MMA Mania: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

WEC Quick Quote: Ben Henderson 'definitely' beat Donald Cerrone

cerrone_henderson_choke

"No excuses. I take my hat off to the guy. He did what he had to do. No excuses. It was a great fight and I'm ready to do it again anytime ... I think he won the fight. Some people say it might not have gone that way, but he definitely won the fight."

-- Donald Cerrone tips his cap to Ben Henderson, saying "Smooth" did enough in their five-round, back-and-forth battle to earn the unanimous decision from the judges sitting ringside. "Cowboy" admits that he got off to a slow start -- despite several tight submission attempts in the early going -- which more than likely cost him the interim lightweight title, as well as rematch against his nemesis, 155-pound champion Jamie Varner, in the near future. But it was close. Real close. And there are more than a handful of fans who thought Cerrone should have had his hand raised when all was said and done. Are you one of them ... or do you agree with the cowboy? Talk about one helluva fight.

0 recs  |  Comment 51 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

who cares. It was a great fight!!!

by Philly Blunt on Oct 11, 2009 11:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

definitely a great fight!~ very entertaining!~

imo- i had it scored henderson winning rounds 1-3, and cowboy taking the 4th and 5th..

round 1 was close and i wouldn’t argue with anyone who thinks cowboy won rounds 1,4 and 5.

bottom line it was a close fight that happened to be great..

the fans win!~ and thats all that matters..

by stinky~fingers on Oct 12, 2009 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice and refreshing to see a young guy give no excuses for a close loss. I personally gave the fight to Cowboy but it was a very close call and it’s really hard to see how much the judges give to someone attempting as much as Cowbiy does off his back whether it be strikes or sub attempts. Cerrone may have questionable take down defense sometimes but he’s the busiest guy off his back that I have ever seen not named Aoki.

by Buster Bluth on Oct 12, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cerrone definitely won rounds 1, 4, and 5.

by Jared on Oct 11, 2009 11:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I scored it that way as well. It was a crazy fight though. Definitely worth watching 2-3 more times IMO

by GreenStar on Oct 12, 2009 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cerrone won, doesn’t matter if he thinks ben won. According to the rules, he did and that won’t change the fact that the judges f#cked up.

by NameNotRequired on Oct 12, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you go to mma weekly they have all the rules and reasons why….henderson beat him 3 out of 5 minutes of that 1rst round!!! the cowboy lost thats all there is to it,get the fuck over it!

by joe daddy on Oct 12, 2009 2:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the WEC, judges score bouts based on effective striking, grappling, aggression, and cage control. Keep that in mind and watch the fight again. In the first 3 rounds, Ben had the edge in all four departments. He scored takedowns at will, kept Ceronne on his back for the bulk of each round, and pounded him relentlessly with blows to the body and head. Don lost fair and square. There’s just no case to be made to the contrary.

by just some dong on Oct 12, 2009 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except you’re completely disregarding that Ben was close to being finished in the first while cerrone did take shots but wasn’t even close. MMA Weekly sucks at MMA all you have to do is look at their rankings. We have to wait until FightMetric comes out with their full reports then you guys will see why. I started watching the fight about 3 mins into it so i thought ben won first and happy i called the upset. But rewatching it again i just don’t understand how. Rd 1, 4 was 10-9 for cerrone and rd 5 was 10-8 for cerrone.

by NameNotRequired on Oct 12, 2009 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

NNR lost some money huh? 1-3 Ben won. 4-5 Cerrone. Great fight.

by Ron Konkoma on Oct 12, 2009 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually NNR won some money. He been calling that upset for weeks now. He even convinced me into betting on Ben (btw, thanks NNR and VM), so cant even accuse the man of being sour. Personally, I thought cowboy won the fight as well, but why complain when I won money thanks to the atrocious judges. I dont care what the scoring system says..I have been watching mma LONG enough to know a winner when I see one, and COWBOY won that fight! He unleashed a rapid fire submission assault and was close to ending the fight a couple of times. All I care about is DAMAGE, and trying to end a fight…GOta give it to Cowboy, and Tip my hat to him for the no-excuse attitude!

by john G on Oct 12, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep, i got some money on that but my parlays were f’d so i was still in the red overall. No biggie though i came out really big with DREAM when my dark horse took the whole tourney. This month is gonna be busy with dream, ufc, wec, k1 max and strikeforce too. Hopefully i can come up big again.

by NameNotRequired on Oct 12, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the WEC, judges score bouts based on effective striking, grappling, aggression, and cage control. Keep that in mind and watch the fight again. In the first 3 rounds, Ben had the edge in all four departments. He scored takedowns at will, kept Ceronne on his back for the bulk of each round, and pounded him relentlessly with blows to the body and head. Don lost fair and square. There’s just no case to be made to the contrary.

