I guess sex sells..

your implying the better wrestler wins in an MMA match when this is a sport where no one is restricted to just one discipline. Randy is winning TITLE fights in his 40’s, name another fighter thats done that. Name another fighter thats been the underdog in that many match’s and come out on top. You can’t. And to say that he’s winning all these fights just because he’s the better wrestler is plain ignorance. These are MMA match’s not wrestling match’s. Most of these guys had youth, size and stand up over Randy.

And how about the third round in the Silvia fight when Randy out pointed Tim on the feet, without going to the ground at all. He also got the better of Chuck Liddell in their stand up exchanges the first time they fought as well.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND WE HAVE A WINNER IN THE DEBATE! “O damn he got caught”

You’re right, MMA isn’t just wrestling. Case in point, the reason Randy outpointed Tim on the feet was because Tim was never going to take Randy down, therefore Randy didn’t have any distractions while striking (i.e. front foot forward, best position for striking….without worrying about getting taken down).

He can’t do that with Brock.

Lol, so how did you get off arguing that this is a worthless card and a freak show to arguing technicalities of a fight between Randy and Brock?

Anyway, i’m done you don’t wanna watch it, thats your business, I think this is a great card and will be a great fight.

The technicalities of the fight are what make it so fucking boring. Randy won’t get off with striking (because his stance will be complete opposite of what it was with Tim……front foot back, defending takedown, type of stance), therefore all of the striking you saw against Tim is not going to happen.

This fight has “snoozer” written all over it.

Yes, keep reading into your crystal ball, o psychic genius…

Oh, so I see.

All the self proclaimed experts around here just make predictions solely based on who they want to win, then when someone actually uses some fighting knowledge to make his predictions, he’s a moron.

Why don’t you guys ever use some knowledge about fighting to predict, or do you not have any MMA sense……or BALLS?

I didn’t even concede that the info you used was factual or good, I don’t see the fight going like that. I have no clue how you sit here and think you know exactly what Couture is gonna do. Why aren’t you a world class fighter/trainer then? I agree with Couture, that Brocks style is straight ahead, how much experience does he have with boxing footwork/angles? Stand up is part of the package also, so are subs, Brock has wrestling and gnp thus far, thats it, this is an MMA match. The more well rounded fighter will pull out the win. I completely disagree with you. Coutures striking and his overall mma game have improved drastically since he fought at LHW, and there’s no reason to think that he hasn’t picked up a few new tricks in his down time considering the guy never stops training.

Why don’t you use some SENSE before you post, cause saying Couture’s nothing but an old washed up has been who won ONE fight when he was the underdog is about the most ignorant statement posted that I’ve ever read. He’s an olympic caliber wrestler and a 5 time UFC champion, and the only man in MMA history to ever win a belt 5 times, show him some respect. And now, I am done, you can sit here and argue with yourself, I DO NOT agree w/ u, I DO NOT see things your way, but I do know one thing, and thats that NO ONE knows whats going to happen until we see it, and I’m looking forward to it. Keep your pecimism and your negative/condescending attitude to yourself mrs. cleo.

Come on mania, dont maderhate me…

“5 time champion” = 5 time loser.

You will be the first one I laugh at when my prediction comes to fruition.