CSAC appends rule book to allow 'No Decision' for positive drug tests

The California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) made several changes to its rules and regulations late Monday evening regarding combat sports to help keep pace with the growth of mixed martial arts and its constantly evolving environment.
Of particular interest is Rule 368, which permits the Commission to change a victory to a "no decision" in a case where a fighter tests positive for banned substances following an event.
It should be noted however that said change is not automatic and will be handled on a case-by-case basis.
Here is the complete list of rule changes as stated by the CSAC:
Rule 227: Arbitration Procedures
This rule change formalizes the process for athletes and managers/promoters engaged in a contract dispute arbitrated by CSAC and the AG's Office. Forms will be available online very shortly that must be submitted in order to request arbitration.Rule 281: Physical Condition of Boxer
This rule change specifies guidelines related to the condition of an athlete prior to licensure.Rule 303: Administration of Use of Drugs
This rule change specifies that any athlete who has previously tested positive for anabolic agents or drugs of abuse must provide a "clean" drug test as a condition of licensure prior to being licensed or having his or her license renewed. Additionally, the rule clearly defines the classifications of drugs that are tested for.Rules 314 and 523: Alternate Ring Specifications
This rule change allows pro and amateur boxing, pro and amateur kickboxing, and mixed martial arts to be held in the five roped ring at the same event.Rule 323: Bandages
This rule change permits 10 yards of tape and 20 yards of bandage for each hand as part of the handwrap.Rule 368: Change of Decision
This rule change states that a positive drug test will permit the Commission to change a victory to a "no decision." This rule change will apply to drugs of abuse on a case by case basis.Rule 389: Appeal Procedures
This rule change formalizes the process for athletes in an appeal hearing for a suspension or fine by CSAC. The community wanted it, well, the community gets what they asked for (a formal procedure for appeals written into California law spreading the time equally between both the Attorney General and the athlete's representation). Forms will be available online very shortly that must be submitted in order to request an appeal hearing.
Under the rule change fighters who previously tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs must now provide a negative drug test in order to have his or her license renewed.
Despite the clear language, I'm sure it won't be long until these rules are applied to as fighter who tests dirty. It hasn't seemed to deter them under any other commission.
Karo Parisyan vs. Dong Hyun Kim at UFC 94: "St. Pierre vs. Penn 2" comes to mind.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m glad they are gonna take it on a case by case basis! That said, I’ve always believed that, if found guilty, it should go on the fighter’s record as a loss(By disqualification.)
by Dana's a CrossDresser on Apr 8, 2009 10:11 AM EDT reply actions
CSAC is CRAP! They need to be completely dismantled and just start from scratch! THats why I dont even listen to the crap they say about Aleks…because they have ZERO credibility!
by john on Apr 8, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree, they suck! C-ommunist S-tate A-thletic C-ommission should be replaced by a board that has common sense and reasonability! Furthermore, the panel should include several fighters so that somebody in there has a clue as to WTF they’re talking about! Maybe Mania should throw a coup d’etat and take their place!
by Dana's a CrossDresser on Apr 8, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Everything here needed to be said. I will forever continue to bash the CSAC, the vancouver commission, the florida commission and a couple other ones until they are rebuilt from scratch like john said.
by NameNotRequired on Apr 8, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions
then let it be known that the CSAC is the comittee that has forever tainted sherk’s reputation…after he passed 3 polygraph tests, and offered a blood test but the CSAC refused (since only his urine tested positive for increased levels of the natrual substance that is in every persons body), the CSAC simply reduced his suspension instead of revoking it.
by Andrew on Apr 8, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
when’s CSAC gonna make append rule# 3905? that’s the one which states: “any regulatory body governed by a punch of pussies and incompetents will be dissolved.”
by joeyvitaminb12 on Apr 8, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
C-alifornia S-tate A-@@hole C-ommitee!
by Dana's a CrossDresser on Apr 8, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions

by 




























