Matt Hughes retirement likely on hold with UFC 98 win

"I don't know what I'm going to do. DW (Dana White) and I will get in a room and talk about it. We'll figure it out. I definitely still want to compete. I still think I'm competitive in the weight division."
-- Steve Cofield over at Yahoo!Sports.com transcribes the comments from former welterweight champion Matt Hughes at the UFC 98: "Evans vs. Machida" post-fight press conference regarding his fighting future. The future Hall of Famer reveals that he still has the passion to continue fighting after his unanimous decision win over arch enemy Matt Serra this past weekend despite rampant pre-event speculation that he would hang up the gloves. However, it's very unclear at this time where the 35-year-old veteran fits in the grand scheme of things. Moreover, is his old school smothering "ground and pound" approach to competition going to cut it against younger, faster and more versatile talents such Thiago Alves, Josh Koscheck, Martin Kampmann and Mike Swick, among others? Tell us what you think in the the comments section below ... do you want to see Hughes fight on, and if so, who should he matched up against?
Check out the video after the jump.
0 recs |
75 comments
Comments
pretty loyal too how he said he’s a free agent but
“won’t fight for anyone else!”
I don’t know about that decision, take away the Hughes dry hump session round 2, Serra dominated the fight. I thought it was a body shot that dropped Hughes in the 1st (in real time), not a head butt.
In the 3rd, Serra was attempting submissions from his back and then got a takedown of his own. I guess it was a win for Hughes, but in my opinion it was a lot more quality a loss for Serra!!
by kevin on May 26, 2009 6:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I, on the other hand, do not think he is still competitive in the WW division. Serra won that fight. I’d much rather see Serra fight again than Hughes… or maybe a rematch!
by ---Caesar--- on May 26, 2009 6:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree,I don’t know how it was the “otherhand,” I also had serra winning!
by kevin on May 26, 2009 6:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had Serra winning and was shocked when it was Hughes getting the Unanimous Decision.
Hughes was less confident on his feet, did no damage in Serras guard and got the worse end of the 3rd round and got the UD!!! What the f*ck were the judges watching. Maybe if it was a spilt desision I wouldn’t feel so bad for Serra.
by Ca$z on May 26, 2009 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah i am in agreement. I had Serra taking the fight 29-28.
Couldn’t believe it was a UD for Hughes.
by Nick J on May 26, 2009 7:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude I don’t know how you COULDN’T give that fight to Matt Hughes. I gave Serra round 3, and that was only barely.
Round 1, illegal blow did all the damage, and Hughes threw him through the air, side control, back, rear naked choke. Serra did nothing
Round 2. Hughes gets a takedown, works from Half-guard. Wasnt doing much, but neither was Serra. Why wasn’t he attempting sweeps or retain guard or submissions? Instead he wants to play to the crowd and camera by rolling his eyes. What an idiot.
Round 3. Serra could have gotten somewhere with the omaplata, but was too scared. He rather hold him there and stand up, rather than take a chance at finishing. He did nothing. Weak Triangle. Did nothing in the stand up, which is where he was supposed to “own” Hughes. And finally mounted an offense in the last minute, which consisted of a foot sweep and 3 punches, followed by another half-ass submission attempt that he was too scared to follow through on.
Hughes landed the more punches on the feet too. It was only the occasional jab or jab straight left, but Serra hardly touched him. NO WAY Serra won that fight.
by Synyster on May 26, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
still havent watched the fight, but most of the bloggers on this site that I respect the most, have Serra winning the fight on the scorecards! Happy to hear that Serra put on a show. I said it last week that If Hughes was going to win the fight, it was going to be in a similar fashion to the snoozefest he beat Lytle with……From the sound of things, it sounds like my prediction wasnt too far off…..But I had Serra winning the fight. I even had a $25 bet on the Canoli Dwarf!
