MMA Mania: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Anderson Silva claims the 205-pound title belongs to Lyoto Machida

anderson silva
Props: Tatame.com

Quoteworthy:

"[Fighting at 205 pounds] is an experience we are doing for several reasons, and one of them is a request from Dana White…. I don’t have a desire to fight in this category and am only doing it because I was asked and I think I can. I have no desire to dispute this belt because Lyoto has already proven that it belongs to him. I am taking this fight because I like to fight and I like the challenges."

UFC Middleweight Champion Anderson Silva shares some insight on his move up to light heavyweight to take on James Irvin at UFC Fight Night 14. "The Spider" reveals that he has no intentions of competing for the 205-pound belt as long as undefeated training partner and friend, Lyoto Machida, is in the picture. However, there is not telling when Machida will get his shot at championship glory -- there is quite a long line of potential challengers in the division.

(Thanks to MMAmania.com reader "Marcos" for the translation.)

0 recs  |  Comment 219 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

he should stay at middle weight so Bisping can beat the best for the title.

by Tony on Jul 9, 2008 10:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who gave you drugs??

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Bisbing beats Leben he should have one more fight before he gets a title shot.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bisping should beat Leben and Cote then fight for the title.

by Kenton on Jul 9, 2008 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wtf? Cote is not gonna fight Bisping whats the sense in that, he just beat Almeida for christ sake and is pretty much guranted a title shot in December or somewhere round there, Bisping is fighting in October so do you think Cote is gonna waste his time and put his title shot on hold to fight Bisping. Bisping will probably face Quarry after the Leben fight and if he wins them he’ll get a title shot and your crazy if you think Bisping can beat Silva.

by Macho Bullshit on Jul 9, 2008 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Was this response to my comment. Becuase Cote is not guranteed a title shot after his performance. In the post fight interview Cote even stated he might not get a shot at the title after that fight. Maybe he will but there was never a gurantee. Also, you’re right Bisping will never beat Silva.

by Kenton on Jul 9, 2008 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe Cote’s title shot will be against Okami. (just kidding). But no one is even considering that.

by Kenton on Jul 9, 2008 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Never say never. I thought Forrest would never beat Rampage. Boy was I wrong! I do agree with you Kenton, Cote doesn’t deserve a title shot after a performance like that.

by jimmy_dean on Jul 9, 2008 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only issue is that Anderson is running out of top notch opponents at 185.

by halljam2 on Jul 9, 2008 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol
Every time Mania uses this pic I laugh because Anderson looks Hi-High!

by SaVaGe on Jul 9, 2008 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your right.. Looked like he smoked el fatty.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lyoto is the future. He is an animal. Go to youtube and watch him Kick Rich Franklin’s Ass…..Vicious Knockout

by Patrick on Jul 9, 2008 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what does everyone think about a rule that would not allow fighters to be saved by the bell when caught in a submission. the would have to escape to end the round, no transitioning into different sumbissions, just either get out or you lose.

then tito would have beat machida and we could stop all this nonsense. the guy is extremely talented but he’s gonna lose sooner or later, my guess is sooner if he fights anybody named silva

by crowls on Jul 9, 2008 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree… a round ends when the bell sounds. How long would you be allowed to hold someone in a triangle after the bell sounds and what if they started to slip could you reposition? All of this happening after the round ends??? Not a chance…

by DJ on Jul 9, 2008 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The bell didn’t save Machida in that fight, he escaped because Tito let go of it. Please watch it again.

by Tricky Nick on Jul 9, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

just a thought, hate seein a guy about to get his arm snapped, then comin back to win the later rounds and the fight when he was clearly beaten. I know it’s probly not practical, too much gray area.

by crowls on Jul 9, 2008 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If that rule would have been around back when BJ and Pulver fought the first time, BJ would have won the belt that night.

by Haze on Jul 9, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The rule would never work, for example if someone was getting ground and pound and the bell rang it would be the same situation for the submission. The bell is the bell

by mrfancypants on Jul 9, 2008 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Machida wasn’t saved by the bell vs Tito. At least watch the fight before commenting on it

by yohnstoppable on Jul 9, 2008 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe a restart from the same position in the next round but no the bell is the bell!

by the heat on Jul 9, 2008 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just get rid of rounds and let them go at it till it’s done. That is the only way to go if you want to make it real. At the very least make it a 15 minute fight and a 25 min champion’s fight. No breaks, just pure will and heart.

by Zacchaeus on Aug 2, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bisping is done for, Leben is going to retire that fool. Tony why are you always swinging off Bispings nuts please tell me your from England and I can respect that, Your boy tearing it up in the U.S but if your from backwoods wwf kansas you should know bispings not shit look at the fights he had. Day, Lost to evans, Lost to Hamil(yes he did) Sinosac who knocked bisping on his ass, Shcafer, Haynes, O shit The chainsaw. No notable wins if he beats Leben I will shut and change my tune but i doubt it.

by jsoph on Jul 9, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leben lost to Kalib Starnes for god’s sake. Bisping wins the fight in the second round by TKO.

by jimmy_dean on Jul 9, 2008 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

GEEZ, Machida and Silva’s comments must be rubbing Dana White the wrong way lately, White hates it when fighters publicly undermine his efforts and say who they won’t fight, especially for the belt!

by THORAZINE on Jul 9, 2008 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bisping will never be the middle wieght champ

by dave on Jul 9, 2008 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bisping should have to get passed hendo before he gets a shot.

by DeMo on Jul 10, 2008 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny,

I thought Griffin was the 205 champ. Does Silva have a crystal ball?

by OJR on Jul 9, 2008 10:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He checks out the top of his head in the mirror, in it’s shine gleams the fighting future of each division..

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly….i honestly think Forrests height, aggression, and in and out stradegy would be the worst style match up for Machida right now..unless a wrestler like Rampage, hendo, or Rashad can take a punch or kick in order to get him down and control him, which all three may be able to do…needless to say, i disagree with Anderson, that belt is forrests right now, and Lyota needs to fight someone who is willing to get hit to make him exciting, then beat him, until then i dont see him getting that belt

by mma dude on Jul 9, 2008 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What happened to Anderson’s class and respect??? Why would the belt be Machida’s? Wheres the respect for Forrest? Machida needs to beat a top 5 or atleast a top 10, and be exciting before he gets anywhere near the belt.

by JV on Jul 9, 2008 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think something might have been lost in translation. I am assuming he was trying to say (or said) that the title shot is Machida’s not his (Silva’s).

by Mikemick on Jul 9, 2008 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking the same thing, usually Silva is very respectfull of other fighters.

by Haze on Jul 9, 2008 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Machida would out-point Forrest’s even if Forrest had the reach advantage. i think he is just So Much quicker than Griffin.

Silva’s probably just pissed coz his pal hasn’t been given the nod yet for a title shot. I think he deserves it.

Forrest and Griffin were supposed to face each other at UFC 76 anyway!

by Spawn on Jul 9, 2008 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

damn I would love to see Forrest fight Griffin .. wait a sec… what???