by just some dong on Oct 12, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i thought Cerrone one the fight as well but it was amazing regardless. One of the best fights this year.

by Big D on Oct 12, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think so. Aren’t the points supposed to go to the guy who transitions into and gets the submission attempts? It seems more “brownie points” went to Henderson for getting caught in them. HAHAHA

by The Terminator on Oct 11, 2009 11:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i totally thought cerrone won but its like they say never leave it in the hands of the judges but regardless of what i think of the decision amazing fight

by kb on Oct 11, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

so the takedown and gnp counts for less than submissions?

not to mention henderson was in control for the last 3 minutes of the 1st round

by nelson on Oct 11, 2009 11:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think tight subs should be counted more than GnP bc they are very close to finishing the fight. As always, highly subjective, though. I thought Cerrone won the fight.

by frosnt1 on Oct 12, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, you have to see everything to score it, you can’t really say this or that scores more cause it all depends on how much damage it does and in how much trouble it gets the other fighter in.
What has happened in MMA though and why so many wrestlers wants to get into the sport, is because of the way the judges score MMA fights. You can win a match (supposed to be a fight) by just taking your opponent down, staying out of submissions and basically LnP your way through every round to a decision.
The scoring system favors wrestlers big time and it forces guys to hold back in the standup and implement the most boring strategies knowing that the guy who spends the most time on his back lose the fight.

two perfect examples of what i’m talking is the Sanchez/Guida Sanchez/Fitch fights. Diego won both (in reality) and he should’ve been awarded a 30-26 win over Guida and had a unanimous dec win (atleast 29-28) over Fitch since he clearly won the ground fight from his back, all Fitch had to do was to defend Diego’s attack the whole time. What was fun about these two fights was also that Diego himself dropped down to his back while going for submissions and obviously got it back in his face since the judges only sees the guy on top being in “control” even if he isn’t.

by RoBerto on Oct 12, 2009 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No offense Rob, but if you don’t think the guy on top has control, pick a fight with someone and then lay on your back on the ground. See if your opinion changes after a minute.

Fact is, in modern MMA, it’s pretty rare that someone finishes a fight from their back. It’s awesome when it happens, but it’s just really rare. Far more often, the fighter on their back suffers a vicious beating until he’s KO’d or choked out.

Consider the full guard. That’s basically a mount from the bottom, yet no one considers it to be a dominant position. That’s because it isn’t, because you’re not on top.

by just some dong on Oct 12, 2009 3:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

gravity is a bi@tch

by shamo84 on Oct 12, 2009 5:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spot on RoB, I’m amazed by some of the comments here, no way does control and being on top matter more than having an active guard, Cerrone came close to finishing the fight with a couple of tight submissions and to me that matters more than Henderson taking him down. Henderson did well to survive and controlled the rest of the round, but he should not have won a round by surviving, if anything it should have been a draw as he controlled the fight and did some damage with g&p but Cerrone had him in big trouble and had him hurt with those submissions. There is no chance that Smooth would have been awarded the round if he was rocked or knocked down so I don’t see why he is awarded the round for almost getting submitted as in both cases the fight is close to being finished so the points should go to the aggressor for damage and almost winning. I can see why Henderson won the round and thus the fight, but I don’t agree with it by any means.

I still don’t know why fighters are given more credit for a takedown, which only gives the fighter a chance to do damage, than for actually almost finishing the fight off your back, someone with an active guard like Cerrone is just as dangerous if not more so off his back than on top and the damage he did with those submissions as well as his past submission wins prove that. JSD obviously has never watched any Nog Bros, Diaz Bros or Cerrone fights if he doesn’t see many submission wins from the back and it frustrates me that most MMA judges would agree with his points, to me it shows a lack of understanding and respect to BJJ and bias towards wrestling to score fights based on control and position over damage on the ground.

Full credit to Cerrone for being a class act in defeat, his constant whining about Varner was getting on my nerves but he has shown Henderson a lot of respect by not complaining about this fight as he was unlucky to lose. Hopefully Varner will get beat by Henderson and we get to see the Cowboy in 2 rematches, whilst Jamie looked the most impressive of the 3 in the 2 fights, he showed the least heart and doesn’t have any of the toughness of either Cerrone or Henderson.

by David W-S on Oct 12, 2009 5:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Meaningful offense. That’s what i all comes down to. Whoever is doing more damage but most people have been conditioned to believe that without blood and bruises, the guy is just fine. We all saw how a single one of these failed sub attempts completely gassed Ben. Or how many times he was close to being finished. This is the same thing as when coleman lay on top of shogun, looked like he was going to die from every single punch but people still gave him rounds.

by NameNotRequired on Oct 12, 2009 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Meaningful offense. That’s what i all comes down to.”