I am a big Serra fan and I think he has been improving as a fighter. I look forward to seeing him fight again, and hopefully I dont have to wait another year to see him in the Octagon!
I say GIve Serra the winner of Davis/Hardy!
by john on May 26, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That fight wouldn’t make sense to me John. That winner would seem to be just outside top 5 WW to me, and a fight with Serra wouldn’t do much. Hardy/Davis vs Swick/Saunders for a top 5 position WW
by Synyster on May 26, 2009 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Synyster,
The blow to the back of the head is the critical part. But it wasn’t called so the judges technically shoudl have scored that round for Serra and maybe even 10-8 if they felt Hughes was barely hanging on (which he was.) I, personally, didn’t get too upset that they called it for Hughes because the fight started with a blow to the back of the head, but I was expecting them to call it for Serra.
by Punch You in the Ovaries on May 26, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
prior to what we think Synyster…serra is ranked in the top 10 of most rankings, and has a pretty big name in the fight game, so I think Hardy/Davis do have a lot to gain by fighting/beating Serra. I am a fan of all parties involved but I dont think Serra would be outclassed by either fighter. I think it would make for a great match up.
Then again, I wont complain one bit if the winner of Hardy/Davis faces the winner of Killa B/Swick (which will be the Killa B)!!!!
by john on May 26, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
john-
Bottom line. Hughes stand up looked like garbage. Serra was more aggressive but could not finish Hughes. It actually should have been a draw.
Serra – RD 1
Hughes – RD 2
Draw – RD 3
by OJR on May 26, 2009 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Synyster: Whilst you are entitled to your opinion….I totally disagree with it.
This fight had no clear winner but I felt Serra edged out Round 1 for the reasons PYITO gave and also Round 3.
Serra was more aggressive in the fight on the feet and Hughes looked unsure and 1 dimensional as always.
by Ca$z on May 26, 2009 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
John, I was on the “otherhand” than Hughes, not you
by ---Caesar--- on May 26, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“whilst”…nice work on that sentence ca$z
by McArthur on May 26, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t really think Serra was aggressive at all. I thought he was rather passive and gunshy. He was going to the body alot and not really connecting.
Punch, 10-8?? Come ON man! No way. Maybe if Serra kept landing significant shots the rest of the round, but he only landed like 3 while Hughes was rocked. Hughes recovered VERY well after that incident.
John- Yeah, I know hes in the rankings and got name recognition, but the guy is 0-2 since ‘06? I honestly don’t think a win over him would do much for any of the mentioned. Maybe the loser of one of those fights, but I dont like matching up loser vs loser, especially with good fighters. Example, Nate vs Joe Daddy. Fight will end with one of these 2 upper echelon fighters with either 2 or 3 losses in a row.
And Hardy/Davis vs Swick/Saunders would be a better fight than either vs Serra imo.
Notice I didn’t put Hughes’ name in there. I dont think hes got much left to offer. I think he’ll beat Karo, but anyone else? I cant say I see it happening. Fight Karo in the Mid-West near your hometown, and then retire.
by Synyster on May 26, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How the f..k,people,can possibly believe that Serra won the 1st round??
The,ONLY thing he did is stunning Hughes at the beginning of the roundHughes got a take down,wich nullified the stunning.
Then he got Serra’s back + he did try a RnC!What Serra did after that…Escape…PLEASE
by Alpha Male 360 on May 26, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Becuz Serra escaped that pitiful attempt at a RNC. Nullified, brother. Other than that, that round belonged to Serra. Sorry, dude but we obviously watched 2 different fights. I have no bias towards either fighter.
by OJR on May 26, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed alpah male. Anybody that saw serra winning the fight saw it through very biased eyes. matt hUghes standup sucked…. which I am sure was a huge surprise to everybody (sarcasm) but serra’s standup sucked as well. Serra landed a couple of good shots after the unintentional head butt, butt was still unable to finish an unconcious matt hughes, then Hughes takes him down at will, not doing a lot of damage, but he was punching head and body, for the remainder of the fight. serra couldn’t get anything off standing, and was taken down at will.
