Clay Guida: Bad hair, bad judging account for majority of 'Carpenter' split-decisions

People see the hair flying - someone throws a lazy jab and my hair goes crazy and some people can take that the wrong way. I tell you what, [judging has] gotta be the worst job - outside of that TV show 'Worlds Dirtiest Jobs' because I would not want to be a judge either so I give them a lot of credit, but I think they need to reevaluate some of the judges and their criteria for being chosen as UFC or professional mixed martial arts judges.
-UFC lightweight contender Clay Guida talks to host Larry Pepe on MMAmania.com's exclusive presentation of Pro MMA Radio regarding the high number of split-decisions "The Carpenter" has in his career, most recently against surging lightweight Nate Diaz at UFC 94 'St. Pierre vs. Penn 2' back on January 31. Guida outpointed and outwrestled the TUF 5 winner in a close contest that Guida believes was a unanimous rather than a split-decision win. One of the judges, along with the Diaz camp, does not concur.
For the audio replay of Guida’s appearance click here.
81 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
why not finish a fight…I mean try to finish a fight, instead of dry humping and holding onto your opponent!
by kevin on Feb 11, 2009 2:22 PM EST reply actions
to quote badr hari “all ive seen tonight, is a bunch of hugging, and kissing. all this hugging and shit, aint nothing. my rules, k1, stand up fighting, real knockouts…”
thats right!
by brendan on Feb 11, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions
he also got knocked the fuck out in that fight.
by Chief on Feb 11, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions
dang right, well put! fighters should finish each other off so we all could get our money’s worth[though it’s free UFC here in Flipland anyway]!
by Syd[a.k.a."The Negation"] on Feb 11, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
I want more DRAWS. If you don’t win by two points, you tie. It would make fighter records mean more. Someone consistently humping thier way to a decision would have a lot of draws instead of wins. Makes sense to me b/c if you were simply humped, but you weren’t damaged, you really didn’t lose a fight. And if you hump someone but don’t deliver significant damage, you didn’t really beat anyone up.
And then there are fights like Henderson vs Franklin where it seems wrong that Franklin get’s the same L for that fight that as BJ gets after getting dominated for four rounds.
by Punch You in the Ovaries on Feb 11, 2009 7:56 PM EST up reply actions
I agree there should be more draws but not for all 29-28 fights. They just need to be more liberal with giving out 10-10 rounds. Or they finally can remake the whole judging system like they should have done a long time ago.
by EazyEismydad on Feb 11, 2009 8:33 PM EST up reply actions
i saw the fight but i dont think it was that bad. for some reason this site seems to be hating on guida the most. he needs to disengage in the clinch a bit and let the arms go but it wasnt as bad as say rashad vs bisbing or hughes vs lytle or couture vs ortiz
by the heat on Feb 11, 2009 9:10 PM EST up reply actions
Eazy, I really would like to see all 29-28 fights called a draw. MMA is supposed to be more about the finish, not a drawn out point system like boxing. Even if we all agreed on a 29-28 decisoin, I don’t know…..I just feel like if you don’t whip the guys ass you don’t quite deserve a W. A L would mean you got your ass whooped. A W would mean you whooped the other guy’s ass. And a Draw would mean it was close, but no one took a real ass whoopin.
by Punch You in the Ovaries on Feb 11, 2009 11:52 PM EST up reply actions
You can’t put Couture VS Ortiz in there, they are respectively both brutal GnP guys that often TKO their opponent, for once Ortiz was the one to get the GnP,,, Guida is not even a devestating GnP guy… no one gets TKO’d, unless it’s Guida himself.
by DAVE A on Feb 12, 2009 2:38 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, but then there would be too many draws. There are a lot of finds where there is a fighter who is clearly ahead, but not exactly laying a beatdown on the other guy. I strongly agree with the 10-10 round being more liberal. Hendo/Franklin is a great example. Parisyan/Kim is even better. I still have no idea how anyone can say there was a clear cut winner in that fight.