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Forrest and Machida were supposed to face each other at UFC 70, not UFC 76.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

O damn-

LOL. Good stuff.

by OJR on Jul 9, 2008 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Machida has beaten top ten and top five fighters.

by TrueMMa on Jul 9, 2008 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Machida and Silva train with each other and same with Filho

by mrfancypants on Jul 9, 2008 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

dont forget the nogueira’s.. machida and anderson were coaches on this TUF that just wrapped up.. i seen that somewhere on google

by randy murders on Jul 9, 2008 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I want to see Machida fight Wandy, and if by some miracle he wins, then I would have to join the crowd and say give him a shot. At the moment, I see no reason for the UFC to risk having such a boring fighter (Machida) as their champion. Yes, he is very skilled, and his style is effective, but in the biggest division in the UFC, you should really be able to finish a majority of your fights to be a champion.

by naturalshadow on Jul 10, 2008 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ahhh’ I see Silva gets a little cocky now n’ then, even though he is mostly respectful to his opponents.

by THORAZINE on Jul 9, 2008 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sounded more like a fact than a prediction to me… i guess machida won the belt when he beat the champ soko, and then defended it against number 1 challenger tito ortiz… didn’t u guys hear, we are in the midst of the most dominant lhw reign in ufc history, he’s cleaned out the division, time to move up to HW

by crowls on Jul 9, 2008 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The current best pound per pound fighter on this side ofthe galaxy has spoken the truth. John posted on Mania yesterday what Lyoto’s opinion on the fight was.. Like most us know.. The ufc wants to give a title shot to Chuck..not because he is the most deserving..but because he is the “Iceman”..and they want to keep milking the UFC Cow.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 10:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who is more deserving than Chuck? Machida should try beating a top 10 guy before openning his mouth. Machida is the only one getting an easy road to a title shot. Chuck has fought Wandy and was going to fight Shogun (its not Chucks fault Shogun got hurt) So if Chuck beats Rashad he definatly deserves a shot.

by JV on Jul 9, 2008 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

JV: Come on man, you are better than that! How is Machida supposed to beat a top 10 guy, when they are all afraid to fight him? He has fought and dominated everyone that the UFC has put in front of him, its not his fault that none of the top fighters want any part of him!

U think Chuck deserves a title shot? r u kidding me? Lets look at his recent record:
Lost to Rampage
Lost to Jardine
Win against Wanderlei
? Rashad Evans

Now u think that is a resume of someone who should be fighting for the title in the best division in mma?

If Chuck beats Rashad he definetly DESERVES a shot? THats freaking Histerical man! I realy hope u werent being serious!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well I was being serious and this is why. Anderson/Leban then title shot, Rampage/Eastman then title shot, Penn/Pulver then title shot. Who else has done more for the UFC’s popularity than Chuck? So Chuck/Wandy should have brought him back, but he was still going to fight Shogun thats 2 top 10 guys. Who has Machida fought thats top 10??? At least let him fight 1 top 10 guy, then maybe a title shot. And he has to make it exciting.

by JV on Jul 9, 2008 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its takes two fighter’s to see a action packed fight.

When Chuck was LHW Champ..he had all but cleaned the “wrestlers” in the division. Page had killed him in Pride.. that’s why Page got a warm up fight and was pitted against Chuck..who else at the time was more worthy of a title shot??

Who was threat to Franklins title at the time. He defened his title against Evan Tanner, Nate Quarry, Daveid L..who was a threat at middle weight to Fanklin then. Silva was.. that’s why he got his title shot after his warm up fight with Leben. ( And how he beat Leben put an ! on why he deserved the title shot.

Chuck loses to Page. Loses to Jardine. wins a decision over Wandy..will most likely beat " another wrestler "..in Rashad.. and he gets a title shot over either Thiago Silva/ Machida who are IMO the 1 and 2 top contenders today for the title..outside of Page..who deserves a rematch.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

JV, I have made the same point before, but no one will listen. As far as timing is concerned it needs to be Machida. We had to wait 9 months last time and Chuck doesn’t fight for a couple more months. That would mean we have to wait until the end of the year. Machida is ready now. I do not want to wait to see Forrest fight again for 6 months. The only other option would be an immediate rematch with Rampage (which I don’t think he deserves).

by BNF on Jul 9, 2008 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

PhilQNY, I can agree to an extent. But you guys are still not answering the question. Who has Machida faced thats top 5 or even top 10? To me a win over Wandy is way better than 10 wins with B-Level fighters. And if you just look at Chucks last 3 fights then yes, no title shot yet. But a win over a guy who destroyed Rampage. Instead of a Machida win over Tito who is past his prime. Who would you prefer?

by JV on Jul 9, 2008 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BNF, if Machida got his title shot in that (timing) then I guess it would be ok. But to say Machida deserves it is wrong. I say give him a top guy, and if he wins, (no matter how boring) then yes give him the shot after that.

by JV on Jul 9, 2008 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

People still to forget that Soko was top 10 before Lyoto schooled him, and some rankings still have Soko top 10. Some rankings still also had Tito in the top 10 before Lyoto beat him. Tito had fought Rashad to a draw, and could have won if he hadn’t grabbed the fence. Rashad had won all his fights coming in to that fight. Lyoto has also beat BJ Penn (who’s dangerous in any weight), and KTFO’d Rich Franklin.

by Pat on Jul 9, 2008 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

JV: I get what u r saying, but Machida doesnt turn down fights…his opponents do…U cant blame the guy because none of the top fighters want ot fight him…In my oppinion he is floating at the top of the division right now, if no one wants to take a chance at dethrowning him, then let him fight for the title!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone who says Machida hasn’t fought anyone good is stupid. He fought Sokodju who was and still is in the top 10. He fought Tito who basically beat Rashad. I don’t believe this, people say Chuck should get the title shot if he beats Rashad. Machida beat Tito who proved he was better then Rashad and only earned a draw beceause he’s an idiot and grabbed the fence. Machida is undefeated and has dominated everyone who has been put infront of him including Sokodju (a top 10 fighter) and Tito (Who is every bit as good as Rashad) and needless to mention he’s not coming off 2 losses like Liddell. Liddell beat Wandy and all the sudden he’s the #1 contender? This is complete bullshit.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

TIME OUT PHIL:

Thiago Silva a top 2 contender. Who has he beat? Houston….Drwal….injury win over Irvin….come on man. Don’t get me wrong, I think this kid is the future of the division, but his undefeated record isn’t exactly glowing with top level opposition. A. Silva should already be higher up the contender list than Thiago. Lets put this all to rest here and have Machida fight Thiago, then we don’t have to have these arguments about neither one beating a top tier guy. Title eliminator.

Personally I got Thiago in that fight. He is a stone cold killer against a guy with ZERO killer instinct. Tactician sure, but Machida has no animal in him. A. Silva is elusive and fights in and out, but when he is clearly outclassing an opponent or smells blood, he beats on them viciously until they crumble. He throws enough steam on every shot to hurt you, but doesn’t overcommit. This in my opinion, is what Mach. doesn’t do. Sit down on your shots a little more and try to hurt somebody, there’s no way he should be so afraid to get taken down that he fights the way he does. Showed good takedown D against tito, and I’m sure has plenty of Jits off his back. at least enough to defend and get stood back up. Very talented guy, but needs to get after it man. He’ll never see big money, even as a champion if he doesn’t start going for broke. There’s a big difference between the way he fights and the wreckless style that Leben and Forrest used to have. Both those guys have settled down and fight effectively now but Leben’s got power so still finishes guys. There’s no doubt in my mind Machida can do the same and look alot like the spider in doing so but he’s gotta get his out of it and let the killer loose. Stop treating this like an athletic competition to score points and pretend the guy fucked your wife

by crowls on Jul 9, 2008 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

While Chuck’s performances in his last three fights have not been impressive collectively, he was a champion for several years. Most guys that have held a belt that long would get a rematch or shot at the belt again fairly soon. Chuck obviously wasn’t going to get it against Rampage after getting manhandled twice. I would at least understand why he would get his shot and wouldn’t complain.

However, if they don’t give Lyoto the shot next, they need to make a definitive #1 contender’s match with him involved so there is no question about the caliber of opponents he has faced and hopefully boost his popularity a little so fights aren’t made (or more specifically avoided) based on his marketability.

by PJJ on Jul 9, 2008 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

TIME IN…

Well in regards to Thiago Silva..The UfC is not marketing him right..really they are not marketing him at all.. Does anyone know who he is??? Take a step back and look at the LHW picture. Who today deserves a title shot? Who would be in a 1 number one contender fight??

Well..Page gets an automatic rematch first and fore most.

Thaigo Silva vs Machida would be a good match up to decide a number 1 contender.