hughes won the fight easily. Granted, Matt Hughes dry humped his way to another victory. Sadly, Serra was dry humped into defeat… easily. And was no way fight of the night material, I would have given it to Sherk-Edgar was a much more exciting fight. Serra has no chance at getting the ww belt again and doesn’t sound like he is interested at lw at all. Hughes is not getting the ww belt again, and should stay far away from a remacth with gsp or t alves.
by James S on May 26, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Sherk/Edgar fight wasn’t really a competitive back and forth fight. It wasn’t really exciting either. Just very surprising. Surprising at Edgar’s stand up and Sherk’s dumb gameplan.
by Synyster on May 26, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OJR!Since when that a fighter get point for escaping an attemt??It’s ALWAYS the one who does the sub that got the credit.It’s like that 99% of the time!
AND I DON"T EVEN LIKE EITHER OF THEM!
by Alpha Male 360 on May 26, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well OJR, Hughes escaped Serra’s pitiful finishing abilities, so that is nullified. I may have a bias toward Hughes, but I’m being dead honest with myself. Serra won round 3 and Hughes 1 and 2. I could watch it a thousand times and not understand how Serra gets round 1. Just like I dont see how Hughes could get round 3.
Regardless, I’m left with seeing Serra seem content to play defensive, stall and wait for a stand up instead of doing something himself, half-ass submission attempts, weak finishing abilities on a severely rocked opponent, and still wanting to hold on to this grudge hes got. You could tell when Joe inteviewed him that he still wasn’t over it. If he had won, I bet Serra would still be talking shit.
I just think it was a weak performance by Hughes, and an even weaker performance by Serra. Thats my opinion though.
by Synyster on May 26, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jon Fitch beat Diego by getting out of subs, but he also escaped to better positions on the ground.
But I think submission attempt > submission escape.
by Synyster on May 26, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Synyster and Alpha-
We will agree to disagree. Thanks for your input.
by OJR on May 26, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No problem! :cool:
It seems that the 3 judges saw it the same way we did!
by Alpha Male 360 on May 26, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Matteo Serra won 29/28 in my opinion, but what’s even better is that SErra is the better fighter! He was much better on the feet, Hughes was keeping his hands low and just looked horrible in the standup, and Serra pretty wasn’t in any real trouble at all when Hughes was on top on the ground, he defended real well and they should have been stood up for that in the 2nd IMO… Then in the third he dominated from the bottom with submission attempts and scored a takedown on his own and landed punches with bad intentions which Hughes never did!.. Hughes is done man! His size was the only thing he had on Serra and there are other bigger WW’s that will take Matthew to school!!
by RoB on May 26, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Serra wasn’t in any real trouble at all*
not pretty wasn’t forgot to delete that…
by RoB on May 26, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha. Rob I disagree with literally EVERYTHING you just said. Crazy world of MMA, how 2 (or more) people can watch the same fight and have COMPLETELY opposing views on what happened. lol
by Synyster on May 26, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah that’s cool.. I disagree with the scoring for getting out of subs and getting back to the feet after being taken down, the only reason they got there is because their opponent put them there and that should score wayy more points! like the Fitch fight, he lost the ground fight even if he was on top and all he did was escaping Diego’s subs..
by RoB on May 26, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kevin i rented the fight and have it on DVR it was a headbutt and hit to the back of the head that dropped hughes. I thought it was over but in typical matt hughes fashion he hung on some how. I think this really took the wind out of him though. He would of destroyed him otherwise. But he came back and made the first round close after he took serras back. Not sure if you can count 2 illegal strikes on the score card or not. Hughes won the fight hands down.
by mak on May 26, 2009 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know it was a head butt, I’m not a moron bro, watch it in real time, not slow motion after the fact! it looks like a body shot. no one, not even Jesus christ himself saw the head butt until they slowed down the replay!
