Rashad Evans to find kinks in Lyoto Machida's armor possibly at UFC 98

Props: Sherdog.com
Quoteworthy:
"The kid’s been phenomenal. He’s been better than phenomenal. He’s been looking better every fight. But that’s the fight business. That’s the fun part about a fight is the fact that you go in there with an opponent that sometimes seems insurmountable. But then you figure it out and that makes the victory that much sweeter. With that said, there may be some kinks in his armor that I have yet to see that I can exploit when I look at the tapes more closely. Nobody’s unbeatable. Machida’s been looking slicker than I don’t know what, but everybody has a weakness even if you do look slick as oil. Everyone has a weakness."
UFC Light Heavyweight Champion Rashad Evans talks about undefeated division contender, Lyoto Machida. "Sugar" feels that despite an epic post-UFC 96 jawing session with Quinton "Rampage" Jackson this weekend that at the end of the day he'll fight the quirky Brazilian at UFC 98 on May 23. Evans is basing this assumption, however, on Jackson's remarks about the fight possibly being too soon and that he wanted more time for lingering injuries to heal. If Jackson wants the fight it is his to take, but Machida is patiently waiting in the wings if the Memphis, Tenn., native passes on the opportunity to reclaim his 205-pound title in two months, which would be his third fight in five months. We should know one way or the other very soon.
0 recs |
170 comments
Comments
I can’t wait. Either if its Rashad – Rampage or Rashad – Machida, it will be great!
by Kriss on Mar 10, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
its funny how he says “no one is unbeatable”, since his record has yet to feel a loss
by tonydanza on Mar 10, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is that funny?
Lyle “Fancy Pants” Beerbohm is undefeated at 9-0. Does that mean he should feel like he is unbeatable as well?
by ViolentMike on Mar 10, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its only funny to me because this statement goes both ways, just because Machida has weakness’s doesn’t mean he’ll get to them before Machida gets to his.
by O damn he got caught on Mar 10, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rashad is going to find Machida’s weaknesses the same way he finds everyone else’s: by deploying Jardine as an advance scout to fight Machida before Rashad has to fight him.
by PW on Mar 10, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“Rashad is going to find Machida’s weaknesses the same way he finds everyone else’s: by deploying Jardine as an advance scout to fight Machida before Rashad has to fight him”
I’ve read too many posts like this lately and the logic behind it is terribly skewed. Neither Rashad nor Jardine nor his camp nor their managers pick who to fight. The opponents are picked by the UFC and then offered to the respective fighter.
At best a fighter or their management will refuse a fight for one or another but that’s it.
If you have an issue with how it’s been playing out with opponents that Jardine & Rashad have in common and the fact that Jardine has faced them 1st then talk about the real issue which is with the UFC and Joe Silva. Do you think they don’t know that Jardine & Rashad fight & train in the same camp together and compete in the same weight class?
by Machine on Mar 10, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude don’t diss Fancy Pants. This guy is on a roll and has some good stuff.
by DDT on Mar 10, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rashad and Jardine are like “Shake and Bake” from Talledega Nights.
Jardine takes the fall so that his buddy Rashad can win…
“Shake and Bake baby! Shake and Bake!!!”
by yoshi on Mar 10, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
totally!!!
its not that rashad is doing something wrong by only fighting people after jardine. its just an unfair advantage!
by COR on Mar 10, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nah, “its not shake and bake anymore, im the magic man now! not ya see me, now im gone!”
by brendan on Mar 10, 2009 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Machine, i thought i was crazy for thinking that but it’s nice to see that i am not the only one wearing a tin foil hat haha!!
by NameNotRequired on Mar 10, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL thanks for the validation NNR. After no one posted a response to it all day I started questioning myself too.
by Machine on Mar 10, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, off topic I know but, does anybody know when UFC 100 tickets will be available, and why some are already on sale from Stubhub?
by Jrandolph on Mar 10, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rampage has no reason to rush….let the Dragon and Rashad fight in May and Rampage will the number 1 guy late this summer.
by Robert(1) on Mar 10, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree 100%
He needs to rest for a few weeks first, after all rashad declined to fight him because it was too soon.
Machida will win anyway, nothing has happened to make me think evens is anything more than a paper champion.
by Confused on Mar 10, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rampage has no reason to take this fight. Why would he? I would give him much respect if he takes the fight, but if he waits, he can just fight the winner. Its like a tournament and he’s already in the finals.
by Stryker on Mar 10, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He should definately take the rest. 3 fights in 5 months is insane, let your body heal come back at 100% and be the best rampage you can be.
by Dragon on Mar 10, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only problem with Rampage waiting is that he doesn’t always perform at his best when he has a long lay off – he is not the easiest one to get into the gym. I thought Rampage wanted to keep the fights coming and stay as active as possible. The time off for Rampage may actually end up being negative – not only performance/training wise – but what happens if he passes up the fight. Rashad and Machida fight. The winner of the fight walks away with a broken hand and cracked ribs, which means that he is suspended for like 5 months. That means Rampage can’t get a title shot until the end of 09. In my opinion, if you are offered a title shot – YOU TAKE IT
by ViolentMike on Mar 10, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i pretty much agree 100% with that statement..
but if he didnt accept the fight i could understand as well..
it would be his 3rd fight in 5 months and also a fight against an opponent from the same camp as his last one..
with all his court~ and the fact that he is human and deserves relax time?? i would understand..
but on the same note~ like u said~ ‘if ur offered a title fight’’?? you take it!!
sidenote
i heard that rampage already denied the fight..
i hope its wrong~ but that is what i heard.
by stinky~fingers on Mar 10, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats the way i see it, you can’t blame him for turing it down but i don’t know if that would be the best choice.
by roy on Mar 10, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The main problem with him not taking the fight is that he won’t get to face Rashad as Machida is gonna take the belt then all that trash talk was for nothing!!