Wandy is still in the mix. He can fight one of the names above to get closer to a title shot. ( some may say..oh Wandy lost to Chuck..right.. well Chuck lost to Jardine who Wandy just retired from the UFC.. and Chuck supposable is getting a title if he beats Rashad Evans. )

Chuck vs Rashad.. what does that fight decide? It shouldn’t be for the title.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you forgetting that if Rahsad beat Chuck that that fool will get a title shot as well? I know Chuck lost to Rampage, but alot of people seem to forget that was when he HAD the belt, most people get a rematch after winning just 1 fight after loosing the belt. See Matt Hughes, Randy Couture….I dont have a problem with Chuck getting a title shot if he beats Rashad. I mean come on….If lyoto is that good, then he will eventually get a shot and beat whoever has the belt at that time right? Giving a title shot to Chuck is not that bad…trust me it could be worse.

by Chadx23 on Jul 9, 2008 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think that Chuck/Evans is a “true #1 contender fight”. I believe that if Chuck wins, he gets a title shot. If Rashad wins, the title picture gets even more blurry, so the UFC would book Forrest/Machida. Then they can have Evans fight Wanderlei in a #1 contender fight.

by ViolentMike on Jul 9, 2008 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, but they didn’t lose the fight after they lost the belt like Chuck did.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although I do believe that there are others out more deserving of a title shot, Chuck will get it after hopefully destroying evans.
Machida is a beast, but not the most exciting of fighters IMO. I would like to see him face Rampage for a number one contender to take on the winner of Forrest/(winnerof Chuck/Evans)

Tyler

by T_Saun77 on Jul 9, 2008 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

man tito beat rashad. and machida beat soko and tito who are both top ten ufc guys. tito beat forest i seem to remember. who would you call top ten? jardine?way too many losses! wanderlei? the same thing!

1.forest
2.lyoto
3.rampage
4.rashad
5.chuck
6.sokoudjou
7.shogun(if he gets fit)(big if)
8.w.silva
9.T.silva
10.jardine

give – hamill irvin andbonnar a look in too

by the heat on Jul 9, 2008 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m getting tired of saying it on every Machida link but it frustrates the f*ck out of me how overlooked Thiago is.

He just snapped Mendes’s 11 fight winning streak, Drwal’s 13 fight winning streak dominated Alexander when everyone else was scared to fight him and holds a win of sorts over Irvin who is getting a lot of hype.

He has as good a record as Machida (ok minus the wins over big names) but is exciting as fu*k to watch and finishes fights.

If the UFC don’t give him a big name fight next outing i’m going back to boxing ; )!!!!!

Thiago vs Wand
Thiago vs Machida
Thiago vs Jardine
Thiago vs Soko
Thiago vs Franklin (after Hamill)
Thiago vs Shogun
Thiago vs Rampage
Thiago vs Hendo

That being said can anyone answer how long he has been at Chute Box? Will there be issues with him fighting Wand/Shogun?

by Nick J on Jul 9, 2008 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He isnt at chutebox any longer. I believe he trains with ATT down in Coconut creek Florida. I dont think he would have any problems fighting wandy or Shogun, but I say give him Machida 1st.

Stylistically Thiago is the best match up to make a Machida fight exciting to all u bloodthirsty fans who dont appreciate the strategical excellence that Machida displays in every one of his fights.

JV: Come on man, because Chuck was willing to fight shogun, thats supposed to count for sopmething? Chuck should get a title shot because he was willing to fight Shogun? Who is to say that Chuck wouldnt have gotten KO against Shogun? then were would your posterboy be?

I just think that division is too great to be worrying about which fighter is the most marketable….Let the best and most deserving fighters fight for the title! Simple as that!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cheers, have checked your right, he’s at ATT, my bad. Agree Thiagos aggressive style might be the perfect foil for Machida’s.

by Nick J on Jul 9, 2008 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the idea of Silva vs Machida. That would answer alot of questions and make for a bonafide #1 contender.

In between the brass and ass can give Chuck another shot at the title…like it or not that is going to happen so get it over with already.

by SaVaGe on Jul 9, 2008 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nick:

Thiago is never overlooked by me, I’ve been nut hugging this guy for ages.

Whoever gets the next title shot at Forrest, has a very very good chance of wearing the belt.

Rest assured, Dana will make that the most marketable fighter possible. That rules Lyoto out, sad but true.

Personally I think all this weight class jumping is a crock of sh_te. Choose you weight and stick to it or move permanently.

I personally think that the fighters should all fight at the weight of their respective weight class on the night of the fight. This would make it fair giving no fighters any advantage.

Some peoples genetics enable weight cutting and subsequent weight gain easier than others

by Auto “I like little boys” mation on Jul 9, 2008 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There he is. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by BNF on Jul 9, 2008 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

F_@k off BNF lol (Showing middle finger) LMAO!

by Auto “I like little boys” mation on Jul 9, 2008 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’ve been nuthugging Thiago for ages? You mean since he was a little boy?

by James S on Jul 9, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i bet machida bores chicks to sleep in the sack… he’s like “ok, let me tickle that for a sec, wait don’t wanna finish u so i’ll back off for a minute, yup, now i’m grabbin that, ok, and rest, don’t touch me there just yet, and……you’re asleep ok, I WIN!…. aahhhh sweet victory”

by crowls on Jul 9, 2008 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hahahaha

by naturalshadow on Jul 10, 2008 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Elusive Machida would not be able to handle the pressure of Thiago Silva. How about Thiago vs Anderson Silva?! oooOOOOooOOoo. Thiago has the most exciting 1 sided beatdowns in ALLLLLL of MMA and he does that throat slasshing thing after wit the other guy still on his back (in the background). daym!

by kama kaze on Jul 9, 2008 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OH, like he couldnt handle the pressure of Sokaju, or the pressure of Penn, or what about Franklin, and we all thought he wouldnt be ableto handle the pressure of Tito. GET OUTA HERE thats what they say before all of his matches. " Dont know if he can handle the pressure that this fighters gonna bring." The qeustion is can they handle the pressure he’s going to bring. Can they stay calm in the face of almost sure defeat. Can they handle the frusteration after the first round is over, and they are all banged up, yet have not touched Machida once. Can they handle the pressure IMO is the better question.

by TrueMMa on Jul 9, 2008 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you are talking about: Machida touched the other guy more.
i’m talking about: Thiago puts people on their back. down and out.
do you see the difference and why machida sux?

by kama kaze on Jul 9, 2008 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who has Thiago fought. Houston and his weak chin? Who else. No body thats who. If he fought Machida he would end up like the rest. Going home and asking “what the f-ck just happend?”
Thiago has never fought a top ten guy so I would say he needs to still prove himself.
And Machida sucks? Tell that to everyone who has fallen to him.

by TrueMMA on Jul 9, 2008 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thiago Silva has boat loads of potential but he has not faced a Top 10 opponent. Lyoto has. Believe it or not, Tito was still Top 10 in the UFC and Soko was Top 10 the day he was signed.

Lyoto does not suck. I was not a fan of his until the Nakamura fight. I almost fell asleep watching him fight Senator Sam Hoger… But ever since his 3rd UFC fight, I have been a BIG fan of his.

by ViolentMike on Jul 9, 2008 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

GAURENTEEEE Machida wouldn’t KO HALF or EVEN 1/4 the guys Thiago did. And even if Thiago lost to a sokoudju or Tito, at least he’d be going down swinging, which in my opinion deserves more respect than a lack luster snoozefest “W”.

by kama kaze on Jul 9, 2008 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that makes no sense. So if Machida wins by decision, he deserves to move down in the rankings. But if he lost by KO, he moves up in the rankings?

Logic and Statistics must have been your worst class in school!

by ViolentMike on Jul 10, 2008 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hey, kama kaze…just sayin’…wtf happened in that fight, huh? HAAAAhhahahahahahahahaha

by mtnboy on Aug 10, 2009 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good post Nick. I am a big Machida fan but you are right Thiago deserves a few big name opponents as well. I would love to see Machida vs Thiago.

John I think you are right about Machida Vs Thiago being a very exciting fight. That would be a great fight to watch.

I also agree with you in the fact that people do not appreciate how tactical Machida is. He is so sound and precise in everything he does. I can’t wait to see who his next opponent is.

