Thales Leites vs Alessio Sakara fight on tap for UFC 101

The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) must want to see how far along the Brazilian jiu-jitsu skills of former Italian boxer-turned mixed martial artist, Alessio Sakara, have come since his submission loss to Dean Lister back in 2006.
That's because ground specialist and former number one middleweight contender, Thales Leites, will fill-in for the injured black belt, Rousimar Palhares, at UFC 101 at the Wachovia Center in Philadelphia, Pa., on August 8, according to a report from Intheguard.tv.
"Toquinho" suffered a tibia fracture during training that required surgery and was forced out of competition, which opened up a slot for Leites. And he'll more than likely attempt to make a lasting impression after his most recent lackluster performance against middleweight champion Anderson Silva at UFC 97: "Redemption" last month.
Leites was able to do what no man has done up until this point -- survive five rounds with "The Spider." But that's all he seemed there to do because there was very little offense for 25 minutes. In fact, he basically played keep-away once he realized that he would be unable to implement his slick jiu-jitsu skills.
The performance did not go over well with the public at large, as well as UFC executives, including company president Dana White, who admitted at the post-fight press conference that he was "embarrassed." Leites had five wins in six attempts prior to the loss, three of which came via submissions. He'll likely look to add to that total when he tangles with "Legionarious."
Sakara is coming off a brutal knockout of Joe Vedepo via head kick at UFC Fight Night 15 back in September 2008. It was an eye-opening finish from the heavy-handed American Top Team product to say the least.
He was set to lock horns with Jake Rosholt at UFC Fight Night 17 on Feb. 7, 2009, until a late shoulder injury forced him off the card. He was then penciled in to clash with Alan Belcher at UFC 99 before "The Talent" was promoted to a showdown opposite big free agent acquisition, Yoshihiro Akiyama.
The former light heavyweight is currently (2-2) in his last four bouts and the same during his three-year career (4-4, 1 NC) with the UFC. Sakara — who historically struggles against higher-level competition — has been branded a gatekeeper of the division.
A big win on August 8 could go a long way in peeling off that label.
UFC 101 will likely feature a main event between lightweight champion BJ Penn and number one contender Kenny Florian, as well as UFC Middleweight Champion Anderson Silva, stepping up once again to compete at light heavyweight against former 205-pound champion, Forrest Griffin, in a three-round, non-title special attraction.
For more on UFC 101, including rumored bouts and all other event-related news, click here.
57 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is this one of those “striker vs. grappler” bouts I’ve been hearing about?
by mburtoni on May 11, 2009 8:23 PM EDT reply actions
Even with Thales’ poor performance vs. Anderson Silva…there is NO WAY that Sakara’s striking is better than Nate Marquardt. Sakara may have better straight up boxing than Nate, but, that’s not gonna bother Thales much.
Takedown, sub, call it a day…round 1.
by TabascoSAUCE on May 11, 2009 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions
heres to hoping youre completely wrong and sakara knocks mr reverse takedown out of the ufc
by brendan on May 11, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Could this be the first time a fighter goes from main event title shot to undercard in one fell swoop? Hope so, but they’ll probably put it on the main card and bump Grove/Almeida to the preliminary.
Leites will take Sakara down and sub him, but I hope Sakara knocks that chickenshit’s head into the nosebleeds.
by Jeremyjackson on May 11, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Absolutely agreed. I do not get at all pumped to see Leites fight. Sakara on the other hand, while he doesn’t have the world’s greatest record, I can’t ever remember being bored during one of his fights. I’d like to see him stick around in the UFC, win or lose. He’s makes for potentially exciting matchups with a number of other middleweights, like Herman, Quarry, Kang, etc. I’d like to see Sakara fight any of those guys.
by mburtoni on May 11, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions
lest we forget john fitch already
by Clinton Jackson (formerly Jared) on May 11, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions
JJ, although unnecessary, Jon Fitch vs Gono at 94 was the undercard, and it was one fight removed from the GSP fight.
