moved because of Dana. If he has that much power can the spot itself be completely legit

by Lance on Oct 21, 2009 1:37 AM EDT reply actions  

How many times does it need to be said, that the UFC has no control over who refs their events? What ever the conflict is, its between Big John and the commission. Corruption is why Boxing and MMA will never be on the major 4 sports level.

by Woody on Oct 21, 2009 2:59 AM EDT reply actions  

No matter how many times its said, it’ll never be enough because some people would simply prefer to believe that Dana White is behind everything.

by Jase on Oct 21, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly what Woody said. Why else would they’ve let Mazagatti referee when DW was against it? It’s the commission.

by lavis on Oct 21, 2009 4:17 AM EDT reply actions  

except wasn’t one of the Fertitta bros. on the Nevada athletic commission. It’s all about who you know. So while the UFC doesn’t get to pick the refs outright I’m sure a call to a friend still on the commission in Nevada or even Ca will influence what refs end up where

by cheshirewulf on Oct 21, 2009 5:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

John is the best ref out their, even better than Herb Dean with his “watch the back of the head obsession.” Dana’s given everyone else a second chance, why not this guy?

by Josh H. on Oct 21, 2009 7:18 AM EDT reply actions  

This picture is hilarious.

by neeko on Oct 21, 2009 8:19 AM EDT reply actions  

This does mean that Big John will ref again someday for the UFC doesn’t it? I thought that door was closed completely? My guess is we will get to see John ref for them again sometime soon. That sounds good enough to me.

by jay on Oct 21, 2009 9:19 AM EDT reply actions  

WHO CARES!! He’s a effin REF, I don’t watch UFC for the ref’s.

by Lancelot on Oct 21, 2009 9:22 AM EDT reply actions  

He is the best ref. Have you ever watched a fight and it was ruined due to poor reffing? Well Big John eradicates that problem. He is the only ref who knows what he is doing.

by jay on Oct 21, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

What should be called into question is Dana and Kizer’s cozy little relationship. Not sure what difference a referee talking about officiating, Randy Couture, and PPV revenue has to do with his actual officiating skillset. Seems to me like he’s being black-balled for political purposes, basically.

by introvert on Oct 21, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions  

John got too greedy and wanted to cash in on his fame. He started expressing opinions about the UFC, who made him what he is and running his mouth where he shouldnt.

That is unacceptable for a referee, who is supposed to do his job and be completely objective. It is his own fault, and it will limit his busyness.

On the other hand he really is the best at what he does and its too bad that he will not be doing any UFC shows anytime soon. But Dana is definitely not to blame. I’d rather have shitty referees than refs who only think about the money and let that affect their decisions. A referee should never get a big head and try to get famous and then go back to being a referee…

Once he gets out and tries to make money of certain organizations, his decisions are automatically worth less, since now he is thinking about his image.

Just my opinions, sry for the rant.

by Instant_Noodle on Oct 21, 2009 10:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Isn’t the fact that Big John called into question the inconsistent job that referees are doing being “objective”? Especially since many fans and other people (Dana included) have also been calling out inconsistent referees? If Big John were still refeing for the UFC and the other refs were still inconsistent and Big John were to state otherwise…that would be the opposite of “objective”, IMO.

The fact that you say “he’s the best at what he does” should be all that matters.

by introvert on Oct 21, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

My main point is that if his job is refereeing than that is what he should stick to. I think as soon as he starts to cash in on his fame and does things like commentator or TV personality, which probably pays more than he gets for reffing, then that will influence his referee decisions at which point the decisions he makes and the motives behind them become questionable.

You are right, the fact that he is the best referee SHOULD matter most, but in my opinion he tarnishes that when he does his other jobs. I believe sports referees are supposed to be in the background to a certain degree, so that they do not get influenced by the fame and the spotlight that they might land in.

by Instant_Noodle on Oct 21, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

You’re assumptions that he was “cashing in on his fame” are just assumptions. Hell, the guy was just making a living anyway.

Were his commentary jobs and doing analyst stuff for MMA events most likely a direct result from his officating work, and did his officiating lend additional insight to his commentary?…absolutely. But to assume that his commentary work is somehow going to reflect negatively on any future officiating jobs is not something that would ever happen, IMO.

by introvert on Oct 21, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ya, we will have to agree to disagree here. I believe it could very well happen that his new duties and job will reflect on future officiating. Maybe not consciously, but refereeing is a very in-the-moment kind of job.