Also just because he hasn’t finished many fights in the UFC does not mean that he is boring to watch. I thought the Ortiz fight was exciting, the Soko fight, and the Kaz fight were great as well. Sometimes you don’t get lucky and sometimes you get those fighters that are difficult to finish.

Truthfully I have enjoyed everyone of his fights in the UFC. It is amazing to see his athleticism at work. To me it is amazing to see a fighter like Machida, no one can figure him out. He rarely gets hit and is almost never in a bad position.

by MMAFan1981 on Jul 9, 2008 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

MMAfan, I hear you! I dont know about everyone else, but since the nakamura fight Machida has been really exciting. Its amazing to watch him fight for 15 minutes, tagging people up, while remaining untouchable….U cant hit Machida…and if you cant hit him, u sure as hell cant beat him!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thiago was supposed to fight Evans at UFC 84, but when Shogun went down the fight was scrapped.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are pathetic if you think Machida deserves a shot. I cant wait until Irvin dismantles Silva with leg kicks and then puts him to sleep. I have lost all respect for Silva thinking he is all high and mighty, please Irvin put this clown sleep for good. Machida is the most boring fighter on the planet I hope he gets put to sleep as well, maybe after Irvin tucks in Silva he can put machida to sleep.

by Colin D on Jul 9, 2008 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are absolutley without a doubt insane. Thats it. Pure insanity.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is this a translation thing? Maybe spidey means that Machida has shown that he has the skills to win the belt?

by SaVaGe on Jul 9, 2008 10:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machida will get KTFO sooner or later….everyone always does. I know he is good and respect his skills, but his style just makes for boring matches. The ony good part about his fight with Tito was when he took him down and then towards the end he dropped Tito with a knee to the body, but that was quickly forgotten when Tito caught him in a triangle lol. Anyway, I dont see Machida hanging with the true big boys at 205, Liddell, Rampage, Wanderlei….ect.

by Chadx23 on Jul 9, 2008 10:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you think he was going to hang with Soko at UFC79?? Machida got crazy skills..look at Tito’s face in between rounds

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Soko looked lost on the ground, and he’s supposed to be a jits guy I thought, I don’t think a flash knock out over Nog shoulda earned soko top LHW status and lyoto vs Soko was still boring anyhow, yawn. However I do think Machida can hang with any top tier LHW I just don’t think I would pay $$ to watch Machida pick shots and dance around the cage for 5 rds to win a decision on a title shot. Face it, no matter how good the guy is, he’s just plain boring..

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

O dam he got caught: Why not you paid to watch Forrest Griffin do the same thing against Rampage….Machida does it better!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea I know, that sucked so bad I wanted to take my hat off my head and rip it in half, but I couldn’t rip the fabric so I just stomped on it a couple times..

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ohhhhhhhh..John is spitting Flames…rapid fire. Ouch.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

However, my friends said they’d still rather watch me stomping on my hat than a fight with Machida in it…

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless my hat gets caught in the wind, and I have to chase it around to stomp on it, then it’s just as entertaining as watching a Machida fight…

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Guess what? Forrest realizes that he has no Power in his strikes (besides kicks) so he will now fight just like Machida when facing power punchers….So if you dont like the way Machida fights, u arent going to enjoy watching Forrest to defend his title because he will do exactly what Machida does, stick and move, avoid getting hit, with his best and probably only chance of finishing a fight being via submission.

I dont understand how people thought that Machida vs. Ortiz was boring. I loved that fight, I thought it was very exciting and both me and my brother were at the edge of our seats while watching it!

I do understand where the Machida haters are coming form because I used to hate the guy and used to find him very boring, but since tyhe Nakamura fight he has turned up the heat and I have found his fights to be very exciting!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m just hoping the guy takes a few more chance’s in the future, I like fighters like Wandy that are willing to get in there and try to take the other guys head off. Machida seems content to win a decision but not win the fight, it’s like he doesn’t have any desire what-so-ever to finish a guy, he just wants to make it 3 rds and take his decision. I wanna see the guys heart tested, and as far as I’m concerned no one has done that yet.

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Machida does everything Forrest does better. He lands quicker and moves away faster. Forrest actually gets hit Machida doesn’t. People don’t like Machida beceause he doesn’t get hit. Since when do you have to get punched in the face to be exciting?

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not getting the comparision of Machida and Forrest here. Tito is not a heavy hitter so I think Forrest would have brawled with him. Don’t see the relation of Forrest’s game plan against a guy like Chuck or Rampage which is not to get repeatedly hit in the face is like Machida’s game plan against anyone which is not to get hit all. When people bought the Forrest Rampage fight they were not expecting a decision or even a win by Forrest so it again that didn’t make sense either. Forrest cannot hit as hard as the big dogs but he’ll throw done none the less and he will take a hit to give a hit. I don’t say what Lyoto does is wrong but I know it is completely different than what Forrest does.

by Smokes on Jul 9, 2008 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

forrest did brawl with tito actually lol dont forget they fought tito won by a decision

by randy murders on Jul 9, 2008 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL comparing Machida to Forrest is the funniest thing Ive heard all day other than these Machida nut huggers whining about being neglected of a title shot. Forrest goes balls to the wall, Id love to see Machida go up against Rampage and get schooled. After Irvin ko’s Silva I believe theyll give him Machida and He can put him to sleep as well.

by Colin D on Jul 9, 2008 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Collin: THis is where I loose all respect for u! So according to you, an average James Irvin is going to beat top 5 fighters Silva, and Machida in consecutive fights? U r obviously clueless about the sport!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am not understanding how the same people that hate Machida and his style are the Forrest Griffin Nut Huggers.

Once Forrest realized that he does not have KO power, and realized that he now has to fight against top competition, he fights totally different than his TUF and KOTC days. Stick and move and wait for the clock to run out. Did any of you see Forrest fight Hector Ramirezzzzzzzzzzzzz?

To put it simply, FORREST HAS TURNED INTO MACHIDA, but lacking the elusiveness part of it.

Comparing thier last fights…

Tito vs Machida. After the fight, Tito’s face was all busted up and he could barely stand. Machida looks like he was just done up for a Wal Mart portrait.

Forrest vs Rampage. Rampage had a little welt on the right side of his face. Forrest looked like he got mauled by a rather small lion.

by ViolentMike on Jul 9, 2008 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

VM: EXACTLY! I have been saying this since Saturday…Forrest has turned into a pooor mans Machida because everyone that he fights from here on out will have the serious KO Power…

So I dont understand how people can hate on Machida, but appreciate what Forrest did Saturday? It makes no sense, just shows peoples favoritism!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And to add to that, Forrest is no where near as skilled of a striker as Machida is.

Although, it must also be said that Forrest does engage more than Lyoto does. Machida is much more of a pure counterstriker.

by ViolentMike on Jul 9, 2008 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

First thing is Machida has not faced nearly as many aggressive fights as Forrest has. Also if Machida faces a counter striker like himself how will he do? I don’t care if the fight is boring or what not but I don’t think Machida can soundly beat a counter striker like say Chuck. Actually I don’t think Machida can even beat Forrest. Forrest has a more well rounded array of styles now, you can see he can brawl, counter strike and throw a mean leg kick. He’s evolving and learning the ins and outs of a fight. Just because he has to change his style to fight against hard hitters does not mean he’s become an elusive counter striker like Machida. That is all Machida does so what happens when he gets into a straight brawl? We really don’t know and how strong is Machida’s jaw? Do we have to wait for someone to hit it to find out. Look at it like this Machida may have a weird style of fighting but its always counter striking. Someone is bound to figure this out or just bull rush him. Stop complaining that Forrest doesn’t deserve to be where he is. Stop complaining that Machida deserves a shot over a proven champ named Chuck. Machida knows he’ll get his shot what does it matter that he has to face a top 10 competitor or a top 5 competitor before he gets the belt. It just means that he’ll have less of a chance to lose. Think about it, how many decisions can Machida win when he has to fight 5 rounds to defend a belt? Seriously Machida is a good fighter but I think he isn’t ready to be a long time champ yet. Niether is Forrest though or really anyone in the LHW division. There are to many guys with different styles, you’ll get beat sooner or later

by Smokes on Jul 9, 2008 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree Machida is gonna find someone to chase him and push him against the fence and throw a flurry of punches, WANDY, RAMPAGE, Machida is a small Light heavy wieght and if he is the only thing that stops Anderson from beating the top guys, Have them switch weight classes faaaack

by Josh on Jul 9, 2008 10:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe Forrest can find a way to expose Machida’s boringness and beat the guy.

