MMA Mania: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Holy War Week Brings out the Worst in Fans

Team St. Pierre formally responds to NSAC request filed by BJ Penn following UFC 94

Head Trainer Greg Jackson and George St. Pierre cornerman Phil Nurse have formally responded to the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) in defense of a letter sent to the NSAC by BJ Penn earlier this month to address greasing allegations in their welterweight title fight at UFC 94 on January 31.

The response, available here courtesy of the LATimes.com, is in defense of a formal request (not a complaint) sent to the NSAC by the legal team that represents lightweight champion BJ Penn designed to ensure that the sanctioning body engages "in a comprehensive investigation and review of the activities involving and relating to Georges St. Pierre prior to and during the bout."

St. Pierre’s cornermen during the fight applied Vaseline to his back and shoulders, which caught the eye of ringside officials when they noticed the petroleum jelly on the backside of the Canadian and sprung into action, wiping him down with towels after rounds two and three.

"Rush" hasn't given any excuses for the incident, saying it was just a minor mistake caused by the between-round frenzy and was part of a breathing technique. UFC President Dana White — who's been taking the issue very seriously — has since blamed "stupid" cornermen (Greg Jackson and Phil Nurse) for the infraction.

The Penn letter to the NSAC indicated that not only is greasing illegal, but it taints the reputation of the sport and jeopardizes the health and safety of those who participate in it.

Star-divide

Furthermore, it states the application of Vaseline put Penn at a serious disadvantage during the fight because as a Brazilian jiu-jitsu specialist, "The Prodigy" relies on his ability to apply techniques and strategies designed to immobilize or cause potential injury to his opponent.

With that ability neutralized, Penn’s attorney contends that his client was put in an environment that was both "life threatening" and "career ending."

Perhaps the most damaging part of the letter was the accusation that a member from Team Penn had asked the NSAC prior to the bout to pay special attention to St. Pierre because of the possibility of Team GSP engaging in activities that would intentionally make him more slippery.

Today's response from the St. Pierre camp vehemently denies those allegations and goes so far as to blame the entire "Grease Gate" charade on Penn's bruised ego following a fight in which he was clearly dominated.

Here's a snip:

"We believe strongly that we have done nothing to violate Nevada State Athletic Commission rules or to otherwise impugn the outcome of UFC 94, the integrity of the UFC or the sport and that the letter [of complaint by Penn] constitutes nothing more than Mr. Penn's desperate attempt to protect his reputation and commercial value after being totally dominated by a superior athlete."

Penn is expected to proceed with a formal complaint in the coming days and the NSAC will have to weigh both sides to determine what disciplinary action should be taken -- if any.

Sorry folks, this one isn't over. Not by a long shot.

0 recs  |  Comment 193 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This was complete ownage by the GSP camp.

John Danaher completely and systematically destroyed every single one of Penn’s claims/complaints with extraordinary detail.

by Hardcharger on Feb 26, 2009 12:04 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I like the 1st paragraph about effecting the outcome. Ugh…so bored of this.

by Amos on Feb 26, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is a serious issue in and out.. of MMA.. but this response completly shitted on Penn.

by PhilQNY on Feb 26, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

After having watched the GSP video on Penn’s site I think he has a reasonable claim. I’ve also always wondered why gsp spits water on himself before every fight, which would help make him slippery from the start.

I think BJ got owned and would get owned 10/10 times he fights GSP but that doesn’t give the green light for GSP’s actions… Maybe A-rod’s cousin (PW) and Greg Jackson are friends?

by Arnold on Feb 26, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I found the letters from Jackson, Nurse, Friend and Danaher much more convincing than the video made by a BJ Penn fan. If you have the time, it’s 17 pages, but it’s a good read.

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And Penn got completely sh1tted in the octagon too! Hopefully he gets his act together at 155…

by Syd[a.k.a."the Negation"] on Feb 26, 2009 5:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone who didn’t read the actual reply from Camp GSP is missing out. BJ’s argument got raped worse than his guard against st pierre. This also shows what kind of douchy idiot Dana is for claiming with absolute certainty that Phil was cheating.

by NameNotRequired on Feb 26, 2009 6:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It would be a big mistake if GSP wasn’t punished, something illegal happened…he should be punished. This is a perfect situation to make a big example.

by ja434650 on Feb 26, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What was ‘illegal’ is pretty debatable. I think GSP’s camp did a great job of discrediting the allegations being made by Team BJ. I don’t see any repercussions befalling GSP or anyone in his corner.

by GregC on Feb 27, 2009 12:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

its up to NSAC i cant see Dana puishing one of his stars

by Thebending on Feb 27, 2009 5:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually liked the idea to use some sort of alcohol agent to rub on the skin prior to the fight. I wonder how that would effects any oils from the mineral baths that seep into the pores.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it might work on the skin but imagine if it somehow got into your eye

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 2:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Very true. I guess it would have to be approved and some sort of possible rinse afterwards with water? Because after the fighters clinched up there could certainly be some contact.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess slippery skin is just part of the game, it’s pretty hard to regulate that.

by ja434650 on Feb 27, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For the love of God, BJ….YOU LOST! Deal with it. GSP said it perfectly – “BJ Penn likes to find excuses as to why he lost vs. looking at what HE could have done differently or better”. THe letter beats the crap out of Penn again.

GSP vs. Penn I: Winner – GSP.
GSP vs. Penn II: Winner – GSP.
Letter vs. Penn: Winner – Letter.

This fool is 0-3 when dealing with anything that even touches GSP.

by in2sauce on Feb 26, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent comments. BJ Penn comes across as a spoiled brat. Just one thing to add:
GSP vs. Penn III: Winner-GSP

by M. Barber on Feb 26, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You are correct sir!

by in2sauce on Feb 26, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Definitly sounds like John Danaher was behind the wording of GSP’s response.

by PhilQNY on Feb 26, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah it does. Danaher is certainly articulate.

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

These letters are written by lawyers. Danaher, Jackson, etc. speak and the lawyers write so it’s tight.

Jackson’s camp is too wise not to use the lawyer technique.

On the other hand, BJ uses some obvious propaganda video made by some guy, which doesn’t have any weight anywhere. Is gameplan after the fight is as lame as his gameplan for the fight.

by ftg314 on Feb 26, 2009 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Guys i know that the outcome wouldn’t have changed, but the fact that he applied the jelly to the back is the issue. maybe it could have been the difference, but prolly not. he did it and he must suffer the consequences. because if you have everybody bending the rules, there is going to be someone down the road that does something worse than this. if there is disciplinary action make it harsh as possible to discourage others from doing this or maybe something even worse. i was rooting for gsp by the way so don’t think i am a bj fan. i am an mma fan that doesn’t like this sport to be tarnished.

by Keith on Feb 26, 2009 12:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly, it has nothing to do with penn getting beat he lost no matter what, but gsp cheated period, even dana says they cheated he just blames the corner men and not gsp, i think they all new what was going on and cheating is cheating.

by roy on Feb 26, 2009 1:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You might be dumb enough to try to grease someone in front of millions, but I doubt the very intelligent camp of GSP would even think about it. Guys, pull your heads out of your asses, everyone who knows GSP says he is as honest as they come, he DIDN’T (and doesn’t need to) cheat plain and simple.

by Gord on Feb 26, 2009 6:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What people have to realize is if it wasn’t intentional (only a MORON would try to do that in front of millions), it is no different than low blows, eye pokes or any other thing that is AGAINST the rules. Accidents happen and it had nothing to do with the outcome. GSP was wiped, so he was LESS slippery than he normally would have been.

by Gord on Feb 26, 2009 6:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, the rule says you can’t apply EXCESSIVE amounts of Vaseline. Since the amount was nil or minute the rules weren’t broken: no cheating.