As for the Diaz/Guida fight, I think Guida should have won unanimously. It was not an exciting fight, but if you judge the fight using the the system set forth by the UFC, it did seem that Guida was a clear winner. Of course, you could use that boring fight as an example of why the current rules should be changed.
by naturalshadow on Feb 12, 2009 7:16 AM EST up reply actions
One point can win you a World Series, Stanly Cup, or Super Bowl… one hundredth of a second can win you a Gold Medal or NASCAR Championship…. and one point cannot give you a win on an MMA card?
by DJ on Feb 12, 2009 7:25 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly DJ, because every example you mentioned isn’t subjective. You score the point or you don’t. However, with MMA there are human beings who have repeatedly screwed up these decisions. Even in boxing, it’s less subjective b/c it’s a lot of counting punches. In MMA, it’s never going to be easy to get everyone to agree and thus, I’d rather see draws than a win or loss that is based on whoever happened to be judging that night.
by Punch You in the Ovaries on Feb 12, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
This isn’t K1. Control of the opponent counts. You should find another sport to watch.
by Ethan on Feb 11, 2009 6:04 PM EST up reply actions
the thing i dont get about the scoring system in place, is when a wrestler takes a jits guy down, who should get the points for it? after all, isnt that where a jits guy wants to be also? diaz/geico fight was a great example, nate was closer then clay to finishing the fight ojn the ground. even more so on the feet also. my 2 cents for all that it matters.
by Egads on Feb 11, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions
Not if the wrestler gets an actual takedown. Even in a BJJ contest you are still awarded points for a takedown.
by naturalshadow on Feb 12, 2009 7:19 AM EST up reply actions
i am sick of people winning based on position alone, it is definetly a factor but you should not win a fight based on holding someone for 3 rounds, use your dominate postion to do something to try and end the fight not get a decision.
by roy on Feb 11, 2009 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
Amen brother. I think if someone is on top and hasn’t done any damage to their opponent in the last 10 seconds, they should be stood up. I’m sick of watching guys lay on their opponent and getting a win for it. That’s not a fight IMO.
by Spider Rulz on Feb 12, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe Guida is going for a different type of “finish” when he fights?
by CL on Feb 11, 2009 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
I love the caption I saw referencing Clay… “MMA so easy even a caveman can do it”
by Arnold on Feb 11, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions
oh grow up. you think he is gay? do you come to these conclusions from expert experence , or are you just as ignorant as you sound? female view.
by lynnbrooks on Mar 28, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions
This is rich coming from him.
The only reason he won the Nate fight is because Amercian judges’ criteria is catered more toward “control” aka stalling.And he still should have lost.
In PRIDE he would be yellow carded and not asked to return.
by R/p on Feb 11, 2009 8:37 PM EST up reply actions
I know a lot of grapplers disagree but if someone is stalling they should be separated instead of holding a dominant position. That’s why a lot of fighters have to cut weight. They are tired of losses due to being molested for 15 minutes. I also think a fighter should have to win by stoppage 2-3 consecutive fights before they get a title shot. Maybe bring in the yellow cards from pride. Subtrace $ from their purse. Judges should score it as a draw to prevent win bonuses. Most of all the UFC should stop rewarding crappy fights with fight of the night bonuses. Clay and Nate and Shogun and Coleman didn’t deserve to be rewarded. If there is no consequences it will continue. Fans should stop supporting these fighters. Boo them and don’t by the products they endorse.
by brandongk4 on Feb 11, 2009 8:49 PM EST up reply actions
The UFC should stop rewarding decision heavy fighters with fight of the night bonuses. They should also not get a win bonus for a split decision. I’m sick of the stalling. I love grappling but if they are not trying for the finish thats lame.
by brandongk4 on Feb 11, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
Solution: Get a haircut, you idiot.