by the_mexicutioner on Jul 9, 2008 10:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

All this crazy talk from everyone, fans and fighters alike, makes me wish for Forrest to hold the belt for a long time, beating everyone. NO, I don’t think that will happen. But it’s not Forrest’s fault that he came to fight and Rampage didn’t. Wow, so much disrespect is being shown to the guy who trained harder and had a better gameplan.

by chefdaddy on Jul 9, 2008 10:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Excellent comment. Everyone is hating on Forrest showing heart, working hard, and for winning in a flawed mma system. He won the 10 point must and showed the flaws for mma just like the BCS college football system. The fact of the petition going around shows such a lack of class in people its amazing. Take the loss, train harder, fight a contender, and get your belt back. Work for it don’t bitch about it. Reality checks and bad luck sucks.

by Kimber on Jul 9, 2008 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kimber: I have been complaining about the scoring system for years now. I think Pride system of judging the fight OVERALL is much better suited for mma!

Normally, I would agree that Rampage shouldnt deserve an immediate Rematch, but if they dont give it to rampage, they are just going to give it to Liddell who doesnt deserve it anyway, so it may as well go to Rampage.

The only way they shouldnt give Rampage a rematch is if they plan on giving the title shot to Machida or THiago Silva instead. If they plan on giving it to chuck, then I would say YES Rampage deserves it instead!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know John, I am starting to think they will give it to Machida. We all know how long it took Rampage to defend after Hendo. He even said after the fight he will never take a layoff that long again. Machida is ready now. If it is Chuck, we have to wait 6 more months. Maybe it is wishfull thinking but, Forrest isn’t hurt and Machida needs a fight.

by BNF on Jul 9, 2008 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they give it to Machida, I will not complain! Forrest vs. Machida wont be the fight of the year, but Machida is the most deserving and thats what it should all be based on, not who the UFC can Market the best.

I will have no problem with Rampage fighting his way back up to a title shot as long as they give the title shot to someone deserving like Machida. If they are going to give it to chuck in December, which is what they really want to do, then I will be very angry and would rather see Rampage get the rematch!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That doesn’t make any sense. Who has Machida beaten besides Soku that makes him worthy of a title shot? He couldn’t even finish an over the hill Tito who Chuck finished twice. Machida does not deserve a title shot over people who have been facing the top competition to deserve the title shot. Chuck was beating everyone down before Rampage and then he loses his belt in devastating fashion and faces a guy who he goes the distance with and loses a split decision. Give me a break I didn’t expect him to be the same following a defeat like that to Rampage. He came back and beat the guy who straight out dominated Rampage. Then he was going to face the guy Forrest beat to get his title shot. That fell through. Now he is facing an undefeated Rashad and he doesn’t deserve the title shot after that? Your telling me that beating Soku is better than beating Wandy? or beating Tito is better than beating Rashad? I know Lyoto is knocking on the door to a title shot but here’s how I see they should try to go with the LHW division.

Chuck vs Rashad
Wandy vs Rampage
Lyoto vs Thiago

All three of those fights would be for title contention
since Forrest just fought he wouldn’t be ready to fight Lyoto right away so its smart to have Lyoto and Thiago find out who the number one contende should be. Chuck is going to smoke Rashad in which case he would be the favorite going into the title fight. I think Forrest would lose to Chuck and Rampage would lose to Wandy making for a power rematch between Chuck and Wandy or another interesting match between the winner of Thiago Machida and the winner of Chuck forrest. I’d like to throw Rua in there but I’m not really sure what his condition is. All in all the UFC has the potential now to make some of the biggest fights in history and every title shot from here on out I predict will be a change or owner. The LHW champ is going to be changing for awhile.

by Smokes on Jul 9, 2008 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

YOur over the hill Tito Ortiz just beat Forrest and would have neaten Rashad, if he didnt grab the fence….so what does that say about the UFC light heavyweight champion? what does that say about Rashad, who chuck will get a title shot after4 beating…..U r a walking contradiction!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Get over it, we all know Chuck Liddell is getting that title shot if he beats Rashad. PLEASE PREPARE YOURSELVES for no whining, because you know it will happen. Besides, even if Chuck wins the tile back, think of the matchups…Chuck vs Wanderlei again? Rampage vs. Shogun or Wanderlei again? These are awesome! Let Machida get his shot after Chuck or whoever…Machida will get his shot, just not that soon unless they let him fight Forrest in a few months or so, but I think the UFC wants to milk the Forrest vs Chuck (student vs coach) thing. Plus Forrest is a marketable guy and like it or not is has alot to do with the matches.

by Chadx23 on Jul 9, 2008 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with John on this

by T_Saun77 on Jul 9, 2008 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s what I am talking about. I picked Forrest to win, he did and made Rampage look horrible in the process. Forrest has and will always have my respect. Did you hear there is a petition to get Rampage a rematch? It is just ridiculous…

by BNF on Jul 9, 2008 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chefdaddy-

Best post on this thread. Here come all the excuses for ’Page losing…

by OJR on Jul 9, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Machida is the future 205 lb champ, no question. But Yes, Chuck will get a shot before he will. If he beats Rashad, he is next in line. The UFC poster boy and Dana’s buddy. He had to be the happiest guy in attendance Saturday after Rampage lost.

by FukStyck on Jul 9, 2008 10:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

OMG if Chuck fights Machida for the belt it’ll be 2 counter punchers circling eachother for 5 rds, please god NO!!!

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LMFAO!!!!

by Ro-J on Jul 9, 2008 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no it will chuck getting his legs chopped down and finished off in round 4

by the heat on Jul 10, 2008 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am sure A. Silva would rather be boxing Roy Jones Jr. Sept 20th at Madison Square Garden instead of moving up a weight class as a “favor”. The UFC may have gotten a foot in the door at MSG if they allowed that boxing match to get set up.

by CAP on Jul 9, 2008 10:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Chuck deserves a shot at the title if he beats Rashad but what if Rashad wins who gets it then?

by Mike on Jul 9, 2008 11:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I wanted to qoute a well educated MMAFan in regars to UFC86 main event point of view on fight scoring:

Rampage landed 11 power shots to the head in round one, including a knockdown, while Forrest landed only 5. Power shots to the head are by far the most effective technique in MMA. No way that round should be scored for Forrest, no matter how much time he spent standing in the middle of the ring.

Round three was admittedly a lot closer, with Rampage landing 5 power head shots to Forrest’s 3. Forrest really did little other than land slapping leg kicks in that round, so the edge, again, should have gone to Rampage.