by kevin on May 26, 2009 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree OJR, but it’s a 10 point MUST system!
by kevin on May 26, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the unintentional head butt set up the body shot so your both right cause imo it wasn’t much of a head butt
by McArthur on May 26, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i didn’t think so either, but a body shot would drop him, not knock him out, and he was clearly ko’d!
by kevin on May 26, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kevin-
True. I forgot. In that case I give it to Serra by a slim margin.
by OJR on May 26, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree. the 2 takedowns in the third nullify each other, and serra did way more from his back than hughes did on top! Serra won rds. 1 and 3!!!
the head butt counts as a knock down guys. The judges watch a fight like us, in real time, so it looked like serra dropped him with a body shot! It was a glancing blow (which is all it takes).
by kevin on May 26, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure. put him up against one of the younger guys. Swick or Kos. see what happens. he wont get a belt again sure, but if he wants to try and smash up some kids.. why not!
by eightyproof on May 26, 2009 6:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hughes vs. hazellete – hazellete by decision /tko
hughes vs. condit – hughes by decision
hughes vs. kampmann – hughes by decision
hughes vs. rumble johnson – rumble by ko/tko
hughes vs. swick – swick by decision
hughes vs. kos – kos by decision
hughes vs. davis – hughes by decision
hughes vs. parisyan – hughes by decision
hughes vs. fitch – fitch by decision
by jace on May 26, 2009 6:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There are definately some good matchups for him as I dont think losing to GSP and Alves should be the end for him although the way he lost with such a poor performance sure made it seem like the end of the road at the time.
As much as I dislike Hughes I don’t like seeing former great champions ruin their legacy by competing past their sell-by date so if the old hughes doesn’t at least come in to compete then I say he should retire.
He REALLY needs to work on his hands thats for sure. Even against Serra he looked uncomfortable and unconfident so I see him having real problems with the middle to top end of the division otherwise.
I would really love to see him against another powerful wrestler like Kos, Johnson or even Fitch or maybe someone who works really well off their back like Hazelett, Condit or Kampmann to make him have to work in all areas and not get away with lying on people.
by Ca$z on May 26, 2009 7:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Based on his performance against Serra I think Matt can only beat one guy on that list, Parisyan.
Hughes was awful, maybe it’s ring rust, age or the training camp or perhaps a bit of everything. If he doesn’t think he can do better he should pack it in.
I will say perhaps the clash of heads took a lot out of him.
by RobH86 on May 26, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He can forget about rematches with Georges and Thiago. They’d only end badly for him.
by RobH86 on May 26, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is done. The only thing he did was get two take downs. One was a dry hump session, the other was Serra attemping to submit him. Hughes’ stregth was always ground and pound and he does not have that anymore. I don’t want to see another “boring a$$ wrestler” in the ufc anymore.
by IrishMike on May 26, 2009 6:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he was never the same fighter after the gsp 2 fight..in my opinion, physically his the same fighter, the problem is his self belief was zap and a fighter without confidence is like an injured one, its more mental really, some fighters get through devastating losses (eg george st. pierre,forrest griffin, randy coutore) and some fighters look a ghost of their former self (rich franklin)..
by jace on May 26, 2009 7:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I personally don’t understand the thinking of staying with UFC at this point, It’s time for Hughes to move on. I think if he went to a company like Strikeforce he would help grow the sport of MMA. Jake Shields would finally get a opponent in the WW Division with a decent name and at this point I just don’t see Matt winning against the top guys @ welterweight in the UFC.
by markie on May 26, 2009 7:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Serra won that fight? Are you serious? Look at both of their faces in the post fight. Serra could not even take advantage of the accidental headbutt that stunned Hughes. They both look awful but Serra did not even look in shape. He got one take down at the end of the fight. That was it. They better both be ready to take some beatings if they continue. But no way honestly can anyone say Serra won that fight. I still think he lost round one. That was when Hughes did the most damage.