So no, its not the first time its happened.
Wait, did Riggs go undercard after the Hughes fight?
by Synyster on May 11, 2009 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions
wow, another great match up!! I’m psyched!
.
I want to thank those of you helping out with this suite! I just put up way more money than I wanted to (you did too Rick and OJR) on a bunch of guys I don’t knows word! 350 each for the suite, once I get the tickets, I’ll be putting whatever is left on stub hub for a lot more than that…and I know they’ll sell considering floor seats (not including catering) are gonna be expensive! email me guys
kevjack115@yahoo.com
by kevin on May 11, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Leites is getting cut if he loses this by some miracle.
by NameNotRequired on May 11, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Good call guys, I forgot about how Dana screwed Fitch for not jumping though his hoops fast enough.
Fitch was coming off a gutsy performance where he left everything in the cage. Leites deserves to be on the undercard.
by Jeremyjackson on May 11, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m with you on that one brendan! Besides Sakara’s crisp stand-up, his tatts are my favorite among MMA fighters.
by Syd[a.k.a."the Negation"] on May 11, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Sakara FTW!!! would be a shame if he lost to the most boring MW ever that deserves to be cut no matter how many times he win..
by RoB on May 12, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Im a die hard Sakara fan…he is basically the only Roman fighter I have to root for…but If Im keeping it real, he has nO SHOT against Thales!
I will be betting big money on thales for sure!
by john on May 12, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Are you kidding me Sakara has way better striking then Marquardt.. hes a pro boxer.
by BMO on May 11, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions
MMA aint just boxing, there’s a clue in the name, particularly the “mixed” part. I dont remember seeing many Sakara pro boxing matches on the tv, which tells me he wasn’t very good, so we’re not talking about the next Bernard Hopkins.
Why this idiot’s stil in the UFC is beyond me, he’s lost to anyone who’s remotely top 30. Dana must be keeping him on as an Italian posterboy for when UFC goes to Italy. That’s the only explanation.
by attakdog on May 12, 2009 4:26 AM EDT up reply actions
The topic was Sakara’s striking not his MMA. I think most people here realise that MMA isn’t just boxing, and that Marquardts overall MMA skill is much better than Sakaras’. I do not see where Marquardts’ striking is better than Sakaras’, even though Marquardt has improved. Sakara is an excellent striker, if he had connected with the strikes that he hit Leban and McFedries with on any other fighters they would more than likely have been knocked out. Leban and McFedries just happen to have heads of granite. I doubt Leites would be able to take that sort of punishment. I think Sakara will stuff the takedowns, catch him and knock him out.
by Ade on May 13, 2009 7:07 AM EDT up reply actions
The man above me was deducing that Sakara was “way better at striking” than Marquadt based purely on the fact that he used to be a pro boxer. Being an ex pro boxer does not make you a brilliant MMA striker. If it were the case Bernard Hopkins, RJJ and Ricky Hatton would all hold UFC belts. That is the point I was trying to make if you bothered reading.
by attakdog on May 13, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
I actually did read what you wrote but just happen not to agree with you and do not understand your logic. Why wouldn’t a proffesional striker be better than an MMA striker. Most if not all MMA strikers are coached or trained by boxing coaches to improve there striking abilty and technique, Rampage is a good example of this. And Bernard, Roy and Hatton would outstrike any fighter in MMA, but they would not hold UFC belts if they did not posses skills in other areas such as wrestling or BJJ, but as far as striking is concerned, they would destroy anyone.
by Ade on May 14, 2009 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions
This reminds me of Drew Mcfedries vs Thales. hmmm.
by RyanHobbs on May 12, 2009 2:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah man, this is an EASY fight to predict. As is anytime Sakara fights someone with any belt above white in BJJ and a 1/2 way decent chin. Leites is known for 2 things. His BJJ and his chin.