Look “EXCESSIVE” in the dictionary if you still don’t get it. It’s a word with a definition and meaning, which will in turn help you associate reality with concepts for the purpose of understanding events, situations or other concepts.

by ftg314 on Feb 26, 2009 10:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

GSP’s response is completely irrelevant. There is video footage of the infraction occuring. Even Dana noticed it.

BJ depends on his ground game in fight due to his ju jitsu. What GSP did is take away BJ’s complete arsenal. You can see BJ’s legs slipping down in guard all throughout the fight. GSP will get in trouble for it. Watch.

So many past fighters have complained about GSP being incredibly slippery that Penn’s team had to call upon the NSAC before the fight actually.

I think that is what will help the most.

GSP fans will complain, though, because their favorite fighter just got caught cheating red handed. All responses are moot, however.

by TimNO on Jun 27, 2009 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel sorry for Penn

by Don on Feb 26, 2009 12:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why??? just look at his life and how much money he makes and his family has. Tough to feel sorry for a guy like that, I feel angry because he is such a poor loser that cant accept defeat.

by the spyder on Feb 26, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So in light of all of the evidence that has been presented, this shouldn’t be investigated? If BJ Penns corner had been rubbing vaseline on his back and all of this evidence was presented, people would call for justice for cheating. Sure, GSP still dominated him, but BJ tried to cheat. Right?

When Chris Leben tested positive for steroids, people didn’t say “Who cares? It didn’t effect the outcome of the fight.” He got suspended for 9 months. There are plenty of fighters that are saying that they felt it. Why would an investigation be so inappropriate? Something needs to be done about this problem. It’s another form of cheating in the sport of MMA. It needs to be looked into and steps towards a solution need to be taken by the commission.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that this was an issue that needed to be addressed. That being said, I think that they are taking steps toward a solution. I think that not allowing cornermen to apply vasoline to the fighters in between rounds is a great solution to the problem.

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that steps have been taken but if I am not mistaken, they were made by Dana White. I am saying that the commission needs to take official action as well.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As far as regulations or repercussions? After reading the letter the Jackson camp sent to the NSAC, I would be very surprised if there are any sanctions imposed on GSP or the camp.

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 4:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe, maybe not. But I look at it this way. There was talk of GSP being greased prior to this fight. BJ’s camp told the commission to keep an eye out for it prior to their fight. Sherk said in a post fight interview that GSP felt greasy. Serras camp told BJ’s camp to be ready for it prior to the fight. All of this was said prior to the fight, then vaseline is put on GSP’s back. I don’t think it was coincidence. It was like when the Detroit Lions pitcher had been using pine tar on his hands to make his pitches better. He played it off as nothing for than some dirt that he needed to brush off. They are playing off this once instance as nothing more than an isolated mistake when there is plenty of evidence that says otherwise.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 5:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Detriot Lions pitcher? Maybe you can answer this question for me? Why would a football team nead a pitcher and the use of pine tar and where exactly would the pitcher play on a football field?

by JSP on Feb 26, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps Penn should grease his bald cabbage patch head and ram it right up Dana’s tarhole as this is typically where it is most of the time.

Florian will be the next 155 champ.

by deadgrassinyard on Feb 26, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

haha, that made my day, thanks

by Egads on Feb 26, 2009 9:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

JSP-hahaha whoops I meant Tigers. I think.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 9:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

RyanHobbs, there ISN’T plenty of evidence that Jacksons camp cheated. Did you even consider the FACT that GSP wasn’t even with Jackson for Sherk or Serra 1. Also BJ is full of shit and got caught in his lie about being prewarned by Kenny (not Serra). Kenny told BJ to post the email on the net and we HAVEN’T seen the NONEXISTING email. BJ is the shady one, not GSP. The guys claiming GSP was greasy (AFTER THE FACT) are nothing more than sore losers. Is it a coincident that all the guys that accused GSP just happen to be the biggest whining sniveling wretches, that got COMPLETELY owned and embarrassed? Grappling is a HUGE part of GSP’s game, so why would he want to be greasy? You must think vasoline is biased and only affects one fighters grip.

by Gord on Feb 27, 2009 2:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I never really thought about how GSP wasn’t with Jacksons camp in those prior fights. If that is the case, I would speculate that either GSP was the cheater himself or that several people lied. It’s hard to imagine that so many people would use the exact same excuse even prior to this situation occuring.

I know that he got caught in the lie about Kenny (those were mindgames based on their upcoming fight IMO) and yes it wasn’t Serra. It was Serras camp that had warned BJ’s camp about the issue. I read an article and I actually posted the link to it several threads back.

I think that if vasoline is on the fighters back and/or shoulders, then THAT fighter has the leverage with it. Especially when that fighter is so good at taking the fight to the ground. That helps deter submissions and it helps to prevent fighters from pulling guard.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 27, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice! I like how the term “totally dominated” was used in a formal letter.

I’d really like to see Florian take BJ out.

 i know its a stretch, but man would i be jumpin for joy… Sorta like when GSP ROCKED hughes’ world with that shin to the temple.

by Jammin on Feb 26, 2009 12:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

“Sorry folks, this one isn’t over. Not by a long shot.”

That is exactly right Jesse, and its unfortunate I agree but also tend to believe that this is the cause of Dana’s frustration as he realizes that it might leave a black mark over his “biggest fight in mixed martial arts history.”

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 12:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It shouldn’t be over. It’s not like BJ is trying to get this fight to be ruled a no contest. He is calling for an investigation and why shouldn’t he? No one else is. It’s ridiculous that this is being overlooked as a minor mistake when there is so much evidence that indicates otherwise. And even if it was just a mistake, wouldn’t an investigation help to prove that? Looking into this case may help give insight on what to do about preventing this problem in the future as well.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No one else is calling for an investigation? It’s being overlooked? Really? We’ve been beating this meat for weeks dude, it’s clearly not being overlooked. The UFC implemented new corner rules within a week and these documents are clearly evidence that an investigation/inquiry is under way and that it’s being dealt with (albeit slowly). So please stop acting like it’s some big GSP conspiracy and that you and BJ are screaming injustice from the mountain tops and nothing is being done.

by DSmith on Feb 26, 2009 4:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Plenty of bloggers on this site have complained about BJ. They keep callin him a sore loser and a cry baby anytime a story is brought up about steps that he is taking to make something happen about this. That is what I am referring to when I say it is overlooked as a minor mistake. I am speaking towards the people who refuse to believe that there was any cheating going on.