Also, to be fair, most fans tend to see things the opposite way: “Oh, look! Clay’s flailing all over the place and flinging himself into the ground! He must be winning!”
by Ben! on Feb 11, 2009 2:24 PM EST reply actions
Absolutely! If Goldilocks is getting split decisions because of his hair, what’s the most prudent solution withing Guida’s grasp? Rotating out the old judges? Riiiggghhhht. Go to the friggin’ barber.
by Clayton on Feb 11, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
i’m soooo glad he beat that cocky punk! it wasn’t the most exciting fight, but i prefer to watch the ground game over the stand up anyways. so i thought it was a good fight. i do agree with the daiz camp, i think it was a close fight. and if nate and anyone else thinks that all guida did was “lay” on top of nate the entire fight i think they’re wrong. wrestling is part of mma, and if nate was unhappy with clay on top of him, then too bad!! he should have done something about it.
by Xander the Great on Feb 11, 2009 2:24 PM EST reply actions
is that you clay? I’l admit, every time Diaz took him down, Guida held on tight enough to not give up position!
by kevin on Feb 11, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
lol alot of hate kevin!! no its not clay, i’m his hair stylist! but anyways nate is a BJJ fighter and he had a standup advantage. clay used his wrestling to nullify nate’s BJJ and boxing. i just don’t like nate, so maybe that’s why i enjoyed the fight.
by Xander the Great on Feb 11, 2009 2:46 PM EST up reply actions
what hate? I complimented Guda for holding position, even during takedowns. By your own admission, Nate is the better BJJ guy and had a standup advantage, so Guida has to go Gray Maynard on him or could he train harder to improve on the skills he lacks?
by kevin on Feb 11, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
You are probably the only one who enjoyed that fight..
I like guida but that fight and the danzig fight was extremely boring… if he continues to fight like that i wont be a fan.
by mike22 on Feb 11, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t consider what Guida did wrestling. He dry humped him up against the cage. He rarely even “wrestled him to the ground.” Nobody does less damage in their fights than Guida.
by the king adrock on Feb 11, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions
i may be the only one that enjoyed the fight but i don’t care. i love the wrestling and bjj part of mma. i would love to see clay fight maynard, that is after gray beats miller. the reason why u guys say clay “dry humped” nate is because clay didn’t want to give up a dominant position. everyone knows how slick nate is with submissions, so naturally clay didn’t want to get caught. u guys call it boring, but i call it a brilliant strategy.
by Xander the Great on Feb 11, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions
Well I just hope his brilliant strategies stay on the undercards.
by JTD on Feb 11, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions
lol, I’m the biggest fan of bjj (besides Phil) on this site, nothing makes me happier than a night like saturday, but Guida doesn’t fit into that equation. Nate was taking him down at will, and guida was holding on. Yes he KEPT a position, but did nothing with it!
by kevin on Feb 11, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions
The Ballz on this caveman to complain about the judges! Diaz damages the F out of him, and he humps him in return! All he did the entire fight was hump away and throw an occasional Knee. Guida humped him so much that I think he covered almost every position in the entire KAMA SUTRA!!!!
If anyone should complain its Nate. Clay was Hurt at certain oints through out the fight while Nate was NEVER damaged. I look at it as a fight…winner should be dIAZ!!!
Pride had a much better scoring system than the UFC!!!!!
by john on Feb 11, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions
I know you love pride John, asdid I, but the corruption that plagued pride should never be compared to the testing and stringent rules that apply to UFC and nsac!
by kevin on Feb 11, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
Scoring SYSTEM!!!! JUDGING the fight as a hole, over the BS boxing scoring system! Not to mention the better rules! I agree about the corruption but how can you disagree with me on scoring the fight as a hole?
by john on Feb 11, 2009 4:39 PM EST up reply actions
at a quick glance I thought you called me an a@$hole. lol. NO, I can’t disagree, if someone pops right up after a take down (bisping/hammill) that should nullify the take down. I agree with you there john!
by kevin on Feb 11, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions
I was wondering if anyone else noticed that since we gave Machida so much shit on here that he changed his fighting style to be slightly more aggressive. He even said inhis interviews he was sick of people blogging about his “boring” fight style… Maybe clay will change up too once he reads how much we all hate him
by Sp00ner1234 on Feb 11, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
People who give Machida crap have never seen the inside of a gym or just hate on him, pure and simple.