Rampage is a counter-puncher, and Forrest used that to his advantage by “pressing the action.” It was the same strategy that Jardine used against Chuck, except that Forrest actually landed fewer big punches than Jardine. When “controlling the Octagon” is worth more points than punching your opponent hard to the face, and being busy is more valuable than being effective, you are dealing with a deeply flawed scoring system.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 11:07 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Would you give it up already. HE LOST. Move on…

by BNF on Jul 9, 2008 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I accepted the lsot by now..but I will never accept the way the judges scored that fight. They F’d up.. and they can do it again..if given the opportunity..so I’m going to give it up.. I’m not a quiter.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am constantly hearing about how the judging was horrible. It was never supposed to make it to the judges, right. “Rampage by brutal KO round 1”. Why is no one talking sh!t on Rampage? He looked flat footed and slow. I wanted Forrest to win and am not a huge fan of Rampage. But if I was I would be pissed at Rampage, not the judges.

by BNF on Jul 9, 2008 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your right about Page not showing up.. but the decision was wrong. I think the scoring system they have is jacked up. Regardless if Forrest brought his best game and Page showed up with his JV game..the fight was a draw. should of went to a sudden death round.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had it the same way.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What BNF said is dead on the money. Its rampages fault for not finishing the fight. so everyone crying about the decision should quit crying. EVERY fighter knows what can happen when it goes to a decision. Thats why Rampage acted like a True champion saying Forrest was the better fighter that night.

by WickedAwesome on Jul 9, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that the scoring system is flawed in that sense.

by Spawn on Jul 9, 2008 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BNF: THe point isnt that Rampage lost! We get it, you are a fan of Forrest and u r happy that he won….The point is that something needs to change in the scoring system because it is extremely flawed. In General, I have always thought that the UFC scoring system put too much emphasis on Octagon Control and takedowns… how many times have we seen a fighter win a round with a takedown, but did nothing with it? It happens all the time and it needs to change!

Forrest won the fight! its a dead issue even though In my eyes it should have been a draw, but that doesnt change the fact that the scoring system needs to be tweeked. For example say Brock vs. Nogueira is taking place. Should Brock getpoints for taking Nogueira down to the ground, which is his world? Hell no! U should not get points for a takedown! The benefit of being in top position should be enough! no reason to award points for it as well. U should get no points for takedowns, u should be judged on what u do once u have the top position on the ground. THis is a fight, and the bigggest criteria should be DAMAGE!!!

As for the Octagon control, that is a load of crap. There are different styles, some people are counterpunchers like Chuck, Machida, so they will never really earn any Octagon control points, but they are fighting to their gameplan…..Should they be penalized for sticking to theior gameplan?

THis has nothing to do with giving the decesion to Forrest. THe point is that the system needs serious improvements, to ensure that we se more accurate decisions by the judges!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

John: this is the comment I left for Kevin yesterday for his daily conversation piece. This is what I think should happen with contenders. I think Chuck vs. Forrest will happen although I am not a fan of it. The reality is UFC wants its and all Chuck has to do is win. UFC and their wallets will win, not us fans. Read this and let me know what you think. We are one Rashad upset away from the true July 5th rematch though. Hope for lay and pray Rampage fans.

Comment by Kimber
2008-07-08 07:11:50
Kevin: idea for your daily conversation- the current LHW division set up and how it will play out.

IMO you would have to think it will be Forrest vs. Chuck on NYE since that will sell the most tickets and thats what the UFC wants. The next part is interesting. If you put Rampage against Wandy he gets a chance to avenge his losses which he wants or you put Rampage vs Machida for a #1 contender spot which will validate Machida or be the shortcut back to a title shot for Rampage. If Forrest pulls out NYE the you have the rematch early 09 or if Chuck wins you get Chuck vs. Rampage 3. Odds are Chuck wins NYE and gets his title back making him and Dana happy then if he gets murdered again he can retire. But if Rashad wins which he might all bets are off. Either way make Rampage vs. Machida/Wandy also on NYE so the next in line has the same time to recover and get the LHW division rolling again after all this damn time off.

by Kimber on Jul 9, 2008 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

John, that is exactly the point!!! He was your guys favorite. You all would not be complaining this much if Rampage won that decision. Even though some of you reluctantly admitted Forrest did win. If Rampage won you all would have won your money and been happy. You absolutly would not be bringing up these issues about changing the way all UFC fights are scored. And you cannot convince me otherwise.

by BNF on Jul 9, 2008 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was a BAD decision, or no one would be complaining, if Forest had won by brutal knockout, or sub, then no one would be complaining about it, if Forrest had rocked rampage/GnP’d him the majority of the fight to a decision then no one would be complaining. The fact is that it was a close fight, and many do not feel that Forrest won. So regardless of how YOU saw the fight, there’s enough people out there that definatley did not see it that way. I think if Rampage gets an immediate rematch it’s definatley a sign that the decision was suspect.

 Rampage did the majority of the damage in that fight, it’s lame to sit here and act like Forrest dominated him and deserves this landslide unanimous decision victory when that isn’t even close to the reality of what happened. Needless to say you even quoted up top “Rampage looked flat footed and slow” and he still rocked Forrest in just about every exchange. So if Rampage being “flat footed and slow” is the reason for Forrest winning that fight do you really believe he’s deserving of the belt?

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BNF, its funny, Rampage lost now all of a sudden there needs to be changes! LMAO!!!

by JV on Jul 9, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

are you guys mad, do the words octogone control, mean anything to you, you control the battle field for 5 rounds you win.

 I’ve watched it over and over and every time I lean more on griffen side.

by Ro-J on Jul 9, 2008 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Page fans:

Waaah, waaah, waaah…

by OJR on Jul 9, 2008 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had it scored a draw. Admittedly I did pick Rampage to win, but was rooting for Forrest. I had the fight scored 47-47, but knew they wouldn’t have scored it a draw, so I figured Forrest would get the Nod. I feel like the ten point must system is not the best system for scoring MMA and the criteria is somewhat off. Takedowns are scored too much even when the person on top doesn’t do anything with them. And so is moving forward as aposed to backward. Overall I still enjoy watching MMA and the judges do screw occationally. I feel no immediate changes are nessisary.

Good day!

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man are you guys even willing to consider the possibility that there is such a thing as a BAD decision??? If you honestly don’t believe the judge’s have never made a bad decision in the past then fine, but it’s a no brainer, it happens here and there. If bad decisions exist then it’s entirely possible that the scoring/decision on the page v forrest fight was a bad one.

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can’t help but agree with BNF. If the same fight played out in reverse, the Rampage fans would be making no noise about how the system needs to be changed or any immediate rematches.

by Jase on Jul 9, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong, if they would have given the decision to Rampage, I would be happy to have won my bet, but as a fan I would stil be pissed about the quality of the fight. I waited forever to see that fight and regardless of who won the fight we deserved a better fight then that.

Odamnhegotcaught: made a great point, u guys act like judges are always right. If Ram,page would have won, I would have still called BS because the fight was clearly a draw!

AS for the rule changes, WTF r u talking about, I have been making the same p[osts abiout rules needed to bechanged since I started blogging on this site…check the archives!

Kimber: u r right,….your whole scenariop is accurate. Hopeflly Rashad lays n prays his way to a win, to throw a monkey wresnch in teh Chuck vs. Forrest fight!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

JOHN: if you think fights should be based on damage, then you cant count Chuck’s loss to Jardine and Chuck should have won because did you see Jardine’s face/head/mouth after that fight? He was busted up…looked alot worse than Chuck’s pink side to me.

by Chadx23 on Jul 9, 2008 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chad did u see Chucks freaking legs, ribs and Back? He had welts all over his body from Jardine’s Kicks….Damage can be done to many other places besides the face..
u cant sit hear and honestly state that Chuck did more damage to Jardine, if you really feel that way, please just dont ever waste my time again by addressing me!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

WOW! John freeking owned you Chasx23. Totally owned you. Plus don’t forget the right hand Jardine dropped Chuck with. And also some guys just cut more then others. Look at Forrest, he cuts in eery fight, does that mean he lost them all?

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Forrest won that fight, he has the W in the history books. Forrest is the number 1 lhw in the world not rampage. Rampages nuts are getting sore from you hugging on to them so tight.

by Colin D on Jul 9, 2008 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure….and I personally don’t think Chuck should get it if he wins in Atlanta, but again he is the face of the UFC. One last title run for the Iceman.

by FukStyck on Jul 9, 2008 11:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machida will find it more difficult to get a title shot because the UFC can’t market him. Even when he finished sokodju, it was a snoozefest up until the last 20 seconds. The only thing worse than a 3 round machida fight would be a 5 round machida fight.

by Fidel Cashflow on Jul 9, 2008 11:15 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sad but true

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

how does rashad become a stepping stone to the title? he would of lost to a tito ortiz (the same tito everybody is bashing) had tito not cost himself the fight on points. and then he out pointed a mediocore bisping, who has yet to beat a top 10 lhw or mw.

and yet machida is undeserving? how many people go 5-0 in the ufc?

by mike on Jul 9, 2008 11:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rampage landed 11 power shots to the head in round one, including a knockdown, while Forrest landed only 5. Power shots to the head are by far the most effective technique in MMA. No way that round should be scored for Forrest, no matter how much time he spent standing in the middle of the ring.