This isn’t about a GSP conspiracy. This is about evening out the playing field for every MMA fighter.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 5:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Tried to respond. Comment didn’t go through. Maybe later.

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you do know that the ufc doesn’t make the rules right. its the states commission that makes the rules. so before you begin to start mouthing off retarded made up facts make sure you brush up on the REAL facts. dana made suggestions not new rules.

by Keith on Feb 26, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You are absolutely right and a genius Keith. The UFC does not have rules or policies of their own at all. And Jesse Holland and SI are complete retards for using that exact verbiage several weeks ago when reporting UFC’s new RULE regarding corner men and cut men.

http://mmamania.com/2009/02/07/ufc-94-greasing-controversy-prompts-ufc-officials-to-consider-new-corner-rules/

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/mma/02/07/ufc.corner.rules/

by DSmith on Feb 26, 2009 8:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

DSmith OWNS Keith. BIZZAM!

by RyanHobbs on Feb 26, 2009 9:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

RyanHobbs, cornermen makes mistakes as the article below will depict this. I think this whole controversy is a tad over-kill. Baby-Jay really needs to man-up. I am still not sure how Dana White can be as successful as he is (luck I guess)…he has the IQ and judgement of a 3-yr old!

http://www.yardbarker.com/mma/articles/Before_Passing_Judgement_on_GSPTake_a_Look_at_This/529880

by NewMMAFan on Mar 3, 2009 11:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So suck on that Penn!!! I love it “being totally dominated by a superior athlete” now quite your bitchin and prepare for Florian.

by Dragon on Feb 26, 2009 12:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Petroleum jelly on one’s backside is never a good thing.

by PW on Feb 26, 2009 12:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

ZZZZZZZZZZZZING!!!

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Penn pwned once again.

by stevo on Feb 26, 2009 12:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I feel sorry for us, “sorry folks, this one isn’t over. Not by a long shot.” I wonder how long we will be hearing about this crap? I almost want them to rematch so we can put all of this to rest. I was pulling for Penn in this fight, but vas or not, he got owned!

by BOW on Feb 26, 2009 12:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree with them. Even if he did have a small amount of vasoline on his hands before he rubber GSP’s back it would have been minuscule. No more than fighters would get on thier bodied from rubbing against approved vasoline covered areas of the bodies like a face during the fight. And why is it ok to pour water over someone’s head between rounds? If that’s alright then a very small amount of grease wouldn’t make that much difference. Plus they were already sweaty at that point.

by Mattchupichu on Feb 26, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The fight should just be ruled a no contest and no rematch should be made until penn officially moves up in weight. he should have been given a shot at the title as he was clearly not the #1 contender at 170. The vaseline did give gsp an unfair advantage. If anyone looks up a fight that melvin guillard and roger huerta had years ago, you’ll see that the fight was initially a decision win for Guillard but was ruled a No Contest b/c his cornerman greased his shoulder in between rounds. This is the same scenario. Whether or not gsp dominated penn has no relevance on that, it two completely different things. GSP cheated whether it was accidental or not and the fight should be called a no contest. its the only right thing to do.

by bobby o'shea on Feb 26, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why would there be a no contest? The minuscule amount of Vaseline does not constitute an EXCESSIVE AMOUNT which would be necessary for NSAC to take any action.

And there will NEVER be a rematch for this fight because no one wants to see BJ get his ass handed to him again – which is exactly what would happen, even if they were fighting on the fricken beach in Hawaii, both wearing rash guards.

by stevo on Feb 26, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

bobby.. the scenario with Melvin and Roger was different.. because it was found that Melvin had some kind of substance placed on body before the fight.. which made the skin very slippery as he began to sweat… I think that fight and this fight are different in that regard.. I think this whole " Greasegate thing is very serious for the integerity of the sport.. but I don’t see any over ruling of the outcome of GSP vs Penn2.

by PhilQNY on Feb 26, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i disagree, in both cases the fighters were slippery. gsp was rubbed down in between rounds and it gave him an advantage. I think the fite should be ruled a no contest. gsp made a mistake and other than a fine, taking away a win from his record would be fair punishment.

by bobby o'shea on Feb 26, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bobby’s argument is very ineffective because he is equating 2 events in which the scenarios are different. Melvin Guillard intended to cheat and had a substance on his body before the fight(not fite, mind you). There is higher athletic commission presence at the UFC events than smaller shows, as well as everyone watching at home in high definition. The small amount that was accidentally applied to the other parts of Georges’ body was removed by the commission, therefore taking the cause out of Penn’s cause and effect argument.

by Malonish on Feb 26, 2009 4:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said.

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 5:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hey booby o’shea STFU, take a trip to Hilo and join all the other Penn nuthugger’s , he threw in the fucking towel, he quit like a bitch, he got pounded. go the fuck away!!!

by daz on Feb 26, 2009 2:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah bobby! you either have to be on GSP’s nuts or a BJ hater to talk in this forum.

and since i’m not a nut rider of any athlete nor do i hate on amazing fighters that are better and more accomplished than i or anyone talking on this website will ever be i can’t state an opinion and neither can you.

by AzCombat on Feb 26, 2009 5:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Would be simply outstanding to just move on from this incident. At this point the only thing left to see is rule changes/suspensions. Other than that I couldn’t care less about this.

by JTD on Feb 26, 2009 12:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Penn got ripped off, play and simple. Rematch is the only way to settle it. OBVIOUSLY.

by Insain on Feb 26, 2009 12:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You are a retard.
Thats all.

by tylerS on Feb 26, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you sir, are an idiot

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OBVIOUSLY

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Your insain man…

by PhilQNY on Feb 26, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You obviously need to finish grade 8 and learn how to spell.

A rematch would only be worth watching to see the extent of the beating cabbage patch would get again. That in itself would be worth watching….but that is about it.

by deadgrassinyard on Feb 26, 2009 8:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is a problem that needs to be addressed, but GSP beat him the 1st time.. and dominated him the 2nd time.. if these two fight again.. and if GSP is still the 170 Champ.. then Penn will need to fight at 170 against top 170 fighters.. to get that 3rd shot.. me personnally am as intrested in seeing..GSP/Penn 3.. as much as I’m intrested in Sylvia/AA 4.. but that is even better.. for jsut the " Tim.. Tell me how my PeePeePee tast "..comment alnoe.

by PhilQNY on Feb 26, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

haha i wouldn’t mind seeing sylvia/arlovski 4! lol i mean they still hate eachother it’d be exciting.

and that’s true if bj is ever gonna fight gsp again i think he should have to win a few fights at 170, sounds fair enough.

by AzCombat on Feb 26, 2009 5:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah it was Penn who made the officials freak out and run into the ring trying to towel the greasy Pierre off. It was BJ using breathing/greasing techniques. It’s all Penn’s fault that former opponents of Georges are lining up with the greasing story. They’re all just lying haters. Even the NSAC is just sore and know there was no grease. You can get away with anything if your a nice guy I guess. I personally wouldn’t know.

by TTB711 on Feb 26, 2009 12:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow, those letters were quite detailed, and from what I can see are more logical than Penn’s arguements.

by MM_Eh on Feb 26, 2009 12:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

And I’m not sure what critisizing Penn in a formal letter is supposed to achieve. To me that’s no better than Penn’s complaints. The formal letter should have addressed the corner’s actions and avoided name calling. But that’s just me speaking like I’m older than a 3rd grader.

by JTD on Feb 26, 2009 12:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Can you cite certain areas of this letter where anyone from GSP’s camp called Penn names?

