All is well on the Dan Henderson and Michael Bisping 'douche bag' front

That’s my pick as well…. Bisping by UD.

wow a lot of people thinking bisping will win!!!

i’ll add to that and say bisping UD

this fight should be good dan will be head hunting in this fight and bisping will try and out box hendo

i think the only way hendo wins is if he gets the clinch on bisping and takes him down …. i dont think he is going to win with the big right hand he has i think bisping is good enough to avoid that just like he avoided leben’s big left hand

I’m not happy to say he will win. But I will give the douche his props. He has very fast hands and although I don’t see KO power, I see him taking the fight to Dan and Hendo will simply run out of steam.

I already bet my $100 to win $300 that Bisping takes a UD!

I still say that Dan will win…but i’ll put money on bizzzbing!

I can defintiely see why people would throw some cash down on Bisping with those odds but I see Hendo outworking Bisping for 3 rounds and really frustrating the brit. I hate Bisping as a person…he’s worse than a douche bag…he’s an enema bag.

I really dont get why people dislike Bisping as a person! I have always enjoyed his personality. I think he has one of the best personalities in the sport, and is by far one of the most under rated fighters out there!

Buster: Imo, I think Bisping is going to be the one to outwork his opponent en route to a Unanimous Decision win!

Bisping gets better and better each day, Henderson gets older and declines each day…U dudes need to get used to seeing Bisping fighting against top MIddleweights because he is turning into a helluva fighter!

John I actually like bizzzbing,I have no problem with is cocky attitude…I’m just realistic and believe that Dan,can control Bizzz the same way he did against Franklin and Page(I know he lost but it was a good close fight).

Here’s hoping your right Alpha and Bizzzzzbing gets another loss on his overbloated with cans record!

It wouldn’t be the same discussing Bisping without an attakdog contribution!

I hate to disappoint!

CasZ-

Truth!

It’s a MUST to have T-Dog on a bizzzzbing thread guys!

BTW T…do you like better K-dog or T…!

Either works for me kid!

Thanks to taking me 10-15y back…sun! ;)

lol

How old are you alpha?

I told you,as hold than you…2nd half of 70s!

Wow you are old!

I know!!!As old than Kev…!

Hey! I was born in the later 70’s too!

We are not old, we are…distinguished.

;)

I’m friggin 30 on sunday, I’m officially 10 years off middle aged, scary!

My uncle always says though, “you’re only as old as the woman you’re feeling”. So that’d make me 21, so that’s some consolation!

TRUTH!

BTW-

Feliz Cumpleanos K-dog!

Is that russian?

LOL. Sorry. Its Spanish.

…for Happy Birthday…

Oh right. You weren’t swearing at me were you?

Damn that I suck in english…I meant “old”…at least you guys are cool enough to not laugh about it!

Yeah guys we got a few old cancer here(especialy kev,t-dog & john…all cancer)!

Oh cheers! no-one ever wished me happy birthday in Spanish before! Are you mexican?

My parents are from Puerto Rico. Small island in the Caribbean with native Spanish speakers.

LOL,I’ll tell you HB Sunday until then…enjoy the last of your remaining 20s!
Yeah I think i’ll go with the K-dog too!

Cool! Didn’t the Ufc go there early on?? The only spanish I know was taught to me at school by Governor Schwarzenegger “Hasta La Vista Baby” lol.

Cheers Alpha!

Alpha-

Your English is fine, man. Don’t sweat it. Writing in a foreign language is one of the more difficult things to do. Trust me, I know your dilemma.

K-Dog-

Yup. Early UFC went to Puerto Rico.

Was it the one where Don Frye KO’d a local legend in like 10 seconds, who claimed he was unbeaten in 500 bare knuckle fights or something?

IDK but that is funny. Unbeaten in 500 bare knuckle fights? The Puerto Rican Kimbo.

LOL !

I appreciate it OJ!

K-Dog…Ramirez??

I think your English is great Alpha….better than some of the English guys. Hell better than the Diaz brothers.

Thanks punch…it’s really appreciable coming from someone knowledgeable,like you!

Yeah Alpha that was the fella. He was awful and clearly a bullsh!tter. There’s no way he could have won all those fights when don frye turns up, half his size and jabs him on the errol flynn and it’s over. P!ss funny though.

I didn’t know the background of this guy!It was a quick KO that’s for sure though!

Bisping’s arrogance occasionally grates, but his high level motivation and overall confidence/arrogance is what has got him to this levelof success. Henderson has been a warrior his whole career, but I’m not sure he has enough left to overcome what Bisping will bring. Bisping will fight tactically and stay away from Henderson’s right hand. I expect Henderson to look to close the distance, dirty box and go for takedowns, but I’ve been impressed over time with Bisping’s ability to scramble, avoid damage and out-stamina his opponents. I’m pulling for Henderson, and don’t find Bisping’s style exciting to watch really, but my gut tells me Bisping will eek out a decision. Hope I’m wrong. Lately I’ve had decent success picking the quicker, more athletic fighter to win, and in this fight I believe that will be Bisping.

Bisping is gonna get pinned to the cage and smashed with right hands. You guys saw the way hendo controlled rampage on the wires. Then clinch TD for some LNP with occasional bombs to cruise into a workmanlike UD.

d’oh!! i should’ve known better!! well sh*t.. t minus 21 days and counting..

NNR: THe Hendo of today isnt as good as the Hendo that fought Rampage.

Bisping will win this fight!

War count!

P. S. I thought I better let you know that I have nothing against poms, I meant that it seems to be that to a lot of Americans it’s one minor reason to dislike him due to the competitive nature of the show — US vs UK — and that typical, universal contention between opposing countries in sport.