Decisions have to be made in split-seconds and the subconscious predispositions play a strong role. Future gains from certain outcomes could very well come into play. That is why I think referees should stay away from other jobs in the same field and organizations where they carry out their primary duties.

by Instant_Noodle on Oct 21, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

That’s exactly why Athletic Commisions are under fire for accepting “gifts” from certain MMA promotions…that’s a greater issue than what John has done.

by introvert on Oct 21, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whilst I agree that Big John got too big for his boots and thought that he was bigger than he was, it is still very worrying that the UFC has the power to blackball a top ref from their PPVs. That is too much influence and makes the sport less legitimate, athletic commissions should be independent bodies with no attachment to any promotion, promoter or fighter, that way they can fairly drug test the fighters and choose the refs and judges. Messing around with this system by having friends in the commission or paying them off screams of corruption and is something that I don’t want to see in this sport.

Part of the appeal of MMA to me is that it is pure and clean, with top fighters competing to be the best for honour not money and the fights are all officiated by the best possible refs who know what they’re doing and are only there to keep the fighters safe, remaining impartial throughout. If outside bodies can influence which refs are chosen then it’s worrying, as they could be paid off to fix the fight in favour of a talentless posterboy like Kimbo, taking away the sport aspect of MMA and turning it into entertainment. If I wanted to see that then I’d watch pro wrestling and I hope that any corruption stops here.

by David W-S on Oct 21, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

David, I agree that athletic commissions should be impartial and not attached to any promotion. In that case maybe there should be rules for referees also that they cannot work for a promotion (like john did as a commentator and tv personality etc.)

And Lorenzo being on the board of one of the commissions should also definitely not happen due to conflict of interest.

by Instant_Noodle on Oct 21, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

BRING HIM BACK

by Harold Howard on Oct 21, 2009 10:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Personally I don’t care if Big John comes back or not. Her Dean and Yamazaki do enough of a good job for me and the outcries for “unfair reffing” are overly exagerated. If anything it’s the stupid judges that score the rounds in a strange way that gets to me. Funny how everyone forgets that not only did Big John speak negatively of the UFC, but he also made statements that revealed that he’s on Rampage’s jock:

"Quinton, if the State of California takes your license from you just give me a call. I would love to chauffeur you around in that beautiful Audi R8 you have … seriously just call for anything, you will always have a fan here."

Talking bad about the UFC is one thing, but to openly express your ‘admiration’ for fighters and then trying to ref is an obvious concern.

The Yahoo article from a while back lays this out perfectly:

http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news?slug=dd-mmaranks092409&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

by Cali Rick on Oct 21, 2009 4:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Big John can’t officiate yet they let Steve Mazzagatti ref without a problem. Does that make sense? Big John will always be the best MMA ref.

by Lu Galasso on Oct 30, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

46976_small
The Day Jake Ellenberger and Nick Diaz Both Earned a Title Shot.
11_penn_diaz_34_small
6 UFC prospects I can't wait to see fight again
Beerfest-movie-07_small
Special Beermania pregame edition: UFC on Fuel TV 'Ellenberger vs Sanchez'
Beerfest-movie-07_small
Friday Fun Thread
P5080533_small
Mania Trip 2012

Recent FanPosts

208730_10150164903466743_503301742_7348043_3232767_n_small
UFC on Fuel: Sanchez vs Ellenberger - Preview
Venetian_mask_small
New Blackfly Comic- The Kimbo Conspiracies Part 34
Small
Is it me or has MMA been boring lately?
Me_2_small
ONE FC Weigh In Results: Rolles Gracie and Bob Sapp Almost Come to Blows
Small
Top 10 Welterweights
Small
Diaz Fans Need a Reality Check

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Garth-knight_small Jesse Holland

Solidsnake_small Geno Mrosko

Mmamania_logo_small Thomas Myers

Editors

Small Andrew Mendez

Mmamania_small Brian Hemminger

File1684_small Sergio Hernandez

Me_small Kevin Haggerty

Authors

What_ho_small Patrick L. Stumberg

5260_120799616881_564821881_3026489_7189708_n_small Adam Guillen Jr.