Thanks in advance for proving you’re not completely making stuff up.

by Hardcharger on Feb 26, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well without even reading the letters, which I did skim, the quote above calls Penn desperate.

by JTD on Feb 26, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And how does that support your statement of name calling, in the least? I’ll help you out – it doesn’t.

Penn is in fact, desperate. That description, however, is not name calling, but rather an assessment of why this rebutall letter was needed in the first place.

LOL at you commenting on this topic in any detail when you admittedly didn’t read the letters.

by Hardcharger on Feb 26, 2009 1:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Incorrect. The above quote is addressing his actions. Nice try though.

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Am I incorrect or are my actions?

by JTD on Feb 26, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Your statement is incorrect. You clearly didn’t read the letters or you wouldn’t say they didn’t address the corner’s actions because that’s exactly what they did. But this is just me speaking like I’m older than a third grader and know what I’m talking about.

by GregC on Feb 26, 2009 4:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well I guess it’s my bad for not having the time to read the letters in detail during my lunch break. I see a quote calling Penn desperate (sorry, his actions, maybe there’s a difference) and thought it unnecessary. I’m the one whose desperate…..desperate to move past this very old topic getting even older and moving the discussion nowhere. Hopefully this lazy mistake on my part didn’t cause any lost sleep.

by JTD on Feb 26, 2009 9:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It wasn’t vaseline!
It was Maple Syrop
good ’ol canadian boy!

by Rusty Springs on Feb 26, 2009 12:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

LOL!!!!!!

by justagirl on Feb 26, 2009 7:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This whole thing is getting old. Now lets just see GSP move up in weight to get totally dominated by a superior fighter in Anderson.

by rydinlow on Feb 26, 2009 12:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I havent even really commented on it because every agrgument has been brought foward, wheather defending or ripping Penn.
But Im tired of hearing about it, but im even more tired have people responding. Im a huge BJ fan. I will say this had BJ quietly filed this request, and not continually complain, and post videos aboutit on his page people wouldnt be rippin him as bad. Bottom line he has the right to file that request as a profesional fighter, but if you do file a complaint show some class and keep quiet untill the NSAC makes there decicion. The sooner people stop posting 400 times about this on every story, the sooner it will go away

by LOKIE on Feb 26, 2009 12:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

How does ‘we do this breathing thing every time, so it proves we didn’t use vaseline’ make any sense? The videos show greasy hands all over Pierre’s body, period. I guess they’re argument will be, ‘but it wasn’t that much left on the hands’.

by TTB711 on Feb 26, 2009 12:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Clearly BJ and JD Penn need to just man up and face the fact that GSP is to big, too strong and too skilled to defeat. BJ, despite being the “Prodigy” is actually starting to look and act like a has-been fighter. Just wait and see when Florian wins a decision victory of Penn.

by dana blanco on Feb 26, 2009 12:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This one “isn’t over” because stupid government bodies take 1 year to do a 1 week job.

Seriously, have some hearings and present all the evidence which has been available for weeks and make a decision.

Once they make a decision there will be no more need to argue.

NSAC’s fault.

by Bennie Blanco from the Bronx on Feb 26, 2009 12:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Here in Flipland, the stupid government bodies take years for a 1-day job! Kurupt!

by Syd[a.k.a."the Negation"] on Feb 26, 2009 8:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The photo above this article makes all you GSP nuthuggers look like idiots. The GSP camp makes no valid points on why an actual jar of vaseline was inside the cage.

Stop sucking on fighter’s nuts and realize Jackson and the actions of his team ruined GSP’s victory and tainted what the UFC has spent years and millions trying to build.

by JarInHand on Feb 26, 2009 12:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Vaseline is allowed in the cage between rounds. you act as if it’s abnormal for it to be present. You must not be familiar with what goes on between rounds.

by Hardcharger on Feb 26, 2009 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Whatever Back Freckle

by JSizzle on Feb 26, 2009 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Superb response. Now, did you have any evidence to show that vaseline isn’t allowed in the octagon between rounds, or are you conceding that this notion is incorrect and obviously absurd?

by Hardcharger on Feb 26, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Should have added at the end: “furthermore, BJ Penn is a douchebag.”

by bostommmajunkie on Feb 26, 2009 12:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

hahahahahhahah i agree

by holyintellect on Feb 27, 2009 8:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A greased up/roided up GreasySP cheated, but ya’ll discount this?

Take GSP’s schlong out yo asses and his peanuts off yo double-chins.

sheesh

by salmonbum on Feb 26, 2009 1:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Here’s a complaint number for all you sore loser BJ fans 1-800-WAAAAAH.

by Gord on Feb 27, 2009 2:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said GSP, I already saw GSP step out of his “nice guy” image just towards BJ. I kinf of hope he goes a step further, and totally makes a statement like:“this was the easiest fight I have had to date, I’m not really sure why BJ or anyone thought that he is on my level, he is a pudgy big mouth that should not only doesn’t deserve to be in the same cage, but should not be allowed to even make eye contact with me”

by Riskreturngroup on Feb 26, 2009 1:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You forgot, “I was actually not imprezd by ’is performánze.”

by ARodOfIron on Feb 26, 2009 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Win or Lose, Greases St. Pierre is a CHEATER.

by daled on Feb 26, 2009 1:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Well, now that you say it that way, of course it’s fact.

by pud333 on Feb 26, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What are you Blow Jobs mom!!!! Did you not watch the fight.

by the spyder on Feb 26, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Say what you want but GSP and his corner CHEATED !!!!!!

by suck my nutz on Feb 26, 2009 1:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

changing your name to state the same thing over and over only makes you look like you need attention and acceptance

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was gonna point that out too. It’s funny when guys love their opinion so much, that they can’t even stand beside themselves, they have to have “other” opinions agree with them. Laughable.

by GodDamnMike on Feb 26, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, I’m lovin’ this letter. Total PWNage!

“It should be noted, however, that Mr. Penn has never controlled an opponent from guard position in a way that led to the finish of the match or even a decisive attack that turned the course of a match in his entire MMA career. It is extremely unlikely that he would begin by suddenly doing this against the current world champion in a higher weight category.” – Danaher

Whoaa!!!

by ARodOfIron on Feb 26, 2009 1:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Hearing them try to defend the outcome of the fight is ridiculous. The outcome isn’t in question. It’s the fact that he uses Grease.