I can totally understand if he did wait though. He has had a pretty full schedule lately and travelling over the other side of the world and being away from family etc is tough too.
by Ca$z on Mar 10, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ViolentMike-I couldn’t agree more. There sre so many things that can affect when and who gets the title shot. There is no such thing as a sure thing. Take your shot when its offered.
by TapOutNow on Mar 10, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree with one point about Rashad being a paper champion he just knocked 2 of the most popular fighters of all time and a loss to Machida is not exactly proof of him being a paper champion although I think he beats him anyway.
by Robert(1) on Mar 10, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has to defend the title first, and he’s taking his time doing that.
by KS on Mar 10, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Taking a long time to do that? He just got the belt in Dec, whats that like 5 months? thats not long, look at BJ, hes taking his sweet ass time to defend his belt, and he never officially defended the Undisputed LW belt, since him and Sherk where both champs in some way
by N-Cryptic on Mar 10, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
a paper champion ?? the man is undefeated and basically hasnt been in real trouble in any fight … how can u call that a paper champion ?? Machida has 2 convincing wins other than that he hasnt shown me anything to make me think he is little more than a dancer out there 2 eek out decisions
by Jakob on Mar 11, 2009 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t wait! Either if its Rashad – Rampage or Rashad – Machida, it will be great!
by Kriss on Mar 10, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
True, 3 fights in 5 months is pretty rough; he might need time to recover and heal up. I’d say let Lyoto have his shot; and give Rampage time to heal up even though I’d rather see Rampage vs Rashad than Machida vs either one; but if it has to pan out that Machida ends up fighting both; then so be it.
by O damn he got caught on Mar 10, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good call OD…why would Rampage fight both when he’s guarenteed to fight the winner…waiting would be the best move on page’s part if you ask me
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like ViolentMike pointed out above, there’s really no right or wrong choice here for Rampage. There’s 2 sides to this coin. The risk is equal and when you flip that coin, no matter what side it lands on the positives & negatives are pretty much the same.
by Machine on Mar 10, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree. title shots are not easy to come by, Rampage has earned his, no reason for him to rush it. I want to see 2 top fighters, on top of their game fighting for a title…and I cant see how Rampage could possibly be in top form if he takes this fight so soon. I applaud him for taking on all comers with little break in between, but he needs a break. If Rampage takes this fight it will not be fair to him and Rashad will have an even bigger advantage than he already has after making his crony Jardine fight Quinton 1st.
anyone see Dana’s quote about how the UFC will start creating and releasing its own fighter rankings?
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dana’s very own “Employee of the Month” club.
by in2sauce on Mar 10, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont get it? employee of the month club? please explain
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
rashad did not make jardine fight first, fighters don’t pick who they fight, dana and joe do. they are the ones that asked jardine to fight rampage. yea its a coincidence that shad always gets left overs, but people always hate on him for that, and its clearly not his fault. and its not even like they had plans for this. jardine fought forrest ufc 66, and chuck ufc76. rashad fought chuck at 88, and griffin 92. its just rashad rose to the top, and had to fight top contenders, and it just so happened to be these guys
by ufcfanatic23 on Mar 10, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly! I posted the same thing earlier on this thread. Finally someone else who understands how things work!
by Machine on Mar 10, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah that might be true if Rashad didnt turn down the Page fight already. Thats what cleared the way for Jardine and Page. Bottom line Rashad has already ducked Ramoage
by lokie on Mar 10, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It almost sounds like Rashad is making excuses for his upcoming loss…
by Chief on Mar 10, 2009 9:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Everyone always brings this up. I’m not singling you out Chief, but man it’s ridiculuos. So basically, if you discuss your opponent or his style and your not trash talking, your making a pre excuse for losing?
It’s been slowly but surely happening but I think…yep, Yep I just lost faith in humanity.
by JaSwin420 on Mar 10, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see your point but I truly believe Rashad thinks he’s going to lose. Don’t know why just the way he talked at the fights the other night and now this. Who knows…
by Chief on Mar 10, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rashad also said it doesn’t matter who he fights, he is positive he will win.
by Diceman on Mar 10, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he was also positive Jardine was going to beat Rampage,so that does not matter
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was responding to Chiefs comment saying that it sounds to him like Rashad is making excuses for his upcoming loss.
by Diceman on Mar 10, 2009 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually think Machida would have a harder time with Rashad than Rampage. As much as I dislike Rashad and his cocky personality he is a very smart fighter…Rampage on the other hand…
by Heaton on Mar 10, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i agree i think Rashad will beat lyoto, but rampage would get picked apart and look like tito did when he fought machida
by Blazy J on Mar 10, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In what way do you think Rashad would defeat the Dragon? Just curious.
by Heaton on Mar 10, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
machida relies on speed to not be hit while standing straight up and down. machida hasnt faced a striker with thte same speed and power of rashad. he has been able to get away with not being hit too much because his opponents have been super slow, (tito, thiago silva, nakamura), predictable (sokuo), or smaller (penn). the closest test he has had to rashad is a green rich franklin a few years ago who is slower and doesnt hit as hard.
by COR on Mar 10, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What you fail to mention is he is still faster than Rashad,Rashad is not much faster than Tito we saw that when they were in the octagon together,Tito also looked like the better wrestler than Rashad,so I feel a hip toss coming Rashad’s way
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scott, I understand your perspective but I want to point out that Rashad’s hands picked up all that speed AFTER he fought Tito. Point being that to use the Rashad vs Tito fight to gauge how he’d perform against anyone currently would be inaccurate because he’s not the same fighter as he was back then.
by Machine on Mar 10, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would agree that appears that he has better handsspeed now ,but how well did it look against Forrest until he caught Forrest’s leg and nailed him,did it matter against Chuck anybody that threw an overhand right would have hit him.If you think about it for a minute I am sure he has gotten better,but his speed has not improved that much
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In what way do you think Rampage would get picked apart by Machida? Just curious
by SoCal on Mar 10, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rampage steadily walks forward when standing and isn’t the quickest thinker out there (Watch the Jardine fight- He had a hellava time with his weird style) he doesn’t do take downs either which would play out perfectly for Machida. Just me opinion…take it for what its worth.