Round three was admittedly a lot closer, with Rampage landing 5 power head shots to Forrest’s 3. Forrest really did little other than land slapping leg kicks in that round, so the edge, again, should have gone to Rampage.

Rampage is a counter-puncher, and Forrest used that to his advantage by “pressing the action.” It was the same strategy that Jardine used against Chuck, except that Forrest actually landed fewer big punches than Jardine. When “controlling the Octagon” is worth more points than punching your opponent hard to the face, and being busy is more valuable than being effective, you are dealing with a deeply flawed scoring system.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 11:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it belongs to Rampage… controversial decisions like that hurts the sport! this is why K1 and japanese organisations and when a boxer fights in his hometown the sport comes out like a big set up and looks real dirty…

by RoB on Jul 9, 2008 11:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

UFC is now torn between giving a title shot to a popular but IMO undeserving fighter in Chuck or to a non-mainstream but deserving fighter in Machida. They need to decide which fans base they want to impress.

Also didnt Forrest already say that he wants no part of Machida a few days before the Rampage fight.

by UKmmaBOY on Jul 9, 2008 11:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, he said that he would rather fight a list of other fighters, including Jason Lambert! Great Champion he is….lol, ducking Machida in favor of Jason Lambert….THat is ridiculous!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea its ok john, if Chuck fights Forrest he will KO him like Rampage was unable to do…then at some poin Rampage may KO Chuck again for the title.

by Chadx23 on Jul 9, 2008 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont want to see that…I want to see Forrest vs. Rampage with a clear cut decision…I already know what will happen when Rampage faces Chuck, I want to know what would go down if both Rampage and Forrest show up to fight…. Forrest couldnt even finish the champ and he looked about 50% of what he is capable of! GTFO here!

by john on Jul 9, 2008 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think forrest would find a way to beat machida on points, but i also think wandy could do it with a wicked finish, and jardine could outpoint him, but theyre honestly the only 3 smart enough to beat machida..

MAYBE rampage but if he couldn’t finish forrest he wont catch machida

by randy murders on Jul 9, 2008 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, I am shocked to hear the best finisher in the game give props to a guy that back pedals for a living. I absolutely hate what Machida brings to the fight. I know some people believe that you got to do what you got to do to get the W, but you still have to come in with intentions to beat the guy not outscore him. His plan coming into each fight is very straight forward(that’s kind of funny) stay out of range and score points by strikes from the outside……it is a strategy and it a winning one for him…….BUT THIS ISA NOT WHAT THIS SPORT IS ABOUT!!! this is about beating your opponent….I mean it’s just weak….I really hope that he changes his ways and I would like it to happen cause other fighters will refuse to fight him…..I really dont blame any fighter for refusing a fight with him. IMO even old school Koscheck Lay and pray is better then Machida’s “Kick and Run” method……He should train with Cung Le they have a similar tool set but look how awesome it is to watch Cung fight. I am not one to be all face smash, kill each other, but out of respect for other fighters and the sport you have to come in there to fight.

by e-brawler on Jul 9, 2008 11:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machida doesn’t run, he circles. He jumps backwards when someone strikes at him because, get this, HE WANTS TO DODGE THE STRIKE.

OMG, what a bitch, he should just stand in the pocket like a man. [/sarcasm]

When people compare Kalib Starnes to Machida, it’s just dumb. There’s a reason why a judge scored 10-8 rounds for Quarry against Kalib, and there’s a reason why judges keep giving rounds to Machida, time and time again. I know it’s boring to the casual fan, but for me, it’s great to watch because he has MMA down to a science.

by Pat on Jul 9, 2008 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

O well maybe instead of JUMPING backwards he could try DUCKING once and then staying in the pocket for an exciting exchange! There’s a novel idea..

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you think Forrest should do the same thing?

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depending on the situation, I mean seriously against Rampage, probably not the best idea, he probably did the best thing he could have, but Lyoto vs Tito?? Since when is Tito known as a knockout artist? He couldn’t stay in the pocket for one or two exchanges with Ortiz? Granted that Tito may have thrown 3-4 punch’s at most and then went straight for the takedown but it’s not like Machida wasn’t defending it well enough. He could have tried to put Tito away sooner than the end of rd 3.

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just as a side note, this guy just doesn’t take chance’s I really do think the Forrest comparison is bad, cause Forrest still gets in there and mix’s it up, he’s the kind of guy that will take a hit to give one, thats not Machida. He plays it safe every second of every fight, there’s no excitement, there’s no “what if” factor, he never lets all hang out, he never goes in for the kill. You know exactly what he’s going to do, be elusive, be the first to the take down for top control and outscore his opponent. It’s just in my eye’s he’s the old cliche, “fighting to not lose, not fighting to win”

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

forrest used to say he makes his gameplan based on geting hit and if they can KO him..

rampage dropped him so he did some elusive fighting, machida just runs like a school girl.. idk what would be more boring

machida vs rashad evans
machida vs chuck
machida vs forrest

haha rashad shouldn’t get a shot either he’s less exciting then machida cuz at least machida lands a shot or 2 a round and not lays on a dude dry humping him

i also think when irvin upsets anderson he fights thiago in a rematch to be inline for a shot which really sounds good

by randy murders on Jul 9, 2008 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, Pat. Machida might not always go for the kill as much as some would like, but for people to say he doesn’t show up to fight is downright ignorant, IMO.

by Jase on Jul 9, 2008 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where is Rashads respect? The guy is 9-0-1 in the UFC (if you count the wins on the show). And hes beaten Hoger, Imes, Bonnar, Lambert, Bisping, Salmon, Whitehead, Jardine. With a win over Chuck he should get the shot.

by EazyEismydad on Jul 9, 2008 11:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the winner of Chuck-Rashad will get the shot. It’s partly because they would be somewhat deserving, and also because either fight would be marketable. Chuck is always marketable, and I’m sure the UFC could easily hype up a title fight between 2 TUF champs.

by Pat on Jul 9, 2008 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That would make me vomit.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

An interesting point when you put it like that.

The thing is he is unpopular and boring to watch but that is a good record.

by Nick J on Jul 9, 2008 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree Rashad if he wins he should get the title shot. I am thinking from the UFC prospective Chuck, Wandy, Jackson or Machida will make more money for the UFC and all are deserving. I just want to see how the UFC will spin it if Rashad wins.

by Mike on Jul 9, 2008 11:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think that the real issue on this thread is what a BS fight the Silva/Irvin matchup is. If he is not going to challenge for the title, the only point of the fight is to cock block AFFL. Plus Chuck gets a very undeserving title shot if he wins? Boo.
-Lyoto should fight Forest in October.
-Rampage needs to avenge atleast one of his losses to Shogun or Wandy before he gets back in the mix.
-Thiago needs to fight a top five guy, Im just not sure who. Id rather see Page fight Wandy right now, Shoguns on the shelf, and Chuck is tied into the Rashad fight.

by efisher on Jul 9, 2008 12:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think they should have Lyoto vs. Thiago Silva. If they give Lyoto a shot right away, then Thiago should fight Jardine. He could fight Soko, but I’d rather see Soko-Shogun.

by Pat on Jul 9, 2008 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont find machida boring at all. i hope he gets to fight either chuck or page next i also hope t silva gets a top fighter soon.

by doomdoom on Jul 9, 2008 12:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sure Machida could win the belt by punching and running away and making him the second most boring fighter on the planet like Tim Sylvia but at least Tim Sylvia didn’t run from his opponents. Many Houstonians I’ve spoken with find Machida boring!