I remember someone posting something from Bisping about how they edeit the programme to basically show him as an @sshole and Dan as the good guy. He said there are quite a few things that they leave out and he did fill in the gaps. So when you think he is being arrogant as you put it or a douche bag, there is definately another side to the story.

Yeah, well, I think it’s a given that the show is drastically condensed. It has to be. But what I was saying is that his level of arrogance, to me, is perfectly acceptable. I’m not basing my opinion of him on the show alone either.

I like Bisping just as he is. I have no problem with him.

Yeh Bisping said that they had a big argument over who wanted the early training slot at the start of the show, but this was not shown.
Bisping was willing to let Dan have that early slot but was then not happy to let Dan bend him over when Dan wanted to change.

Bisping stood up for himself and looked like the douche, I think Dan probably got the reaction he wanted from Bisping. Dan’s been in this game a long time and knows how to play the game before the fight starts without overstepping the line.

LOL

I especially like “It will be fun!”

LOL!

Maybe in your world, in my world he has the charisma of a slug.

Stick to High School Musical then. LOL

No thank you, that’s YOUR world. LOL

Haha. Whatever. I’m sure you have a Zac Efron poster in your house with a cum stain keeping it on the wall.

Demarques (or whatever his name is) deserved it anyway. When he said he’d like to fight Bisping in the parking lot I would pay to see that, to see Bisping punch his head in.

The funny thing is that DeMarques and Bisping have similar personalities.

Its interesting to see which one Maniacs “like as a person.”

Similar personalities? Hardly. Even if that were so, they’re still two different people.

They are both mouthy and arrogant. What show were you watching?

LOL.

I suppose so . . . if you only count two traits and disregard the other thousand (figuratively speaking).

Well, literally speaking, due to the editing of the show the two constant variables present were the two aforementioned traits by said fighters.

Hence, even with the possibility of a thousand traits (figuratively speaking) most human beings play up one or two traits to convey a certain character when in front of a TV camera.

To further advance my theory I present the classic archtypes : easy going dude, nice guy, mental case, traitor guy, curmudgeon, happy guy, tough guy, no talent but all heart guy, cocky jerk, etc.

I humbly present the case that both DeMarques and Bisping are two of a kind despite the obviousd fact that both are two wholly separate individuals.

:)

Yeah, and supercalafragalisticexpielladocious. (Wow, look what I did?)

Well, according to your arbitrary and conveniently fabricated “constant variables,” Bisping must have a similar personality to Demarques and have a similar personality to Andre Winner and have a similar personality to David Faulkner and have a similar personality to Cameron Dollar and have a similar personality to Dana White because they all have evinced a semblance of a similar trait at one time or another.

Moreover, your classic archetypes could easily be attributed to almost anyone depending on how you spin it and define it. In that case you could easily attribute Hendo’s personality to being similar to Big Bird’s because he was friendly and supportive or to Eeyore’s because he was reticent and laid back.
To “convey a certain character when in front of a TV camera” doesn’t mean two wholly different people should be suddenly fused together or categorized as having a similar personality just because they’ve displayed a similar emotion or trait.

Finally, since we’re talking of variables, the whole fact of the matter is that it’s subjective opinion; some people hate Bisping because they think he’s a jerk and some like him because they can see there’s more to him than just a “certain character in front of a TV camera.”

“Well, according to your arbitrary and conveniently fabricated "constant variables,"”

 —- I didn’t fabricate this, the TV show did. Reality shows skew just as much as anything else.

“Moreover, your classic archetypes could easily be attributed to almost anyone depending on how you spin it and define it.”

No, that’s why they are classic archetypes. Watch generic action movies or badly written books. The idea will eventually dawn on you.

“Finally, since we’re talking of variables, the whole fact of the matter is that it’s subjective opinion; some people hate Bisping because they think he’s a jerk and some like him because they can see there’s more to him than just a "certain character in front of a TV camera."”

An audience cannot possibly know anything OTHER than what’s presented in front of a camera. What was presented is/was the classic cocky guy for Bisping. Same thing with DeMarques.

You chose to like Bisping and not DeMarques.

That’s your choice but don’t use the “nobody really knows him” argument for Bisping and conveniently drop it for DeMarques.

Its inconsistent.

BTW, this is how you deconstruct an argument.

Have a good day and stay in school.

LOL — I knew you would have to resort to the ol’ “stay in school you teenager” kind of remark. It’s the perennial contingency for those who have nothing of substance to submit.

“don’t use the "nobody really knows him" argument for Bisping and conveniently drop it for DeMarques.”

WTF? READ WITH YOUR EYES OPEN. I didn’t use the “nobody really knows him argument” (whatever that is). Again, another oversimplification by OJR.

You set the parameters, you molded the archetypes how you wanted and fused whichever ones seemed convenient to you. Which pretty much sums up the result of our entire discussion, and I’ll say it again: subjective-frickin-opinion — you infer based on what you saw that Bisping and Damarques have similar personalities because they are both loud-mouthed and arrogant; whereas I infer that this is too simple a foundation to warrant the conclusion that they have similar personalities because there are additional traits, actions and variables that make up their personas. Though they have expressed a similar mannerism at one time or another — they ARE both human beings after all — this is not enough to conclude that their whole personalities should be so recklessly defined and fused together as being similar and put into the same category to be labeled as having “similar personalities.”

To make it simple for you: I don’t think they have similar personalities; you do.

If you say so fruit ;-)

LOL. Does ‘fruit’ mean gay? Haha. Whatever. :)

Yeah lol, just messin with ya pal

Hehe, yeah I know.