by Heaton on Mar 10, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know, he took down Jardine twice(didn’t use his awesome GnP, but still scored points). Rampage used to be king of the slam. I don’t know, I think a lot of you guys are taking Page for granted. He used to mix it up quite well, and I’m thinking when he needs to he will. All his fights in the UFC he’s had the advantage in the standup. Plus we all know he loves knocking people out. He said he wants the belt back, and I think he’ll do whatever it takes to get it back.
by Diceman on Mar 10, 2009 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem with the matchup is how will Rampage close the gap,he is likes to throw alot of hooks and crosses,does not depend on his jab and I cannot remember him KO somebody with a straight punch,so I feel it will be hard for him to shoot for a takedown without it backfiring against him ,and he ends up on his back,which even he said he is not a BJJ guy,we all know Machida is probably the most elusive fighter in the business
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hendo couldn’t hold Page down, so I doubt Machida would be able to. I doubt Machida would be able to get him on his back in the first place. Anyways, have you ever seen Rampage submitted? I think he has like one submission loss. I think you’re right to a degree about Page having trouble closing the gap, but he also has very good defense and a rock-solid chin. I think that will allow him to close the gap. We’ve never seen Machida in trouble, and I’m interested to see how he responds.
by Diceman on Mar 10, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
was thinking the same thing. I sure hope that someone gets a hold of him and talks him into coming back. The guy knows mma, and has provided me and all of you with endless mma news before sites even posted it. I do understand his point of view. TO me it seems like all john wants to do is talk about mma, which is the only thing we should be doing on this site. It has to be frustrating when he has people taking shots at him personally on a daily basis. He fires back at people once or twice, but in the end he usually is the better man and abandons those stupid arguments and just lets people to continue talking trash about him.
I cant possibly see how this site is better off without john. Mania, shoot him an email, and get JOhn back on this site.
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha…good ole’ John…I bet dimes to dollars that he is reading this and might even be here under a different
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know man. He seemed pretty pissed. I have been on this site for a while, and I never really seen him back down for an argument. I think he was genuinely fed up. McArthur, you seem to have a good relationship with him. Why dont you give him a call and tell him to come back?
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going to ask some of you guys the same thing. I think Phil talks to him but not me…I’m too new to have anyone’s #…
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Check out the john appriciation club forming here!!
Who did he have a row with? Was it JV?
He’s alright in my books as he clearly loves his mma and hasn’t wronged me… but i can also see why he gets on peoples tits when he shouts people down and describes himself as a “beast” of mma knowledge.
Agreed tho, he does hit the site up with some big scoops.
by Nick J on Mar 10, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no it was JRE…I’m not blaming JRE as I thought it was kinda funny but just think John blew it out of preportion (sp)
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just dont see how this site could be better off without him. I dont think that guy will ever stop blogging about mma. He loves it! Its not hard for him to find another site to blog on, so in the end its our lost more than it is his.
When he says stupid stuff about how he is a beast or a monster I dont think he is referring to his mma knowledge. I think he means that in terms of debating a topic, and I have to admit that he is pretty damn good at it.
For me, he is one of the people who’s posts I always look for, so I guess that makes me a fan!
where is adam G with his list? we need to see who is on team John and who is on team JRE. put me down for team john
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dave are you John under a new screen name?? Heaping on a crap load of praise there..
by O damn he got caught on Mar 10, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mcarthur, which thread is the debate in, I wanna read .
by O damn he got caught on Mar 10, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
o damn~ it is in the fight salary thread~ but trust me its pretty lame~ and its not a debate..more like a sissy girl move on behalf of a fool named jre..
john bounced out of the arguement cause that jre goof was just pulling up old stuff and attacking john..pure sissy move~
jre said he has been holding it in for a while..sounds like some kind of gothic or something?? he probably has a vudoo doll of john he punches..
mcarther and dave~ dont worrie about john..i have been coming to this site loing enough to know john dont care about that stuff..
u guys will see some fool take shots at john like that a few times a year..it will fade away like the rest of his number one fans..
also~ we should not even be talking about this crap!! i cant believe i actually read that entire thread..that jre fool started a non~mma beef on a mma website..
im thinking jre is not the smartest peanut in the turd~ cause we like to debate mma around here..he does not?
thats why john stopped posting in that thread..he didnt leave for good.. just out of that dumb convo..
anyways~ lets keep this thread from turning out like yesterdays..redirect it now!
i hear that lyoto will be fighting and rampage already turned down the fight..
if true?? i dont blame him at all..
by stinky~fingers on Mar 10, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nm, I found the thread, only ever had one/two arguments w/ John; but all in all, he’s a good guy, with solid info; albeit a bit overzealous at times. Though he’s got to stop posting all these compliments about himself under a diff screen name lol.
by O damn he got caught on Mar 10, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes! I am the new john! lol. He is I and I am him! (sarcasm).
this is my thing. What separates this site from the other sites are its bloggers. No offense to mania, but all the news is pretty much the same from 1 site to the next. I have been on this site since the uFCmania days and I have frequented other sites. what seperates this site from the other ones, is the quality of its bloggers. I like to keep it mma related. what I saw yesterday was pathetic and I forgot I was on mmamania. I thought I was back at Sherdog for a second. Stuff like that should never happen on this site,
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahaha. o damn he got caught: you sure that you arent john, trying the reverse psychology angle to hide that its you?
even when he isnt around, he is felt. For the next week we will all be wondering if its him under a different name. I guess we will never really be free from him. John stop acting like a bitch and come back.
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think when john posts again[and he will] it will be under his own name..
honestly we should be talking about the rashad title fight with machida..
i think that rashad will have a decent chance at taking machida down for ground and pound..
rashad has not looked back to his wrestleing for a while and it might be the stratagy he needs..
his hands[as of late] have been giving him a whole new look..
i really like machida though and am a huge fan..
it really depends on what the odds for this fight will be..
im thinking the odds will be pretty close..
any thoughts??
by stinky~fingers on Mar 10, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t want to argue about Tito this or Tito that (cause I’m still a fan of his for some reason) but I don’t see how Rashad will take him down if Tito couldn’t.