Forget the outcome, forget that fact that it is GSP vs Penn, forget all the sh!t talking . . .

At the end of the day, I don’t want to watch MMA matches where one of the guy uses Grease on themselves other than their face whether it’s excessive or not.

Who cares if he would’ve won or not. The problem is, it’s now an x-factor and he loses the fact that he won without an edge. How about not rubbing grease on yourself and not putting yourself in a position where people question the outcome. I want that.

Bottom line … NO GREASE

by daled on Feb 26, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At the end of the day, I don’t want fights where a fighter cheats by repeatedly grabbing the fence or poking the other guy in the eye. But you don’t see GSP’s camp complaining about BJ’s cheating ways and his fence grabbing.

And FWIW, GSP didn’t grease himself

by Hardcharger on Feb 26, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well Put

by LOKIE on Feb 26, 2009 9:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh Sh^t son!!!!!! The man completely dismantled Penn’s argument. Gotta love it.

by DSmith on Feb 26, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I bet most of the people throwing out insults about GSP cheating didn’t even read the response from GSP’s camp.

It seems most of the people still insisting GSP cheated are not all that swift and easily fooled. GSP was fed GH for many years as a child. His mother was acually a Canadian( French Canadian) Bigfoot aswell so he has always had a great advantage.

by JonathanB on Feb 26, 2009 1:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

CHEATING IS CHEATING IDK Y PPL ARE DUMDASS ABOUT THIS. IF BROCK WOULD HAD LUB UP AGAINST RANDY YOU PPL WOULD BE IN A UPROAR BUT SINCE THIS IS GSP ITS OK THATS BULLSHIT HE CHEATED BOTTOM LINE DEAL WITH IT.

by justincredabel on Feb 26, 2009 1:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Here comes Kenny!

Here come Thiago!

Get over it BJ,

ps. I burnt your stoopid aloha bro t-shirt cause how could I be bros with a sissy

by DaveyJones on Feb 26, 2009 1:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

so sick of hearing this whiney little bitch complain. have lost all respect for bj.

by kronk on Feb 26, 2009 1:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This is Gsp’s camp bringing this up again, how is this story BJ’s fault. Obviously GSP hasnt gotten over it either. if ones a whiney Bitch so is the other one. If you dismantle someone who gives a flying F*** what people think. I would say about 85% of the MMA fans are on GSP’s side so why this?

by LOKIE on Feb 26, 2009 9:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It was requested by the NSAC.

by Shadyone33 on Feb 27, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i dont care if its GSPs rebuttle… still penns fault on the end lol

by holyintellect on Feb 27, 2009 8:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If you watch the fight, you can clearly see when Penn pulls rubber guard in the second, GSP’s skin wrinkles…How is this possible if his back was greasy? Answer, it’s not.

by MM_Eh on Feb 26, 2009 1:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

new evidence…wrinkly skin…nice work MM_Eh!!!! ;)

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

totally dominated by a superior athlete
 totally dominated by a superior athlete
 totally dominated by a superior athlete
 totally dominated by a superior athlete

 Enough said.

by Lester the Pimp on Feb 26, 2009 1:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

There were no complaints from BJ Penn or his corner during the fight end of story, he is just trying to save face after the fact. GSP should of complained in their letter about the negative impact BJ Penn having a mangina has on the UFC.

by Puck Head on Feb 26, 2009 1:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If the Penn’s knew about this before the fight, why didn’t the Penn’s do something about it before the fight? I wonder when JD is gonna give up on defending his loser brother and turn around and say “deal with it yourself BJ!, I can’t stand behind your excuses any longer.”

If I was a friend or relative of BJ, I would say “you’re on your own this time. Enough is enough!”

by GodDamnMike on Feb 26, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

GSP the Cheat!!!

by Gino on Feb 26, 2009 2:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Fuck BJ! you lost. and fuck everyone that thinks GSP is a cheater!

by gumbo on Feb 26, 2009 2:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow is GSP your boy friend or something. Im sure he feel better now that his B***H has defended him

by LOKIE on Feb 26, 2009 9:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Strong words, changes nothing. The grease was applied, intentionally or not, and the fight will forever be tainted. Whether it made a difference or not is impossible to know for sure, nor does it matter.

by Greasy Slimy Punk on Feb 26, 2009 2:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Forever the records will show a GSP win and a BJ loss. 95% of MMA fan’s agree GSP kicked his ass and the grease had no factor and 95% of fans know the same thing would happen if they fought again, hell 98% of the UFC know’s this. The other five percent of you can take your BJ Penn action figures vasoline them up and stick them were the sun don’t shine. Bj it’s time you stopped acting like a spoiled little brat and became a man. Forever BJ Penn will be tainted with a mangina!

by Puck Head on Feb 26, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOl 95 of fan’s and fighters know the grease had no factor in the fight. GSP will forever be known as the winner and BJ will forever be known for having a mangina. The simple fact BJ did not complain during the actual fight say’s it all. CRY BJ!!!

by Puck Head on Feb 26, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

95 = 95%

by Puck Head on Feb 26, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Where did you get those numbers? Making up figures actually makes everything you say less credible than more credible. And “says” is not spelled with an apostrophe.

by Boom Goes the Dynamite! on Feb 26, 2009 3:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Boom I didn’t know you had a mangina.

by Puck Head on Feb 26, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I got the numbers by my observation of fan’s comments on post from many sites and fighters replies from interviews please note numbers given are not exact. Thanks for correcting my grammar Boom Goes the Dynamite!, when I become as intelligent as you I’ll change my name too ‘Choo-Choo Goes the Train!’

by Puck Head on Feb 26, 2009 4:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL!! When i get’s intelligent I’m going to call myself Spank Spank Goes the Monkey and I’ll be more credible? Spelling has F all for credibility on a MMA form. Your knowlege of MMA is what you need to bring Boom. I know it’s hard to defend BJ these day’s I say’s.

by Beaver on Feb 26, 2009 7:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL!! My name when I’m credible will be Span Spank Goes the Monkey. You know the 5% of BJ supporters regarding this grease crap are really start to sulk now, they are attacking peaples spelling?! Sad very Sad. CRY BJ!!!

by Beaver on Feb 26, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When I’m more credible I’m going to call myself Whaa Whaa Goes the BJ! I say’s LOL.

by Beaver on Feb 26, 2009 7:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ya, and is mangina even a word? you cant go making up words, thats just wrong.

by Egads on Feb 26, 2009 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey Egads check it out you learn something new everyday after. Check it out then picture PJ Penn LOL.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Mangina

by Beaver on Feb 27, 2009 12:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Mangina

Check it out Egads! Now picture BJ Penn…LOL!

by Beaver on Feb 27, 2009 12:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

After your read picture BJ Penn as the poster boy LOL!
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Mangina

by Beaver on Feb 27, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Didn’t think the first one went through. This site is awsome! Boom helped puck out with his grammar and I informed you about BJ Penn’s actual sex LOL!

by Beaver on Feb 27, 2009 12:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not thatimppressed with the response. Jackson and Nurse essentailly admit that they violated the rules they just say it was unintentional. Their whole argumenet is “It wasn’t very much vaseline and it was purely unintentional. If it was intentional then we would have to be really crafty dirty bastards.” Personally, I’d be pretty happy if I never saw Phil Nurse My Dong in the octogan again.

by naturalist on Feb 26, 2009 2:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Actually, you are incorrect. The state the written rule, cite the Rule by number, and elaborate how what transpired isn’t prohibited by the rules.