Guida, unfortunately, has a boring style, no doubt.
by OJR on Feb 11, 2009 6:48 PM EST up reply actions
Hey Kevin, for a second it looked like john called you an asshole because he misspelled “whole”. Had he spelled the word correctly, there would have been no confusion.
by Spider Rulz on Feb 12, 2009 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
hay xander, i sooooo agree, thanks. so much clay bashing it is not even any type of sportsman ship. If these other guys are so great, should have been easy to get out of clays grip, sooo draw the conclusion. thanks again female view
by lynnbrooks on Mar 28, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Cut your hair then hippie. Hugs not drugs kids.
by scissorfight on Feb 11, 2009 2:24 PM EST reply actions
Ya sounds pretty simple right? He even admitted it and he still sounds confused..
by dayzah on Feb 11, 2009 2:29 PM EST up reply actions
well he already got the hugging part down… might be the best hugger in the business
by Riskreturngroup on Feb 11, 2009 2:28 PM EST reply actions
I agree he does have thwe best hugs in the business,but the Bully Gray Maynard also has some pretty good hugs.
A fight between these 2 would be a Hug-A-Thon.
by the Levi on Feb 11, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
mmm, as much as i like Guida as person.
But bro for hugging Nate Diaz all night, Guida
ought to be satisfied with a split decision.
The only highlight of the fight was the full nelson.
which i found cool.
But doggy style throughout is anti-fighting.
Or as I would call it “frustrate a fighter to the decision”.
Well fighters will do anything these days
to keep themsleves getting fired from the UFC.
by Slicerz on Feb 11, 2009 2:28 PM EST reply actions
Whatever this guy just dry humps all his opponents. I guess someone forget to tell him you can throw punches,knees and kicks in a MMA fight.
Clay “Im A Hugger Not A Fighter” Guida
by Hispanic Panic on Feb 11, 2009 2:46 PM EST reply actions
the last thing to be worried about is hair in your stupid eyes while in an MMA fight.. get a hair cut what are you stupid?
by bDavid on Feb 11, 2009 2:50 PM EST reply actions
HOW HE DOES HIS HAIR IS HIS BUSINESS., women like it, and he does get the women, do you? doubt it. I am a woman, educated, small and cute , as i said looovvveee him, female view.
by lynnbrooks on Mar 28, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Was he referring to the judges that gave him his last win?
by El Mexicutioner, formerly The Mexicutioner on Feb 11, 2009 2:50 PM EST reply actions
gotta agree with him. its nice to see him finally get a decision. the tyson fight couldve gone either way. i would love to see him and manyard fight next. winner has to be one fight away from a title shot.
by COR on Feb 11, 2009 2:53 PM EST reply actions
Agreed, and that still today is one of my favorite all time matches..
by SoCalStunNa on Feb 12, 2009 12:25 AM EST up reply actions
I’ve never seen a guy win as many times while inflicting ZERO damage in a fight. I mean at the end of the day it is a fight, right? And no way I give him the decision vs. Diaz so these comments are tough to take coming off that fight.
by JTD on Feb 11, 2009 3:04 PM EST reply actions
Nate could easily have been given that decision. Guida should thank his stars he got outta there with the W. But I guess he was due one since he got robbed in the Tyson Griffin fight.
If Nate didn’t initiate that takedown in the first, he could have won a UN, IMO. Before the fight I thought Guida was going to overpower him, but Nate is really coming along. If he keeps improving he’s going to be one of the best in the division in a couple years.
by revjames13 on Feb 11, 2009 3:12 PM EST reply actions
The more and more I hear or read what this guy says, the more annoyed I get with him. He is starting to warrant a BOYCOTT!!!
by El Mexicutioner, formerly The Mexicutioner on Feb 11, 2009 3:15 PM EST reply actions
I will admit this was a close fight to call. I was at the fight and had money on my boy Nate. Nate was pounding his face in the 3rd and his hair was only hiding the agony on his face. Cut that hair or wear a sock over it. When someones head and neck is getting snapped back after eating a strike it needs to be seen.
by dball on Feb 11, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions
Guida sucks donkey balls. His style is terrible. If I wanted to watch dry humping I’d tune in to NCAA wrestling. Guida did no damage and at no point ever tried to finish the fight; I’d have awarded the fight to Diaz.