Stink~I think the odds will be a lot closer than the fight will be. I see a tremendously boring 1st 2 maybe 3 rnds with Machida getting the victory in the 4th…I could also see this going to decision…the toughest part for me is deciding how Machida will win
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i knew someone was going to bring up tito..
see the thing with tito was he fell into machidas game..
he got all flustered and thats what machida wanted..
i think tito had the skills to win that fight but machida got in his big head..
tito didnt really get in his groove until late 3rd round~
but by then it was over..
rashad on the otherhand~ i dont ever recall seeing a fighter take him out of his zone for an enire fight..
rashad is a smart fighter with great skills..the same goes to machida~
soo maybe your right with the boring fight??
by stinky~fingers on Mar 10, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha…thats what I mean, if Shad and Machida both stick to their game plans it’ll turn into a staring contest in an arena filled with boos
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tito shoots in for take-downs from a mile away and got into a habit of always going for the double. He also never graduated to changing levels & using his strikes to set-up the take-down.
by Machine on Mar 10, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Machida will fluster Rashad like no one has ever been able to do. No matter how hard you study Machida, his opponents all look clueless when fighting him. Machine made great points. Tito and Rashads takedowns are like apples and oranges for the exact reason’s that Machine mentioned. On the flip side of that argument, machida Td defense has been improving at a drastic rate. The few times that Tito had closed the distance and got his hands on Machida, lyoto just bullied him off. I was very impressed. it reminded me of how Alves’s td defense improved and how he just shrugs people off of him. His td defense is going to be even better by the time he faces Rashad.
Call me crazy, but I think lyoto is going to put Rashad on his back. In a wrestling match Lyoto would never be able to take Rashad down. But because Rashad will be so worried about Machida’s strikes, I think Machida will surprise everyone, including Rashad and get the takedown. Remember, no 1 thought he would take tito down either.
Should be a good fight but I cant see Rashad beating Machida
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tito had Machida beaten in the clinch once he got him there in that third round.. he should have kept on doing dirty boxing ala Randy Couture instead of overcommitting to get the takedown as usual that can’t be good for his back! Machida is yet to fight a good striker in the UFC and did look tired in the 3d round against Tito! Rashad on the other hand got taken down by Bisping, Salmon and Tito not too impressive at all!
by RoB on Mar 10, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rob, and what did they do with those takedowns? Rashad has never suffered ground and pound and was up fairly quickly. Rashad may be the only fighter outside of Chuck that Tito took down and couldn’t do anything with it (although the Chuck takedown was very very short lived).
Rashad has a better setup to a takedown. He throws combination’s of punches before shooting. Tito is a dive shot type wrestler. Tito is strong enough in the first to pull in some takedowns but after that, he gets tired and won’t pull it in. I am not sure who wins this fight. I guarantee it will be exciting with a lot of transitions. I can see Machida trying a takedown so I hope this is the fight that happens. Two guys that are undefeated fighting for the belt doesn’t happen very often!
by halljam2 on Mar 10, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well i know that, but they still managed to take him down.. not that impresive takedown defense from Rashad, and when he did take Tito down he almost got guillotined!
by RoB on Mar 10, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At the end of the second yes. In the third he took Tito down virtually at will.
by halljam2 on Mar 11, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only weakness Lyoto has is that his english is still not up to par.. and the UFC has a shitty ranking system..which makes title shot given appear more like Pro Wrestling then it should be for MMA. Rashad would.. and will get victimized by Lyoto once the Octagon cage closes them in. The only thing Rashad has going for him.. is in the Wrestling department.. and he does have fast hands.. with powerful.. but let us not forget.. Lyoto does too.. + Lyoto is a prodotype of sorts of the future Striking Artist in Martial Arts.. with a Nog BJJ black Belt.. Lyoto’s other weakness maybe be he doesn’t talk as much smack as Rashad does.. The other weakness Lyoto has.. is that other UFC fighter’s don’t want to fight him.. lack of creditable opponents will keep the UFC gold off your waist.. Guys.. Lyoto today IMO.. would beat Rampage and Rashad.. Rashad would get his timing down.. unless he can find Bruce Lee to be his camp.
by PhilQNY on Mar 10, 2009 9:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Phil, Machida was on Inside MMA last week or the week before and his English is getting VERY good!
by ViolentMike on Mar 10, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you’re right phil. I could see rashad pulling it off though. But if I was betting money, I would take machida against evans or rampage.
by Dragon on Mar 10, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From a betting standpoint, I’ve put money on Machida his last 3 fights, and I will continue to bet on him until he goes on a losing streak. Even after a loss, my money would still be on him regardless of his opponent.
by ViolentMike on Mar 10, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I were a betting man, I would bet money on Machida against anyone, especially now. lyoto seems to be finding his comfort zone and that has to be a scary thought for his opponents. His comfort level seems to finally be matching his skills and i believe that we haven’t even seen how good he is capable of being. The dragon is headed right to the top of the fight game.
It doesnt matter if its Rampage or Rashad. Machida is going to be wearing that title soon.
if i had to pick a fighter with the best chance of beating machida, I would say Jackson, but even that is highly unlikely.