by nik on May 26, 2009 7:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You’d make a good judge nik….for a blind man.
by Ca$z on May 26, 2009 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what I think is funny, Serra clearly won round 1, but some guys that scored it 29-28 HUGHES, had Serra winning round 3. He definitely won the fight! I had him winning rounds 1 and 3. Even on his back in round 3, he did more than Hughes. Then, Serra’a take down nullified Hughes’s earlier take down!
by kevin on May 26, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there is definately a bias against hughes here. look at serra’s face and at hughes. take the head butt and punch to the back of the head away and all you have is sub attempts from bottom and a last minute take down which serra could not do anything with. i see hughes fighting Karo next.
by kneetotheface on May 26, 2009 7:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hughes vs. hazellete – hazellete by decision /tko
hughes vs. condit – hughes by decision
hughes vs. kampmann – Kampmann by Splitdecision
hughes vs. rumble johnson – rumble by ko
hughes vs. swick – swick by KO
hughes vs. kos – kos by KO
hughes vs. davis – hughes by Splitdecision
hughes vs. parisyan – KARO by Splitdecision
hughes vs. fitch – fitch by KO
Hughes vs. Serra – Serra via Splitdecision
Hughes vs GSP – GSP via Ruthless Decision
Hughes vs BJ – BJ via Unanimus Decision
Hughes vs Jake Shields – Shields via Decision
Not really exciting fights unless they end in KO of Hughes…
by SHAMWOW on May 26, 2009 7:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
GSP via decision? What made you think Hughes wouldn’t get KTFO or submitted again? GSP has only gotten better and better while Hughes is on the decline and if GSP was able to easily handle the Hughes of 06 then I’m pretty sure he could do it now.
And you have Fitch by ko?..Um..how exactly?…
by Billybob on May 26, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously this was an easy to score fight. Serra won round 1 – due mainly to an accidental head butt and Hughes won rounds two and three due to controlling where the fight took place. It was a close decision but not a controversial one.
I’d much rather Hughes called it a day, this was the only fight that really means anything; he can’t compete with GSP and Alves so what’s the point of putting him in there against the younger fighters? I’m just keeping my fingers crossed that Dana doesn’t agree to give him a rematch against the loser of the GSP vs. Alves fight, if he does continue and wants another crack at the championship he will have to prove that he’s deserving of his shot!
by wolfman on May 26, 2009 7:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well said Wolfman. I would like to see Hughes face kos. I don’t think he can beat Kos at this point in his career but if it was more a wrestling match it would be fun to watch. Kos would tear him up on his feet though.
by brac on May 26, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nik your 100 % correct. If you think serra won that fight then i think maybe you just started watching mma and maybe your a serra fan. :)
by mak on May 26, 2009 8:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The future Hall of Famer reveals that he still has the passion to continue fighting after his unanimous decision win over arch enemy Matt Hughes this past weekend .
I think you meant to say Matt Serra DA. Anyway, Hughes needs to retire before he ends up like Chuck. Serra is gay.
by mikehunt on May 26, 2009 8:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He in no way looked impressive, he needs to retire before he becomes the ww punching bag, go out with a little bit of dignity, at least.
by Dragon on May 26, 2009 8:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Even though the announcer raised Hughes hand at the end of the fight i think he lost. It was a piss poor performance from Hughes. I dont see him in any runnning for the belt in the future nor do i care to see. That fight was a draw!
by danny_c on May 26, 2009 8:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You must not know the way they score mma fights. That fight was easy 29-28 for Hughes and if it had not been for the illegal head butt, he would have been 30-27 imo.
by brac on May 26, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d rather not see Hughes or Serra fight again.
by BigRedOne on May 26, 2009 9:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m with you on that one. Hughes is THE most boring fighter I’ve seen in the past two years, and he has absolutely no striking game (and obviously has no plans to try and obtain one). Serra is slightly more entertaining, more from his personality than his fighting. I thought it was lame that those two jackoffs kissed and made up after two years of “dick” insults. If I was Serra, I’d be even more pissed. The only thing I might watch would be a re-match, and only IF it was a Fight Night headliner and for free!
by slim473 on May 26, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if Matt Hughes wants to get paid at this point of his career for just laying on top of other men, then I can think of the perfect job for him.