But… it’s not.

by just some dong on Oct 12, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea I actually had Henderson winning rounds 1,2,3 and Cerrone winning 4 and 5…..all Cerrone did in round one was the guillotine attempt, but I definately thought Cerrone won round 4 & 5 sub attempt after sub attempt and Henderson started gassing.

by Chadx23 on Oct 12, 2009 1:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great fight and I’d like to see Henderson take down Varner, Varner rematch Cerrone, Cerrone kick his ass finally, and rematch Henderson for another classic match. :D

by Sean M on Oct 12, 2009 12:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

and then you’ll wake up! :D

by AzCombat on Oct 12, 2009 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

great fight either way and hats off to cerrone for being classy about it…i don’t necessarily agree with the decision but that’s why they say never leave it up to the judges

by kb on Oct 12, 2009 12:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

the fight was a great close fight, i don’t see why u guys are getting all mad and telling ppl there wrong for there opinion, it was toop close to call, either fighter has a great case and in my opinion its a waste of time to telll ppl why they shud think who we pick matters, telling ppl what u think almost never makes them think wat u think..

by guyverbob on Oct 12, 2009 12:08 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i don’t know, if the sub fails there is no real damage. in fact, the energy the agressor put into the sub often leaves him spent. i think gnp should count for more.

by Conan the Barbarian on Oct 12, 2009 12:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He escaped every submission attempt that definately scores you points

by SlapKO on Oct 12, 2009 12:13 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

he got past most those sub attempts through attrition. that’s like giving a guy points for taking punches square on the jaq and having a good enough chin to survive.

by pug on Oct 12, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, that’s also like scoring points for getting back to the feet. It’s also silly to score for takedowns except for big slams ’cause all it does really is giving you an advantageous position to do something in order to finish/damgage the other fighter, but ALOT of times all the guy do is being defensive escaping sub attempt after sub attempt and just hold the position throughout the fight knowing that he is in “control” in the judges eyes.

by RoBerto on Oct 12, 2009 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1st off, Ii think cerrone won rounds 1, 4 and 5. 2ndly, you would think something this close would have gone to a split decision. Guess we need some more imput from professional judges on how the points are awarded.

by Woodie_525 on Oct 12, 2009 1:10 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There should never be a split decision.

3 judges watching the same fight using the same system of scoring SHOULD always yield a unanimous verdict.

Split decisions are a symptom of a faulty or unclear scoring system and/or poor judging. Therefore we should never want to see a split decision..it doesn’t make sense.

by Ermac on Oct 12, 2009 4:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

right, you should judge every fight by yourself

by shamo84 on Oct 12, 2009 5:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ermac for Judge.

by Ron Konkoma on Oct 12, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What a tremedous backnforth fight and the most amazing escapes I have ever seen (by Henderson), that I wasn’t even thinking about who was winning the fight! The cardio by both these guys was top shelf as well.

by DAVE A on Oct 12, 2009 1:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think this fight really came down to the first round, a lot of people would think Cerrone took the first round, but if you watch it again I think you need to give it to Henderson. Also I think the judges did a good job because all Cerrone really did was submission attempts and Henderson could easily defend those, add the GNP as icing on top. Great judges IMO, Great fight too.

by itsmiguel on Oct 12, 2009 2:18 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it was 48-47 across the board right? Its not like it was lopsided or anything.

I think henderson showed more control in that fight.

Stop your crying! :)

by DubNub on Oct 12, 2009 2:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Spot on man. If your opponent says you beat them… why does anyone in the world even try to argue with that? The dude feels like he lost, that should be it. I mean, Cerrone even said “he definitely won the fight.”

End of story.

Class act Cerrone. I gained alot of respect for you from that one comment. Way to accept defeat graciously.

by enzo-enormous on Oct 12, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn, his voice didnt sound very good. haha Very gracious again tho. Its nice to see that. Sometimes people need to get beat up before they feel gracious… weird

by enzo-enormous on Oct 12, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree 1oo% dubnub…the man said it himself what else do you need?

by joe daddy on Oct 12, 2009 2:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

guida vs henderson. zuffa make it happen somehow.

by kneetotheface on Oct 12, 2009 7:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Couldn’t watch the fight because DirecTV doesn’t have Versus anymore which SUCKS. Anyway I don’t like the way refs score fights in respect to takedowns (which get too much credit) and GOOD TIGHT submission attempts (which seems to almost get nothing). Not only do I think the fighters should get more points for submission attempts, I also think the longer they hold it the more points they should get, just like wrestlers get points for ring control.