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rampage eh? How so? Just because of brute strength? Ill tell you I think that fight would be a longer than usual full 5 round unanimous decision victory by Lyoto meself just because he would have to be more cautious than normal. Rampage hits pretty hard. I just don’t think he is smart enough to defeat Lyoto. You saw how hard of a time he had with Jardine’s awkward style.
by Heaton on Mar 10, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not saying Quinton can beat him. I just think quinton would be his toughest match up. Who do you think has a better shot than Quinton? I dont think anyone will debate that Rampage/lyoto/Rashad are the cream of the crop at 205 lbs. I happen to think Machida is the best. I like Rashad, but still isnt proven enough for me to give him a good shot against Machida.
by DAVE on Mar 10, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i hear that rampage will not be fighting..
it should break later today~ early tomorrow..
if that is true? i feel that rashad has all the tools to be machida..
depending on the odds i get for this fight i could see myself putting some cash on rashad..
but to bet against machida might be a foolish thing to do..
so? in the meantime?? i will sit back and let my fellow mmanerdz debate..
that is why i love this site..
i get to read opinions and insight on my favorite sport
from alot of knowledgabe fans across the globe..
vm~ ur getting on more often these days~ not busy at work??
its good to see u on more~ as ur input is one of the strongest around this site..
howd ur bets go this weekend? win some? lose some?
i pretty much broke even..doomsday looked good till he got ko’d.
and i feel we both got robbed big time on the riley fight.
oh well~
by stinky~fingers on Mar 10, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve been thinking this over, and actually talked with Psyqo about this before; there’s only one man that could totally dominate any division. He’s a little old now, but probably still has what it takes. That man; is William Shatner; he has beaten Klingnons; green lizard people and more. And with his price line negotiation skills would be the highest paid fighter in the sport if signed on a contract. Truth…
by O damn he got caught on Mar 10, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stinky – since I got promoted at work a few months back, I really haven’t had as much free time to come to the site because I’m actually very, very buisy.
But somedays, I just have that “F’ it” attitude and don’t do much work at all. Its been a rough day, and since my buddy got fired on Friday, Mania is now my only outlet at work. But you are right, before that last promotion, I LITERALLY spent 6 hours of my 8 hour day on Mania! Usually when I come now, I only have time to post something pretty quickly.
As for my bets this weekend, I really didn’t have much action. I had a small parlay on Riley/Munoz = LOL. A straight up bet on Riley. And the bet I won was on Carwin at +140. That was it though, so I lost money on the event – mainly because I only had peanuts to play with (Kos…..)
I am going to be depositing again, but I am thinking about Bodog because their minimum bet isn’t $5, it is $1 – and I’d love to put together a bunch of $1 monster parlays every now and then – HOWEVEVER, I don’t think they offer parlays on MMA. WTF!!!! Does anyone else here know otherwise? Also, I can’t figure out how to parlay an NBA game with a College game – it should be simple.
My usual site is BetUs, but I deposited $25 on Bodog two Kentucky Derby’s ago when BetUs was having technical difficulties.
FYI TO EVERYONE: If you want to open a bodog account, let me know and I’ll refer you. If you are opening a BetUs account, be sure to click on the links on Mania so he gets paid!
by ViolentMike on Mar 10, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can definately parlay on Bodog for MMA (I do it all the time). And like you said, the $1 monster parlays are fun, rarely pay off but you can include up to 12 different fights from a variety of fights.
by Victory is Ours on Mar 10, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Victory – thanks for the info!!!!!
by ViolentMike on Mar 10, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah agree Phil. He looked as good as i can remember anyone looking in the cage against Thiago. I include Anderson Silva in that.
I mean with Silva you could possibly point to a weakness in the fact that, those who wanted to, in general have been able to take him to the mat.
Machida, no weakness as far as i can see. His ‘elusive’ karate style keeps him a fair distance so people can’t shoot for the takedown. He then circles when getting close to the cage, nips in and out for an attack and repeats.
He looked as near as it comes to unbeatable against Thiago and he will expose Rashad as the overrated smack talker he is.
by Nick J on Mar 10, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nick J! Thiago looked horrible in that fight, you would have to try hard to find someone that has sloppier standup than Thiago does.. he was overrated even if many including me thought he was the real deal.. Lyoto dominated and looked great, but that’s easy when your that much better! remember how many thought Liddell was going to beat Rampage b/c he had dominated lesser strikers in the UFC that couldn’t take him down
by RoB on Mar 10, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree…Lyoto has more weaknesses than that. His takedown defense is not the best but it is serviceable. That being said I don’t see Rashad having a problem taking him down as he’s taken down anyone he’s ever tried to take down. I know Lyoto has a BJJ black belt so taking him down is a double edged sword. I think Rashad has the better hand speed and power in his hands. Lyoto has better kicks and they probably have equal footwork in the cage. I think this is going to be a battle of counter punchers as both fighters have a great amount of patience to wait out their opponent to make a mistake. I think Rashad has a better chance standing up and letting Machida feel his power and if he rocks Machida at all…he has the speed and power to pounce on him and make him pay. Rashad has some serious GnP that is very underrated. We saw him finish Lambert and Forrest with it and it was devastating. Once he gets an opening on the ground he really starts raining down the bombs. I like Machida but I’m a hardcore Rashad fan…probably the only one on this site from the looks of the comments. I was actually preferring that Rashad meet up with Machida but after Page’s lackluster performance…I was rooting for Rashad vs Page. I know Rashad can take them both. We are going to see a long reign for Rashad…I know maybe people don’t believe that…but Rashad will still be champ at the end of the year.
by Buster Bluth on Mar 10, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“I like Machida but I’m a hardcore Rashad fan…probably the only one on this site from the looks of the comments.”