And yes, I’m sure you don’t want to see Nurse in GSP’s corner, or the rest of his cornermen, or GSP himself, as he bludgeoned your hero and made him quit.

by Hardcharger on Feb 26, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It appears the ones quickly calling “cheater”, don’t even have a CLUE as to what the rules even are. The rules don’t say anything about a tiny bit of vas on the body, it says “EXCESSIVE”. If Nurse would have gave his hands a quick half assed wipe(like every other cornerman does)then there wouldn’t be a problem. Wake up people and use some LOGIC, the tiny dab on the back of Nurses hand wasn’t enough to lube up your dick, let alone the even tinier amount left after he applied it to GSP face. Logically far more vas would have been transfered to BOTH guys just from the fight it self. They wiped GSP,so get over it. BJ would have taken the exact same beating minus the tiny amount of residual vas from Nurses hands.

by Gord on Feb 26, 2009 7:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really? I was very impressed with the responses, especially the last one. I thought they did a good job at presenting their case.

Whether you’re a GSP fan or not, I think it’s hilarious reading…. Just my humble opinion.

by justagirl on Feb 26, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

nooooooo…I can’t access the letter. Anyone have it saved?

by jarutski on Feb 26, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

LOL! this is too funny because if Penn ever gets the rematch then this time GSP will KO him out! :-) I cant wait

by ramon on Feb 26, 2009 2:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Greasy.
The whole world knows it.
Not having the stones to admit it doesn’t make you look any better.

by KS on Feb 26, 2009 2:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I know GSP would still have won but i think maybe they may look at gregory jackson’s team being in the corners. I seem to remember kenny florian hinting that huerta was ‘slippery’ after their fight if im not mistaken he trained for that fight with greg jackson for a bit at least leading up to the fight

by Morgan on Feb 26, 2009 2:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

By the time this is over, Bj will look dumber than he does already and reputation will damaged beyond repair by his own doing. They will not fight again becasue BJ wont let it happen. Hopefully the courts rule there needs to be a re-match cause I would love to see BJ get dismantled again. I also find it frustrating that one guy thinks he is so good that the only way he can be beaten like a dog is if the other guy cheated and by a godam Canadian to boot EH!!!! get over yourself BJ!!!!!

by the spyder on Feb 26, 2009 3:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think the people basing BJ are missing the point. Who cares about how dumb BJ looks. The point is to get people to stop Greasing.

BJ was not the one running to the corner telling Nurse to stop rubbing his back and shoulders with Vaseline? It was the NSAC that had a problem with it. Are you saying the NSAC shouldn’t have jumped in to stop it?

Are you calling Liddel and Mir dumb for seeing it and saying something about it?

Are you calling Dana White dumb for wanting to run a legit organization and stop corner men from using grease on their bodies?

This has nothing to do with liking BJ or not.

by daled on Feb 26, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

By reading most of the posts on here its obvious either one you didn’t read the entire letter or two your dumb if you think gsp is a cheater or penns camp has any merit to there claims. Both the grease gate video and penns lawyers letter to NSAC are ridiculous. John Danahers point of view in my eyes is very convincing as he’s a grappling expert himself, bottom line Penns arguments like his performance at UFC 94 are pathetic and weak. Penn is a great fighter who fought a guy who completely took his strengths away from him and made him look like shit. For anyone who really cares about looking at this issue objectively read the entire letter from the jackson camp, I’m glad I took the time to read it all.

by nathan on Feb 26, 2009 3:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

BIG NEWS=COUTURE AGREES TO FIGHT BIG NOG AT UFC 101 WHICH TAKES OUT THE POSSIBILTY OF CROCOP COUTURE UFC 99

by NM on Feb 26, 2009 3:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

nice NM!! Where’d you read that?

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 3:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

GSP is tainted he fought BJ Penn who has a Mangina!!

by Beaver on Feb 28, 2009 3:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The IQ levels on this page are pretty obvious. To come to any kind of verdict on something you have to listen to BOTH sides of the story(reading penns lawyers complaint and request for an investigation to the NSCA, AND read gsp’s camp’s response to the letter and accusations), and try to be as impartial as possible.

 I have to agree with Hardcharger.

   "This was complete ownage by the GSP camp.

John Danaher completely and systematically destroyed every single one of Penn’s claims/complaints with extraordinary detail."

by nathan on Feb 26, 2009 3:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

nathan, my iquu is smrt, hehe. Very good point though.

by GodDamnMike on Feb 26, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LMAO at “smrt”!!! Good ole Homer!!

by McArthur on Feb 26, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You BJ fans honestly think you have a case after these letters?
I read the entire thing, but John Danaher’s part pretty much
destroyed ANY and ALL arguments Penn’s camp and its fans have.

The NSAC will close the book on this faster than you can say “BJ the Bitch.” Yes, they will change some cornerman rules (as they already have), but that’s it. There will be NO disciplinary action whatsoever.

All you BJ fans might as well start rooting for another fighter because BJ has lost all credibility. He will forever be known as a poor loser.

by MMA Fanatic on Feb 26, 2009 4:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The NSAC are the ones that opened the book to begin with.

The NSAC started Grease Gate by jumping in the ring and catching GSP greasing during the fight.

If anyone should be called a winey bitch, it should be the NSAC b/c they are the ones saying GSP was greased.

by daled on Feb 27, 2009 12:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone is being a fanboy about this issue. It’s really unimportant who has their ego broken or who is being a dick or who isn’t. Yes GSP won, and regardless of the grease, he would have won. BJ was not as prepared as he and his camp thought he was. But these are non-issues.

The fact remains that unintentional Vaseline was applied to GSP’s back and shoulders. There is even a clear moment in the videos that he applies it to his neck and chest. This happened, and it was documented on video.

The complaint may have been filed as a result of a bruised ego, but I do thing good things will come out of this whole issue. Vaseline will now, hopefully, be applied by only skilled cutmen and not the cornermen. I think this will be great for the sport as a whole.

Everyone can complain left and right about the skills of GSP or BJ, but really that’s not what it’s about. Let the case be reviewed and let a new rule for the NSAC be instituted.

Then we never have to worry about this again, right? Then when GSP dominates BJ for the third time, we can all just enjoy the fight. (and I’m a BJ fan, yes he’s insane, but let’s face it, he is a great fighter, but the wrestling of GSP was just too much for him in that weight division) And even for the next fight, if it happens, i’ll still root for BJ. But for once let’s just ignore the names and faces of the fighters involved and just concentrate on the complaints and outcomes.