by kibbled_bits on Oct 12, 2009 9:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Great fight! Henderson is tough as nails but he never came close to finishing the fight or causing any real damage. Cerrone won rounds 1,4,5 and almost ended the fight on multiple occasions. I don’t understand giving credit to someone for getting out of deep submission attempts. Its the same thing as taking a big shot and not getting knocked out. Cerrone has had a bad gameplan for his last two fights. Too tough for his own good. For some reason he is comfortable to take ground and pound for the opportunity to submit. As sick as his guard is with his transitions it hasn’t gotten the job done in his last two fights. When he listened to Jackson, pressed the fight and shot for the take down himself…good things happened.

by Jason on Oct 12, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Does is really matter that much who won? This was an insane fight and both fighters are going to get the recognition they deserve.

While I agree with the judges decision, I think it is necessary to point out that Henderson looked very gassed by rounds 4 & 5, while Cerrone though beat up looked fresh.

by Spitforce on Oct 12, 2009 10:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow, nice thread. Everybody so far actually stayed on topic for once and had some good comments. It was a great fight. I agree that Henderson didn’t do a lot of damage although I’m sure Cerrone’s face speaks differently today and also didn’t come close to finishing the fight. I think the decision could have gone either way as both fighters had great moments. Cerrone’s being the tight submissions and near stoppages and of course Henderson’s being his never say tap attitude. Incredible toughness and how often have we seen Donald, who’s an aggressive fighter, have to play it very careful with his kickboxing because of the fear of being taken down. And I agree with those who think the takedowns are being given too much weight in the scoring. To me the best example of this now is GSP. I love him as a fighter but in a close fight, he will probably win every time because he is the best at takedowns and pretty much can get them at will. Henderson’s shoots actually were pretty average (being nice) and yet he persisted and usually was able to get Donald down. Cerrone did do better later in the fight as Henderson was not as fresh. Both guys had great conditioning. I think Cerrone was fresher at the end but I wouldn’t say Henderson was “very gassed”. Very gassed is Wes Shivers on the TUF 10 bout.

by sudnvictory on Oct 12, 2009 11:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If GSP is in a close fight we may find out. GSP also doesn’t take people down, let them up just to take them back down for the points. He is trying to finish at all times. If he is on top of a guy for 25 minutes, transitioning to better positions and dropping elbows and punches the entire fight, then the takedowns didn’t win it, the beating he inflicts because of those takedowns win it.

by jay on Oct 12, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

cowboy you definetly won its about inflicting the most damage you obvious did that the henderson guy couldnt even walk out of the stadium on his own two feet. Submition attemps especially good ones should count more points then take downs where no damager is done or the fighter gets back up right after. MMA really had to imporve the fairness of thier judgeing inorder to make it an offical sport like Boxing. Also more fair for strikers who prefer to keep the fight on their feet

by MMA Fan since 2000 on Oct 18, 2009 12:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting on MMA Mania »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images1_small
THE WINTER OF OUR MMA DISCONTENT IS OVER
Us_small
McArthur's 2010 MMAMania Fight Pick'em Pool - UFC 110 Round 5 - and Round 4 RESULTS
Securedownload_small
MONDAY MORNING BLACKBELT
9144-lesnargsp_small
The Undercards Season One Episode 2 RESULTS
2481649810100752951s425x425q85_small
Getting to Know Mania

Recent FanPosts

Mmamania_small
Gray Maynard still not upset about being passed over for title shot against BJ Penn (Video)
Mmamania_small
UFC 110 video trailer: Going 'Down Under' for 'Nogueira vs. Velasquez' on Feb. 20
Techno-viking_small
WEC Quick Quote: Urijah Faber plans on fighting the best guys in the sport regardless of division
Techno-viking_small
Tom Lawlor vs Tim Credeur on tap for UFC 113
Techno-viking_small
Martin Kampmann out, Jake Ellenberger in against Ben Saunders at UFC 111
Mmamania_small
Minotauro Nogueria: Cain Velasquez is not a good submission fighter (UFC 110 video)
Mmamania_small
UFC prospect Phil Davis eager to get 'back in the lab' after winning Octagon debut
Mmamania_small
UFC Undisputed 2010 video game announcement from Dana White
Phish_small
Fantasy Light Heavywweight Tournament Quarterfinal #2
The-return_small
MMA Fashion Apparel Poll

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mmamania_small MMAmania.com

Tomcat_small Jesse Holland

Editors

Small James Iannotti

Andreina-samudio-3_small Akimitsu Kuwabara

Adam_bomb_small Adam Wagner

Techno-viking_small James Kimball

Authors

Small DrubySunshine

Fedorsweater2_small Derek Bolender