LOL well you should start reading more comments then. When it’s relevant I’m always vocal about being a huge Rashad fan since TUF. There’s a handful of other real fans here too but also a bunch that jumped on the bandwagon after he beat Forrest.
by Machine on Mar 10, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Rashad, and I think he’s better than Machida. In fact I think Rashad and Page are better than Machida. And if the rumors are true that Page is waiting I think he will still end up fighting Rashad because Rashad will beat Machida. Machida reminds me of the LHW BJ Penn…damn good fighter, but everyone thinks he’s wayyy better than he is.
by Diceman on Mar 10, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Rashad fan here. Wrestled with him at MSU so will always be. To be honest, I thought Chuck was going to KO him. He just finds a way to win in the cage. That was the first and last time I will ever predict that he will lose and possibly sleep!
by halljam2 on Mar 10, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree Phil. The ranking system that Dave mentioned earlier would certainly help the horrible selection and eliminate most of the controversy of who gets the title shot…but that would just put a hurt on Dana’s ability to market such a large payday as Lesnar has been for them so I wouldn’t hold my breath.
by Heaton on Mar 10, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I would love to see Lyoto vs. A. Silva! Title fight or not! I think Silva’s pin point accuracy would match up well with Lyoto’s elusiveness! Thoughts?
by Dana's a crossdresser on Mar 10, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they are close friends and training partners…not only has Silva said he wouldn’t fight Machida, he has also said he didn’t want a title shot at 205 cause that is what his friend Lyoto wanted
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. I donno who would win thought. Really kind of an interesting match up. I don’t I would prolly put my money on Silva just because that guy pulls crazy shit out of his hat when you think he is down. Truth be told I would rather watch Silva vs Rashad.
by Heaton on Mar 10, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow horrible spelling there. That was a though* and “I don’t know”. Have to excuse me, me brain seems to be leaking outta me head lately.
by Heaton on Mar 10, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mc, I knew they were friends, but didn’t know Silva said before. However, if the fight ever became in such high demand, and Dana raised the stakes high enough, Silva might take the fight because he wants to retire soon. And in a previous post by Mania, Silva’s manager said that he won’t be able to retire(financialy) by the time he wants to. So, I think there is a possibility! I will say though, as much as I would like to see this fight, that if they are truly that close, I hope that they don’t do it. In the end, I think Dana will find a way to manipulate the situation.
by Dana's a crossdresser on Mar 10, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t think of a bigger “super fight”
by McArthur on Mar 10, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Finding weakness is a two-way street, Rashad.
Machida is also looking at fight reels and can find openings.
Whoever fights Machida, it’s going to be a great fight to see. I’ve gotten tired of Rampages one sided approach so I want to see him KOed. Rashads speed/power is his key to victory.
by DubNub on Mar 10, 2009 9:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rampage vs Rashad, And Machida should fight the winner. I wanna see some black on black crime first.
by Il Nino on Mar 10, 2009 10:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rampage vs Rashad, Machida should fight the winner. I wanna se some black on black crime first.
by Il Nino on Mar 10, 2009 10:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
From what I remember of the Tito fight, Machida’s only major weakness so far has been cardio.
by DavidM on Mar 10, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
???? There was nothing wrong with his cardio in that fight.
He ‘lost’ about 5 seconds of it when Tito pulled guard and applied a slick triangle but other than that he dominated.
by Nick J on Mar 10, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes it was.. he was more tired than Tito and he was actually losing the third round in my mind, he scored the knee but Tito then got the triangle to get round back.. that was what happened even if the judges didn’t wanna see it
by RoB on Mar 10, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
get the round back* im busy plaing poker at the same time, haha
by RoB on Mar 10, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to see either match up but I think machida should get it first and off the subject can anybody tell me how to get a copy of pride fr sockwave 2002?
amor de rey
But war!
Rampage or machida.
by king criminales amor de rey on Mar 10, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rampage should definitely take the break. Rest up and fight the winner of Lyoto/Rashad sometime in the fall (Sept?).
Lyoto is absolutely scary right now and I would not want to fight him.
by Not The Face on Mar 10, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the saying is actually “a chink in his armor” but that’s not the only thing he’s wrong about. he’s gonna get dominated just like everyone else. machida’s gonna have this belt for a looong time.
by ActionJackson on Mar 10, 2009 11:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i agree – the only way machida will lose if he gets caught by something huge. so he’ll have to fight someone with knockout power AND machida will have to make a mistake
odds look good that machida will be holding it for a long time
by jerrolds on Mar 10, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Greg Jackson is the only guy that could put together a game plan to beat Machida, therefore Rashad stands a better chance of beating Lyoto than Rampage does. Rampage will find it hard to resist chasing him and ultimately get caught. The only way to fight an elusive striker is at his own game, it will make for a boring fight but that’s what he’ll need to do to beat him. Machida’s takedown defence is too good for ground and pound too.
by Oskarbravo on Mar 10, 2009 11:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Whats gonna happen when he gets caught? You think Lyoto will ko Rampage if he catches him?
I highly doubt it unless he can unleash some Wandy/Shogun type offense it wont happen , and since that offense isnt in his skill set the only way I see him beating rampage would be deciscioning him.
I think Rampage will catch Evans or Machida before they catch him.
But im bias and also know he isnt taking the fight so we will find out about later this year when he fights the winner.
by Dayzah on Mar 10, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, Greg Jackson is among the top trainers but he is no god. Watever the game plan he made, his fighters Jardine lost to Wandy and Rampage, Leonard Garcia lost to Mike Brown.
by Lights Out on Mar 10, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Machida deserves the shot right now, way more than Rampage. I love Rashad and think he and Machida should be the ones to fight, Rampage is a step behind both of these guys. That said I do want to see Rashad and Rampage fight just so we can put to rest that Rashad is just a better athlete and fighter than Rampage, but Lyoto is definitely next in line not Rampage.
by Spyder on Mar 10, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey Spyder how do you figure Machida deserves it more, is there a fighter machida has fought that is better than Rampage, jardine, Evan’s,Forrest hell is there a fighter Machida has fought better than Chuck or W.Silva? The answer is NO. But yet you think a fighter who has not faced a top five opponent deserves it more than a fighter that has faced the best since entering the UFC and way before. C’mon give your head a shake. All the guy’s I listed can beat the guy’s Machida has faced.
by Puck Head on Mar 10, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude you will see when he becomes Champion, he is undefeated for a reason. Lyoto would be champ already if Dana would have given him the shot. Its funny actually how many bad cards there have been lately but we still have not seen Lyoto get a shot.I dont believe he has anything left to prove. Your obviousy a Rampage fan that is still pissed about him getting owned by Forrest, and before you flame me for that comment, go back and listen to Rampage’s post fight comments in which he said Forrest whooped his ass. I think that you are funny and so is your opinion. As far as I am concerned for people out there that think Lyoto does not deserve a title shot are just uneducated fight fans that just want to see blood!!!!!