Worst case scenario, the UFC becomes a more respected fighting promotion, right?
So please just stop with the fanboy-isms for this issue. It’s not for us to decide who was right or wrong, but just hope that the sport becomes greater as a result.

by 12onin on Feb 26, 2009 4:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree with most of your comments 12onin but there really is no way to completely avoid the vas migrating to the body issue as it will always be a factor as long as they grease up fighters faces. I personally don’t know gsp or penn, and in there own ways seem likeable, and annoying at the same time. Personally I think gsp really puts on an act for the camera and isn’t so squeaky clean behind the scenes and penn says what ever is on his mind.

  I really feel sorry for penn, as he took a severe beating and I can’t even imagaine how embarrassing that must be after everything he said. I can see why his camp filed the complaint as phil nurse did apply the vas to gsp’s body, and to save face. I personally feel penn knew the vas had nothing to do with the loss but his bruised ego let the complaint go forward. I really believe nurse didn’t intentionally do anything wrong, and it didn’t effect the outcome of the fight.
Penn is a great light weight champion, and gsp is a great welter weight champion, I’m curious to see who will have there belts come 2010 only time will tell.

by nathan on Feb 26, 2009 5:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

“‘Rush’ hasn’t given any excuses for the incident, saying it was just a minor mistake caused by the between-round frenzy and was part of a breathing technique”

Thats an excuse. Kind of biased reporting there. Are those the same not excuses he has for losing his two fights? I like GSP and know he is worlds better than BJ so all of u who are reading this and are getting ready to call me a hater or BJ hugger can stop now. There is a lot of biased that goes toward GSP, and he always has the benefit of the doubt. I’m glad to see the guy getting to be innocent untill proven guilty, but don’t lie to me and say he doesn’t have an excuse, even if ends up being true it is stil his excuse for what happened.

by trbtrouble on Feb 26, 2009 6:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

DUH, things that end up being true are REASONS and there is NOTHING wrong with giving reasons. How eles do we explain things,LOL.

by Gord on Feb 26, 2009 6:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

“REASONS and there is NOTHING wrong with giving reasons”

I know my point is right now, nothing has been proved, all we have is what we saw. So right now anything he offers up other .than just saying he cheated would be an excuse. So right now he has offered an excuse for what he did. So I don’t know why they try to tell us oh he has no excuses for what happened, they are just trying to word it to benefit GSP, which is biased

by trbtrouble on Feb 26, 2009 8:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Split hairs much? The difference between and explanation and an excuse is relative to your own interpretation.

If your credibility comes into question publicly you are going to offer an explanation are you not? BJ Penn’s claims are very damaging bordering on almost career threatening due to the amount of respect given to BJ Penn within the sport. One would hope BJ has the sport’s betterment in mind by going this route as opposed to using this to excuse a devastating loss and re-direct the focus.

GSP has publicly conducted himself well publicly by all accounts from my perspective. Bias is where usually found where you look for it.

by ArmChairMMA on Feb 26, 2009 7:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The fact is BJ is the one making up excuses and it’s not only GSP fan’s attacking BJ Penns character. If BJ would of complained during rounds he would have more credibility for his statement. If BJ was informed before the fight and never said anything during the fight he was looking for an excuse. Anyone with a half a brain can see this is BS, just a spoiled brat trying to save face and for that he deserves all the criticism he is getting.

by Beaver on Feb 26, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nahabedian says he did rub his back and pushed down on his shoulders but did not put grease on him. Is it that hard to believe that he did not have grease on his hands, I dont think so, he also states that the small amount is put on the back of his hand for application so unless he was rubbing GSP with the back of his hand I cant see how the grease got there. Simple it did not get there, this is just a load of crap. I do like how they stated that even GSP mentioned to his corner how slippery BJ was at one point during the fight. Its a rich bitch trying to disccredit one of the best fighters/athletes on the planet. BJ is not an athlete, GSP is plain and simple. He got beat by a better fighter and better athlete. He even went as far to say that he thinks GSP takes steroids because of how he looks. NEWS FLASH BJ, THATS WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE WHEN YOU TRAIN HARD, SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. ALWAYS PUDGY AND OUT OF SHAPE IS NOT HOW YOU BEAT UP SEVERE ATHLETES LIKE GSP!!!!!

by the spyder on Feb 26, 2009 7:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I hate this picture as well, just because you can see the VAS in buddies right hand does not mean he is putting it on his back. I read the full response from GSP’s guys and I just dont see how BJ even has a leg to stand on at this point. This is a joke and BJ should be thrown out of the UFC for making such a mockery out of it everytime something doesnt go his way.

by the spyder on Feb 26, 2009 7:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

We will all see what the NVSAC thinks here pretty soon and it will be long suspensions for GSP and corner. Terrible cheaters is what they are, the Wierd thing is they DID NOT HAVE TO CHEAT. I think when fighters are as skilled as these two, SIZE matters and GSP looked 40 lbs bigger. Im not sure what GSP cuts but he looked 200-205 by fight time. His physique is amazing and his legs are tree trunks. Minimum 1 year suspension for GSP and corner.

by slipperygspisacheatingprick on Feb 26, 2009 8:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Hey hardcharger, how you feelin? I do like GSP and have for several years(much more than Penn) However, there is accepted protocol in dealing with Vaseline. Jackson and Nurse violated that protocol in way that is obvious to both the pres of the UFC and pres of the NSAC. It doesn’t make GSP a cheater but some remedy and diciplin is in order.

by naturalist on Feb 26, 2009 9:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Fact is, vaseline or any other lub agent on fighter A, will automatically transfer on fighter B when both of them make contact, therefore, neither fighters will gain advantage. As mentioned in the 17 page letter, vaseline does not discreminate, both fighters become slippery after contact and transfer of lub. In most case, even vaseline applyied on the face of fighter A will end up on fighter B’s torso after a take down, and then transfer on fighter A’s torso as well when he tries to pass guard.

A last comment to those who give credibility to Hughe and Serra’s comment on GSP. How in the hell could both of the Matt’s complain about GSP being slippery during their fights??? C’mon, Matt Hughe won the first fight by arm bar, but was TKO’d in the two other fights, with very little body contact throughout, and similarly, Serra won the first one by TKO, but was completely overclassed in the rematch were there was again, very little body contact. One word comes to mind – jealousy, same as cry Baby Penn.

by MMArco on Feb 26, 2009 9:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Page 15 is the best page.