All In on Thales!
by ViolentMike on May 12, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
u know Im the biggest Sakara fan around…but Im betting the BANK on Leites!
by john on May 12, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Jesus, bit harsh on Alessio .. I almost hope he KO’s Leites.
by DownUnder on May 11, 2009 9:20 PM EDT reply actions
After seeing Thales Leites fight Anderson Silva. I want Sakura to win. Thales needs to realize what he is fighting for because he was scared of Silva.
Silva on the other hand, I hope he loses to Griffin because I’m tired of seeing him dance in the ring.
by skelow on May 11, 2009 9:33 PM EDT reply actions
Does a loss by Alessio Sakara mean he would be cut by the UFC?
by torresisawarrior on May 11, 2009 10:12 PM EDT reply actions
Probabaly, I think the intention of the UFC in booking this fight is to cut Sakara, because they can’t get rid of him until he loses and putting him against a BJJ specialist twice is a clear sign that they expect him to lose. Having said that, after Leites’ last display he’ll be cut if he loses this one and I can’t say that I would miss him.
by David W-S on May 12, 2009 6:02 AM EDT up reply actions
What’s the odds of Joe Rogan hyping Leites as “only person to go 5 rounds with Anderson Silva”
by kibbled_bits on May 11, 2009 10:14 PM EDT reply actions
Unfortunately, Leites deserves no credit whatsoever for his “performance” at 97 but no doubt that Rogan will hype him up.
by David W-S on May 12, 2009 5:52 AM EDT up reply actions
no and he will even go on to defend Leites performance in some way… but hey, if Rogan wasn’t working for the UFC it might’ve been a different story
by RoB on May 12, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Why was Leites boring? He stood and striked with Nate? He was smart and didn’t get his head taken off agasint Silva, so what? Fact is Thales played it smart tried to get Silva to do his game, but it didn’t work. If Thales would of stood there and striked with Silva and got KO’ed, all you guys woulda been like hes so dumb for striking with Silva. Eaither way I like Thales, Round 1 sub.
by ItsJustMe on May 11, 2009 10:35 PM EDT reply actions
no one asked leites to strike with silva. however, if you want to get the fight to the ground, you have to engage on even a minimal level and work to get it where you want it. not just fall on your butt and expect your opponent to happily fall into your gaurd. big difference.
by JB on May 12, 2009 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions
“playing it safe” is for chess nerds. Be a man and go down swinging, you are a professional fighter after all.
by scissorfight on May 12, 2009 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions
The whole point of a fight is to win not survive, why bother turning up for a title fight if you don’t care about winning. If Thales deserves his title shot then he would have at least varied his technique when it became clear that he couldn’t take Anderson down, instead he lay on the floor. There’s a difference between fighting smart a la Machida and not fighting period a la Leites.
by David W-S on May 12, 2009 5:54 AM EDT up reply actions
oh yeah and being there live to see him again attempt his slide tackle on Anderson in what was it the 4th round was just great.
dont get me wrong I respect these guys a ton but if you’re in a main event title fight you go all out
by torresisawarrior on May 11, 2009 11:15 PM EDT reply actions
Leites VS. Starnes in a 3 round staring contest. First one to break a sweat loses!
by scoob on May 12, 2009 2:43 AM EDT reply actions
I feel sorry for Sakara, the UFC are blatantly trying to cut him by putting him in fights against BJJ specialists. Alessio is an exciting fighter with dangerous striking but he has no ground skills whatsoever, so to be put up against Palhares then Leites shows that the UFC want him to lose.