by the spyder on Mar 10, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL you know your wrong when? Rampage has nothing to prove he has beat the best in the world wich is more than Machida can say, I’m sorry for hurting your feelings but those are the facts. It doesn’t matter who we want to see it is who has beat the best that deserve a chance and the facts are Rampage has beat higher ranked opponents than Machida. It’s clear you can’t handle the facts because you have a thing for Machida. His record is good yes but his opponents have not been the best that’s a fact. We will see when he fights next. Sorry for stating the facts bud.
by Puck Head on Mar 10, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He beat Tito,and Tito really beat Rashad,how long do you think Machida should wait ,he is 14-0.By your accounts he is still behind Chuck,because Chuck has beat the best,right now Machida is the best fighter in lhw division ,and he will destroy Rashad.I personally believe that two things has kept him out of a title match,first, the odvious his style can be boring to some ,second they think once he gets his hands on the belt,he will hold onto for a very long time ,and that is not very marketable for UFC
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chuck can beat Tito anyday. Tito did not beat Rashad what dream world do you live. Get the facts straight before you post it might help your cause little man.
by Puck Head on Mar 10, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What,you really must be a retard,the only reason it was a draw ,was because they took a point away from Tito for grabbing the fence,go back and check the tapes you will notice Rashad also grabbed the fence and was not caught.Also you noticed I did not mention Chuck’s name on the list,but if they was to fight in the near future,the way Chuck has performed as of late,I think Tito might be able to beat him ,but I will not say Tito is better because Chuck has beat him twice
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL Tito is a big LHW Rashad had trouble with a man but has learned from and got a lot better since, and I can say Tito’s big head has not been in the game since, him and Dana were having a war of there own so when Machida had his chance against Tito it wasn’t the best Tito he could of fought, Tito who isn’t the smartest man by any stretch was very distrated with the Dana BS. Fact is this division is stacked and Machida is now in the top five there is no garantee with any fighter winning because of the talent in this division, Chuck is having problems beating guy’s with better stand up than his and tito still doesn’t have good enough stand up.
by Ringer on Mar 11, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah Tito ,who is better than Forrest,Jardine,Evan,W.Silva
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL that was funny LOL I almost sh^t myself best joke I heard to day Scott Tito is better LOL he got lucky against Forrest who I feel should of won but Forrest has got much better since, I’m sure someone with your MMA IQ was aware of that fact. Tito was just collecting a check when he fought Machida he was more focused on Dana than that fight there’s another fact I bet you didn’t know little man. If you need me to point out any other facts for you I’m glad to help any MMA rookie fan.
by Puck Head on Mar 10, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We all know about Machida’s last two wins, Tito & Thiago. Let’s check out his three wins before.
1) Win Rameau Thierry Sokoudjou Submission (Arm Triangle Choke) UFC 79 – Nemesis round 2 4:20
Rameau record 5-4
2) Win Kazuhero Nakamura Decision (Unanimous) UFC 76 – Knockout round 3 5:00
went the distance against 13-9 Kaz?
3) Win David Heath Decision (Unanimous) UFC 70 – Nations Collide round 3 5:00
Way to go Machida! There’s a reason your undefeated, four of your six UFC opponents suck.
by Beaver on Mar 10, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t get me wrong he’s a good fighter but I think you guy’s are jumping the gun on how good based on his mostly K1 undefeated record.
by Beaver on Mar 10, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey puckhead,for someone who almost sh#t himself,I noticed you did not mention Rashad.Watch who you call a little man or a rookie,I have been following MMA since I was 15 and I am now ,sad to say, 29 so you need to get off my nuts.Go act like you really know something to some other 15 year old,you might be able to pull it off!
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and to the point,when asked most MMA fighters will agree Lyoto Machida is the best in the lhw division,nobody wants to fight him because they can not figure out his style of fighting
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can I get a name list scott? What MMA fighters have said this?
by Diceman on Mar 10, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nobody wants to fight him, b/c he is bad business.. you are most likely getting set up to look horrible, with Machida running around you
by RoB on Mar 10, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
beaver soko was 4-1 when he lost to machida and it was when he had just knocked out lil nog and arona.just clearing that.
by NM on Mar 10, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know that, but he throws single shots to score.
by RoB on Mar 10, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you saying Rampage and Rashad are slow, Machida has not fought any fighter with their speed? and NM the fact soko was 4-1 does not change the fact he is 5-4. It shows he fought guy’s even worse than him in his firt five fights.
by Ringer on Mar 11, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rashad you suck, you shouldn’t even have the belt. You should just be lucky that you got to fight the previous champion who is a bum as much as you are. You lost to Tito Ortiz and you think you can beat Machida?
by xxBAxx816 on Mar 10, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
if Dana gives the shot to Machida in May, then we’re never going to be able to see Rampage/Evans for the title. That smack talk between Rampage and Evans at the end of the fight was legendary. The stage is already set for another primetime show with an intriging back story. First African American vs. African American for the light heavyweight title(that I know of) in the UFC, and Rampage just beat one of Rashad’s best friends, The $ for this PPV will be through the roof. If Machida gets the title shot in May, this fight will never happen (for the title at least). When Machida gets this belt, we’re going to see a run just like Fedor. Machida will hold that belt as long as he damn well pleases. People may disagree, but it’s fact. Machida is not beatable at 205. Simple solution, keep Rampage/Evans at UFC 100 (plenty of time for Rampage to regroup) and move Alves/St. Pierre to 98. I
by Josh H. on Mar 10, 2009 1:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
MACHIDA FOR THE TITLE!!!! Give it to him now. Rampage doesn’t deserve it just yet, meanwhile Machida deserved a title shot yesterday.
by tripleainto on Mar 10, 2009 1:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
rashad will lose once he gets tired he starts looking like shit. he rushed chuck in that fight cause the crowd was booing if that did not happen i think chuck would had won.
by danoblk on Mar 10, 2009 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I read Rashad Evans saying he could tell Rampage was making excuses not to fight in May…
C’mon Rashad… the only reason Rampage fought Jardine was because YOU needed some time off yourself…
by yoshi on Mar 10, 2009 1:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Again, Rashad does not make the fights, ridiculous comment.
by the spyder on Mar 10, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya I agree , He just fought why would he need too make a exscuse ? Too rest and heal up is not really a exscuse.