It’s said a few years back I actually liked Hughes better than Sera. What was I thinking? Hughes is a holier-than-thou prick and Sera is the kind of guy you could hang around with or drink beer with.
by kibbled_bits on May 26, 2009 9:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was not impressed with his performance.
by Belisarius on May 26, 2009 10:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he is a dinosaur and has not evolved..yes he WAS a champ and held the belt..but, he refuses to be anything new..going to another company would help him and other mma business..
by sarah on May 26, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If I was Hughes I wouldn’t want to start over in another company at this point of his career and at his age. I’d probably do just what he is going to do and fight in a company he help build a few more times and then hang it up.
by brac on May 26, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hughes didn’t look great but he controlled the pace throughout. He shouldn’t be marked down for the accidental headbutt and punch to the back of the head in R1 and easily won R2, so I don’t see where the controversy is. I hate Hughes and am a Serra fan but even I have to admit that he deserved to win a decision.
I want to see Hughes face another top 10 guy, someone coming off a loss like Kos or on the fringes like the Hardy/Davis or Swick/Saunders winners, I don’t see Hughes winning any of these fights but he’s a big name and should face decent competiton not named GSP or Alves, otherwise why bother still competing in the UFC.
by David W-S on May 26, 2009 11:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Put him in there agains anyone in the division and he still has a chance
by chris on May 26, 2009 12:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boy there are alot of biased Serra nuthuggers on here. Even though I like Hughes more between these two guys, I can look at the fight with an unbiased opinion. I gave the 1st round to Serra because the ref. didn’t see the head butt and the punch to the back of the head, but I gave it to him just slightly. If the ref had of seen the head butt and stopped the action to give Hughes time to recover from an illegal blow, then I would have given the first round to Hughes. He not only got the take down, he took Serra’a back. Second round was Hughes all the way, it wasn’t even close. Third round, Hughes won atleast 3 minutes of that round with Serra winning maybe the last 1 minute. Hughes would have won the round more easlily if the ref. had not stood them up. I had it 29-28 Hughes easy! It could have been 30-27 if not for the illegal head butt.
People get on Hughes for being boring and the lay and pray. But that’s the beauty of mma. Everyone knows Serra is the better striker, but don’t be mad at Hughes for doing what he does best and taking the fight to the ground. You want to be mad, be mad at Serra for not being able to stop the take down. Serra is to small for the 170 lb class and it sounds like he likes pasta to much to make 155.
by brac on May 26, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ive got to say, I hope he calls it a day. I just cant see him competing with any of the “newer” wave of fighters in the top 10 of UFC WW devision now. Please dont fizzle out with a string of L’s.
by UK_Chris on May 26, 2009 1:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Matt Hughes still competitive against who? A natural LW? I had Serra winning the fight by split decision. It’s unfortunate that hump fests mean you win a fight, even though the guy on bottom is prolly working harder.
by xxBAxx816 on May 26, 2009 3:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Matt Hughes still competitive against who? A natural LW? I had Serra winning the fight by split decision. It’s unfortunate that hump fests mean you win a fight, even though the guy on bottom is prolly working harder.
by xxBAxx816 on May 26, 2009 3:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Personally i think hughes should retire ASAP…I think chuck has a better chance to make another good run. He barely won. and in my opinion serra won that fight. Hughes lost his speed, strength, and reaction time.
by Arroyo13 on May 27, 2009 2:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