I’d laugh if Sakara KO’d that joke Leites, it would serve the UFC right for trying to put on a mismatch in order to cut a fighter, as well as make up for that dreadful performance by Leites against Silva. Realistically I see Leites submitting Sakara in R1 but I’ll be cheering for the Italian in this one.
by David W-S on May 12, 2009 6:00 AM EDT reply actions
This is the “nail in the coffin” for sakara, he loses, he’s out. Ufc’s middleweight division needs a whole new make over. Theres only a hand full of fighters who might give Silva a run for his title.
by WillyD on May 12, 2009 8:46 AM EDT reply actions
I’m rooting for Sakara as well. He has way more than enough time to sharpen up his takedown defense skills. Spider proved that if you stuff Thales takedowns you completley shut him down. Sakara should be watching the silva/Leites fight 5 times a day, and then hitting the gyms with some wrestlers.
by danny_c on May 12, 2009 9:03 AM EDT reply actions
You dont think Sakara vs Silva would be sweet to watch??? Both stand up fighters and silva sure as hell wont take the fight to the gournd..
by What? on May 12, 2009 9:15 AM EDT reply actions
Sakara had the shit banged out of him by Chris Leben in no time. Leben had the shit kicked out of him by Silva in record time. Seriously what chance would Sakara have???? Nothing, it wouldn’t last 30 seconds!
by attakdog on May 12, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions
About which part??? It’s all irrelevant anyway, Sakara will get no nearer a shot at Anderson Silva than Kimbo will.
by attakdog on May 12, 2009 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Silva vs Sakara.
Its no discussion. Anderson Silva would predetermine the exact round/minute/second that he wants the fight to end, and he would end the fight then.
by ViolentMike on May 12, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
fair enough but he didn’t exactly have the sh’t banged out of him by Leben, Sakara probably hit Leben twice as much as Leben hit him, and if Sakara would have had the Bisping gameplan he would’ve won for sure!! but Bisping’s fight against Leben was also horrible because of that.. Sakara is a much better striker than Leben!
by RoB on May 12, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s not like Henderson or Leites are better strikers than Sakara..
by RoB on May 12, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Didn’t look that way to me pal when he was seeing stars. Fair play to him for having a go though and not going down the Bizbing route. I don’t think Sakara’s anywhere near as technical a striker as Bizbing however, so not sure that option was open to him anyway.
Clearly Hendo’s not a better boxer, but MMA striking is very different to just straight up boxing. Hendo’s arguably a better MMA striker than him, just look at the guys he’s KO’d compared to Sakara?? Leites clearly isn’t a better striker but willdestroy him on the ground.
by attakdog on May 12, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions
we’re just talking striking here no ground game.. Hendo has an amazing chin and punches really hard, but Alessio is clearly more technical than him..
by RoB on May 12, 2009 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t see how you can say he’s a more technical striker, the guy’s sparked out a few bums but as soon as he fights someone who’s top 30 he comes up way short. We’re not talking about the next Machida here.
by attakdog on May 13, 2009 5:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Thales will sub this groundless boxer!! His chin is solid and Sakara stand-up is overrated.
by Pimp_man on May 12, 2009 12:40 PM EDT reply actions
what a incredibly lame way of dana to force fighters out of the organisation.. what is logic about this matchup. (none)
Sakara all the way! i hope Sakara Submits (yes submit) him just to screw with dana. bah
by MMA040 on May 12, 2009 12:54 PM EDT reply actions
ok guys, remember sakara was submitted 2 TIMES, one of them by Dean Lister in ufc 60 (27/5/2006), so like you said guys, a fighter who is submitted more than 2 times,he’s shit??…..he joined the American Top Team in 2008, the fight against thales leites will happen on august 8,2009…..guys….do you think that sakara didn’t train takedown defence with ATT??? common! sakara is not STUPID,for sure he will train very hard for this fight, and remember sakara almost destroyed chris leben befor he was knocked out ( watch the fight..), and you all guys know that chris leben has the best chin in this division,so listen what Leben said to Joe Rogan in ufc 82!….ALSO, Anderson silva didn’t want to knock out Leites BECAUSE Leites is brazilian , he’s like his brother so he didn’t want to hurt him, so he decided to win the fight by decision, if it was Franklin or someone else he would beat him in the first round. what i want to say is that leites doesn’t have good chin than chris leben and Sakara is not Drew mcfedries who was submitted easily…
by karim on May 12, 2009 1:52 PM EDT reply actions

by 





