by GoKillaB on Feb 11, 2009 3:30 PM EST reply actions
Guida gets the same criticism as Machida in a sense. Guida is doing what he can to win fights. And he isn’t breaking the rules…. may not be the most interesting but that’s MMA.
by shitleTOT.com on Feb 11, 2009 3:41 PM EST reply actions
You forgot one important detail. The way Machida fights actually inflicts damage. He’s always looking for the next strike, takedown, or finish. What strike or finish was HuggyBear looking for? He had 1 or 2 good takedowns. The rest were Nate’s takedowns that Huggybear just held on for the ride.
by Big Jake on Feb 11, 2009 5:11 PM EST up reply actions
Totally agree with this – Guida and Machida are simply not comparable. In Guida’s last 2 fights I honestly do not believe Guida hurt Diaz or Danzig once. ONCE in 30 minutes. In Machida’s last 2 fights Machida ended one in the first round via KO and he hurt Ortiz badly with a knee and used some GnP. Heck, in a fight that many people complained about his lack of action Machida inflicted more damage than Guida has in his last 2 fights. And I can’t believe I’m comparing Guida and Machida…these guys are on completely different levels. If I never see Clay Guida fight again it can’t possibly be a bad thing.
by JTD on Feb 11, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions
I just don’t like fighters that ‘eekk out’ wins.
That ref should’ve broken up that silly rear-bear hug he kept resorting to when he avoided Diaz’s stand-up.
Smash ’em, never quit…
by Ground-Game on Feb 11, 2009 3:56 PM EST reply actions
I’m also a fan of wrestling and BJJ, but what he did in that fight was neither. He looked like a bouncer just trying to hold on to someone in a bar, and he was apparently awarded points for it, so why is he complaining. Nate did apologize for not listening to his corner and initiating many of the clinches and takedowns though.
by D on Feb 11, 2009 4:07 PM EST reply actions
I don’t like diaz and was glad to see him lose. Clay needs to get a haircut he looks like an idiot in there. If some wrestler just holds on to you its the fighters job to get him off or submit him or get a reversal, diaz couldn’t control clay and he deserved to lose. At the same time clay needs to learn how to finish fights by either ground an pound or submit.
by nathan on Feb 11, 2009 4:24 PM EST reply actions
I honestly can’t see how diaz thinks he won this fight, he clearly didn’t…..how? He and his camp and delusional.
by nathan on Feb 11, 2009 4:27 PM EST reply actions
I agree nathan…I really don’t see how Nate thinks he won that either.
by MM_Eh on Feb 11, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
Diaz will try and finish fights guida try’s to control fights.guida will never build a fan base.
by dball on Feb 11, 2009 8:07 PM EST up reply actions
Well at least he fights better than his brother.
by Ognitinoc on Feb 11, 2009 6:10 PM EST reply actions
I had money on diaz and watched the fight live, I will admit it was close. But clay needs to try and finish a fight all out, not just control the fight. He will never have a fan base until he figures this out.
by dball on Feb 11, 2009 8:03 PM EST reply actions
Well I guess I am Clay’s #1 fan! Sorry but Diaz acted like a chump. If he is a BJJ master then why could he not solve the problems he was having. Man you guys just can’t get over this one.
by Brian "CLAY "THE TICK" GUIDA on Feb 11, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
hate to brake your bubble, clay DOES a fan following, and we will stick with him, as in anything, the more you do it, the better you get, he has, does, and will. female view
by lynnbrooks on Mar 28, 2009 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I like the saying, don’t leave it to the judges!
by phenomenal angel on Feb 12, 2009 12:55 AM EST reply actions
Diaz won the fight, straight up. Guida Huggy Bear Clay and Diaz were so close in performance you HAVE TO give Diaz the fight on takedowns, standup and an overall more technical approach….
by Rilly on Feb 12, 2009 4:18 AM EST reply actions
I had Clay clearly ahead in that fight! And I ‘ve always said they need better (MMA) educated judges! I’s still a tough job though!
by Dana's a Crossdresser on Feb 12, 2009 1:29 PM EST reply actions

by 






