Just shows Rashad is a d-bag pretty much , when he needed time off too heal and rest after his Griffin fight , or spend time with his family nobody said he was dodging his next fight , not sure why he would say that about Rampage.
by Dayzah on Mar 10, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, that was some nonsense. It was supposed to be Evans and Rampage, but Evans declined. That was weird of him to call Rampage out like that. I’m not a huge fan of Rampage, but the dude needs some time off. I’d love to see Evans/Rampage, but in July rather than May.
by Josh H. on Mar 10, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so true, I read how after how after forest fight they asked rashad to fight rampage and he turned it down.
by danoblk on Mar 10, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
listen u either love machida or hate him but the fact is hes the mayweather of mma.hes never been caught clean let alone rocked(ortiz triangle aside!!)his footwork and movement is the best in mma period.and now hes getting a nasty streak its bad news for the lhw division.i cant honestly see page or rashad beating him.i love rampage but hes too one dimensional for lyoto and rashads fights against bisping and ortiz still stick in my mind.machida will decision both of them comfortably.
by scott on Mar 10, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
back than all shad did was wrestle, you can’t use that now that hes stood up with chuck and griffen and ko’d them both. i still see a really tough fight for rashad tho
WAR RASHAD
by ufcfanatic23 on Mar 10, 2009 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rampage will turn down the fight due to pre-existing injuries. Machida gets his shot, finish Rashad in the 3rd round and itll be Machida v Rampage at UFC 100.
by John on Mar 10, 2009 2:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rashad should just stfu and train and leave the interviews alone .. Hes been pretty quiet since getting the belt Dec 27th , he should stay that route cause everytime he opens his mouth he loses fans and gains more haters.
by Dayzah on Mar 10, 2009 2:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to take Lyoto over Rashad. I know they are both counter-strikers, but the difference lies in what they do in between counters. Lyoto’s kicks are waay better than Rashad’s, and that’s what he uses to bait people in when they try to counterstrike on him. Lyoto will be content to kick Rashad to a 5 round decision, if necessary, with the occasional stick-and-move single punch. When they do engage, Rashad may have the speed advantage, but Lyoto has excellent striking defense and will win the exchanges.
I don’t think that Rashad will be able to take Lyoto down either. Many people disregard Lyoto’s sumo background, but it plays a huge role in developing his balance and those sweet trip takedowns that he uses. If Rashad clinches for a takedown, I think he’ll get the Tito treatment. The only way that Rashad wins is by catching Lyoto with a big haymaker, which I think is unlikely.
by cmon on Mar 10, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Doesn’t matter who fights for the belt, once Machida gets his shot at the belt, he’s going to take it and never give it back. The only person I see that will have a chance at taking it from him is Shogun if he returns back to his “Pride” form and then even then I’m not sure. Machida fights too smart for the rest of the fights right now, someone won’t beat him until they adapt his style and become better at him at it.
WAR MACHIDA!
by thefutureholder on Mar 10, 2009 4:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
could be a while then cause Machida isnt gonna lose!
by thefutureholder on Mar 11, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you base your prediction by what? beating Tito and Silva? Can you share what your smoking with me bud?
by Ringer on Mar 11, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Went Machida throw his punches, the punch is coming from the center line and his shoulder is square (facing his opponent) and he’s whole body move forward at the same time with the punch and the elbow acts like an wedge, so went his opponent countering him, their hands/arms coming forward are been deflected by Machida’s elbow. and on top that Lyoto move in and out like snake, stay on the outside(out of reach), so really hard for his opponent to figure out his timing. I do WingTsun(WingChu) and the way Machida’s punches is very similar, chain-punch or straight punch coming from the centre line is much quicker reach your opponent than a boxing punch (swinging punches or over hand punch) it takes more time to travel. this is one of reason why Machida doesn’t get into a swinging/boxing exchange, there’s “no guarantee” the bigger/stronger person will always have the advantage in boxing. having said that, Machida do box but with smaller opponent like Nakamura.
by Tim on Mar 10, 2009 6:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Machida will be the first to hand Rashad a loss. Machida has YEARS of fight training in karate, sumo, jiu-jitsu, wrestling and muay thai. What does Rashad have: wrestling with some fast boxing and a little muay thai thrown in…but so does every run-of-the-mill MMA brawler. The Dragon has consistently made his opponents looks slow, sloppy and amateurish and has beaten UFC champion material in Franklin, Penn and Ortiz. Lyoto is very intelligent in approaching each opponent with a gameplan, and his skillset contains so many fighting tools that many fighters probably haven’t seen: Ortiz never saw those double switch-kicks coming, Thiago Silva never anticipated those foot-sweeps. Machida’s timing and distancing finesse have thrown off all his opponents and Rashad is no exception. Machida’s refined style is the next evolution of MMA and we’ll probably see a lot more “counter-fighter” wannabe’s. Lyoto simply has too many techniques for Rashad’s ability, and probably more tricks that we have yet to see.
by nate75 on Mar 10, 2009 10:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He hasn’t fought anyone with rashad’s speed nate7. It doesn’t matter how much you know, it how ell you use what you have, and I agree Machida looks good but I’m not sold that he’s champion material yet anyway.
by Ringer on Mar 11, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rashad is powerful… Lyoto is dangerous…
The Dragon’s breath will heat up 98…I trust this will be a good fight regardless of who wins…
by Funroe on Mar 21, 2009 4:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