“It should be noted, however, that Mr. Penn has never controlled an opponent from guard position in a way that led to the finish of the match or even a decisive attack that turned the course of a match IN HIS ENTIRE MMA CAREER.”

by ftg314 on Feb 26, 2009 9:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Really? We’re still talking about this stupid shit… Who Cares?

by BK on Feb 26, 2009 9:46 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

LMAO!!!! slipperygspisacheatingprick something tells me your not brightest bulb out there……enough said, halarious.

by nathan on Feb 26, 2009 10:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

One thing I don’t understand is the comments about it being a miniscule amount of vaseline and it did not affect the outcome of the fight. To my understanding it is against the rules to apply vaseline to any part of the body other than the face in mma, intentional or unintentional fact is that vaseline got applied to other parts of gsp’s body other than his face. Karo Parisyan got suspended for taking painkillers. Painkillers aren’t performance enhancing but they are against the rules, chris leben used steroids and got suspended, sean sherk passed a lie detector test saying that he had no idea that he had taken any steroids but had steroids in his system, he got suspended, why I ask? why? because it is against the rules, people please take note. There is no doubt in most people’s minds that gsp would have won regardless of the vaseline.
IMO this fight should be ruled a no contest, a fine and written warning to gsp’s cornerman Phil Nurse and if it happens again he should be removed from the cage permanently, the NSAC needs to make an example of this situation and let it serve as a precident and warning.

by Ultimate Fighter on Feb 26, 2009 10:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

So you’re basically saying in MOST if not all fights, when vaseline gets distributed on both fighters body’s from their faces – they ALL should be ruled no contests.

The “miniscule” amount of vaseline that Nurse applied to GSP’s back is no different than the amount that ends up on each fighter from rubbing together.

BJ is the ONLY fighter to ever file a complaint this retarded because he can’t and probably will never accept the fact that he lost decisively. He knows vaseline played no factor whatsoever.

by MMA Fanatic on Feb 26, 2009 11:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ultimate this Vasoline crap and steroids are not comparable,it’s like saying a guy that murder’s someone should get the same punishment as a guy who smokes pot? Sorry but your example was horrible and makes no sense.

by Beaver on Feb 27, 2009 12:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s a little homework assinement for you to help you understand. Take a little dab of vas and then smear it on your face, then with the tiny bit left on your hand, wipe it on your dick, then take a towel and wipe it off, then try to beat off and then tell me that a MINISCULE amount could have an effect on the fight what so ever,lol. Where talking about sweaty (greasy, from face to body transfer)fighters to begin with. A touch more vas (that was wiped off)didn’t do jack shit. If it was a sigificant amount of vas, then yes it would have made both fighters more slippery,but it was much less than SEVERAL corners have overly applied to their fighters faces, which ends up all over the fighters.

by Gord on Feb 27, 2009 3:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i didn’t realize the officials had to wipe him down after the second and third rounds. that is what it says in the story above, right?

by Buttcrack Obama bin Laden on Feb 26, 2009 10:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ultimate fighter why the hell should it be ruled a no content when according the actual NSAC rules(if you actually read the 17 page response from jacksons camp)they literally didn’t break any rules. Sean sherk was tested positive for steriods and was fined,suspended and lost his belt but his win wasn’t ruled a no contest. NOTHING will or should be done to gsp if you actually knew what you were talking about you would realize this.

by nathan on Feb 26, 2009 10:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Come on guys. You are all stupid!

I was told in a text last month that GSP’s mother is actually a French-Canadian Bigfoot. SO GSP is really half Bigfoot. You can’t tell me that isn’t an advantage.

Also, as you can see from GSP’s appearance he was fed GH when he was a child for many years, hence why he hasn’t been caught for steroids!

This greasegate is just the tip pf the iceberg. I’m sure BJ’s next video will come out with someone taping GSP trimming his fur before his next fight to prove he is half Bigfoot.

by JonathanB on Feb 27, 2009 2:00 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

GSP LUBES!
GSP LUBES!
GSP LUBES

Is that the New England Cheatriots? No, it’s GSP!!!

*

Enough said

by Josh on Feb 27, 2009 2:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow, I guess the debate’s over then. Have you ever noticed how the people who end with comments like “enough said” always have the least intelligent arguments in their posts?

by GregC on Feb 27, 2009 10:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I tried posting last night from home but kept getting an error message. It may have been said by now, but I bet you that if Penn beats Florian he calls out GSP again knowing full well the fight will never happen. Penn will not let this go in an effort to salvage his pride.

by Shadyone33 on Feb 27, 2009 8:14 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Fighting and contests have always attracted cheats. More should be done because not only does this damage fighters integrity and honour, it damages the image of the sport as a whole. Honour and integrity in fighting seems a thing of the past in todays day and age

by WayofTheWarrior on Feb 27, 2009 11:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

If GSP cam forward and said publicly that he gave his word of honour that there was no intentional cheating, that would be good enough for me.

by WayofTheWarrior on Feb 27, 2009 12:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Hey guy’s stop giving BJ Penn such a hard time not to many guy’s in this world have to deal with having a mangina what would you do if you had a Mangina like BJ Penn?
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Mangina

by Puck Head on Feb 27, 2009 1:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

bj penn is hiv postive guys… confirmed today

by holyintellect on Feb 27, 2009 8:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

LOL

by nathan on Feb 28, 2009 12:15 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

lol!! CRY PENN!!

by Beaver on Feb 28, 2009 2:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

For all you GSP-bashers…pls view these videos before passing your judgement.

Cornermen makes mistake…even the best/licensed ones. Let’s put this GSP-cheating thing to bed, pls?

BBJ Penn, you really need to grow up and be a man…you have a freakin kid…lead by freakin example!

Taken from Luca26 post
***********
First let me start off by saying that I’m not trying to throw anybody under the bus. I am simply trying to show that Georges St-Pierre and his corner men may be taking way more criticism than they should be.

http://i640.photobucket.com/albums/uu122/mindcrime9/Hughes-Greaser.gif

The above link shows, NSAC cutman , Jacob “Stitch” Duran, accidentally applying a small amount of Vaseline to the shoulder of Matt Hughes in his fight against Thiago Alves in June of last year. Jacob is known as the best cutman in the game (NSAC Approved), and yet seemingly makes the same mistake as GSP cornerman, Phil Nurse, by rubbing Matt Hughes’ shoulder after applying Vaseline to his face. Kind of Ironic since Matt Hughes was one of the first guys to jump on the “GSP is a Greaser” bandwagon., don’t you think?

The video below is another example that shows Rich Franklin in his title fight vs Anderson Silva last year. A similar high profile fight as GSP-Penn 2, Rich’s cornerman seemingly applies Vaseline to Rich’s shoulder and neck, even leaving a visible gob of it on Rich’s left shoulder.

And Yet, all the controversy surrounds GSP. Why? Maybe because no one had noticed these things before? Maybe because both Hughes and Franklin lost those fights? Or maybe it is because people cannot seem to fathom how Georges was able to destroy a guy who was easily top 3 or 4 in the world. You decide.

by NewMMAFan on Mar 3, 2009 10:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ignorance is not an excuse here true i think GSP just has Penns number on any given night with that said GSP should not be punished but his corner should the rules state no vaseline regardless of what technique they used it for.

by gstatus on Mar 13, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


UFC blog for news, results, rumors, fights and tickets
Start posting on MMA Mania »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.


Managers

Mmamania_small MMAmania.com

Tomcat_small Jesse Holland

Authors

Small DrubySunshine

Small James Iannotti

Small Derek Bolender

Small Akimitsu Kuwabara

Adam_bomb_small Adam Wagner

Anthony-johnson-2_small Nate Lawson