Brandon Vera was suppose to figth Machida in the next upcoming fight (Silva vs Irvin), but Vera chickened out. Probably thought Machida would run the whole time from him.

by CaptainAmerica1967 on Jul 9, 2008 12:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I still think BJ Penn could win a second fight against Machida if he didn’t run away so much from BJ during their first fight. BJ rocked Machida several times even when Machida was running away from BJ.

by CaptainAmerica1967 on Jul 9, 2008 12:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machida is the second most boring fighter after Tim Sylvia, but at least Sylvia would stand and fight and not run away something that Machida doesn’t know how to do.

by CaptainAmerica1967 on Jul 9, 2008 12:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather watch Machida’s elusiveness and counter-striking rather than Tim Sylvia hugging it out.

by Pat on Jul 9, 2008 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love Machida’s style, he’s like a cat in there. But, I have to agree that he is not yet worthy of a title shot let alone be named one in honour of accomplishments. Soku was a great win, but he didn’t have proven record and he’s still new to the sport, kind’a like Houston Alexander is.

I want to see Machida, fight Wand. Then we will know excactly where in fits in rankings.

by Ro-J on Jul 9, 2008 12:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You sound like a fairy.

by Colin D on Jul 9, 2008 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone needs to realize that it doesn’t matter who deserves the title shot. It will be decided by which opponent will sell the most tickets. Trust me, it will be Forest and Liddel on New Year’s Eve.

by Chainlink on Jul 9, 2008 1:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It is all about the money. Dana said that Silva had cleaned out the middleweight division and approached him about fighting at LHW. However, Silva says it’s the other way around. Now which do you believe?

by Chainlink on Jul 9, 2008 1:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why is Silva disrespectful for saying that the 205 belt belongs to Machida? That’s how he feels and there’s nothing wrong with that. Forrest admits he wants nothing to do with him, Vera ducked him, and he’s never been in danger in any of his fights.
Give Machida to Wanderlei and see if he rises to the challenge of an in your face animal. In the meantime, Rampage deserves the rematch, he didn’t get beat, so he doesn’t need to work his way back up. I’ll admit that Rampage looked like garbage and didn’t beat Forrest either, but the belt should not have changed hands in that manner. Chuck needs to fight Shogun or Thiago to prove he deserves a title shot.

by Josh on Jul 9, 2008 1:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you expect that Silva is being disrespectful.. Silva is just saying Machida..his boy should be next in line for a shot.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn’t implying that he was being disrespectful, I was questioning why people in here are taking it that way. It’s a bit silly to me.

by Josh on Jul 9, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Aight Josh.. now I get you bro.

by PhilQNY on Jul 9, 2008 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess beating Wanderlei isn’t good enough to earn just a little respect huh? Or having the second longest and most title defenses at LHW all winning by KO or TKO huh? Darn…what does a man gotta do to EARN some RESPECT!

by Chadx23 on Jul 9, 2008 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So many people are so very wrong on this thread.

First of all, the only reason Anderson stated his OPINION is because he and Machida are on the same fight team. Team Blackhouse.

Second of all, the UFC is not protecting any champs or would be champs. Rampage lost to Forrest, period. Lyoto stated his OPINION.

Lyoto is so high up on the contender list not only because of the quality of opponents he has faced but also because of his undefeated record.

Will people in here stop saying the first thought in their heads without thinking already?! Man, my head hurts.

Lyoto is not boring. Anybody who thinks so is a noob in the fight game and that is just the truth. If you dont see all the little things that Lyoto does to win, you don’t deserve to be criticizing him. Hit and not get hit is and always be the name of the game. Also, I think he gets quite aggressive when he has the advantage. Watch the Soko fight.

by bostonmmajunkie on Jul 9, 2008 1:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Then in my OPINION Machida is BORING. It doesn’t make me a “noob” just because I don’t like watching the guy fight, or should I say not fight. Are you gonna sit here and really honestly tell me that the shows he’s put on hold a candle to Huerta vs Guida, Wanderlei vs Liddell, Stout vs Fisher (Both of them), Couture vs Silvia or even Rampage vs Henderson. How about the original Forrest vs Bonner, hell both of those too, etc.. has the level of excitement in any of his fights come close to any of those??

 PLEASE. And we can leave the whole “he’s a skilled tactician” argument out of it. No one’s saying the guys a shitty fighter, or that he sucks and hasn’t fought good comp, I’m saying he’s BORING. I’m coming at this from an entertainment point of view. And he doesn’t entertain me. I watch his fights and I’m apathetic, I don’t care if he wins or loses. He doesn’t go for the finish, it honestly seems like his entire goal is to go out there and out point the other guy from start to finish, he’s not looking for a sub, he’s not looking for a knock out, he’s content to stay out of harms way, take absolutley no chance’s and go home with his decision. Nothing risked, nothing gained, and he’s not going to gain any popularity by just fighting safe.

 I think I posted above as well that the guy is cliche in that he’s “fighting not to lose, not fighting to win.” You wanna talk about an entertaining fighter, with great tactical skills and barely got tagged in fights? Talk about Roy Jones Jr. , talk about Anderson Silva, who else but Roy would put his hands behind his back against James Toney and then seconds later put him on the mat. Thats a bad ass right there, who else but anderson would just drop both hands in front of Rich Franklin and dodge with head movement alone. Thats a bad ass. Those two fighters made world champs look like chumps. Machida doesn’t qualify.

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its fair that you think Machida’s style is boring.

Don’t you notice though, that Machida gets aggressive and attacks when he sees weakness in his opponent? Did you see Machida/Soko? He hits and retreats/counters until he hurts his opponents then goes in for the finish. That is what I see and I don’t think he is boring.

Also, just the fact that you used the word “bad-ass” lets me know what kind of fan you are.

by bostonmmajunkie on Jul 9, 2008 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol, what kind of fan am I? Cause the entire undertone in all of your writing is condescending/arrogant and that definatley lets me know what kind of fan YOU are.

by O damn he got caught on Jul 9, 2008 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i hope machita leaves the ufc for that reason it will hurt the ufc bad the ufc is the new wwe for sure all marketing rampage fight proves it…

by joe on Jul 9, 2008 1:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Since when are Machida and Anderson butt buddies?

by Colin D on Jul 9, 2008 1:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They train together, the Nogs too. Just imagine those guys making each other better. Scary.

by Pat on Jul 9, 2008 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats disturbing can you imagine what their kids would look like……one word hideous

by Colin D on Jul 9, 2008 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Black House, scary camp!

by jsoph on Jul 9, 2008 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you serious Joe? How many UFC champions are unbeaten – 0! The UFC could easily hype Machida as their only undefeated champion, taking on all comers (those ballsy enough to fight him – even the current champ ducked him). Machida is marketable enough. And just how does the Rampage fight prove what marketing does – other than show how tough it is to win all your fights? Page is a monster – Just ask Chuck – and was well deserving of the hype. He lost, again showing just how impressive what Lyoto has done is.

by efisher on Jul 9, 2008 1:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machida is such a technician!… how can that not be exciting. Machida is exciting but in a different way!…. I think real hardcore fans should appreciate him rather than get on his back!

by UTD on Jul 9, 2008 2:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machida is the Winky Wright of MMA, great technician but way to saftey first.

by Seconds Out on Jul 9, 2008 2:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Great comparison.

by Pat on Jul 9, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice analogy. You obviously know your boxing…

by OJR on Jul 9, 2008 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

to be the champ you have to actually beat the champ not just being close fight anyways it makes look good for the ufc and their really show from season 1 to champion it sells watch the ultimate fighter on spike or what ever station it’s all marketing .

by joe on Jul 9, 2008 2:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machda is the most talented fighter in mma right now, i do think he needs one more big fight before he gets a title shot, but no one will fight the man, so he might just get it. I say Machida vs Wandy then give Machida his shot, that fight would tells us what type of Champ we could expect out of Machida and it would be bad ass fight!

by jsoph on Jul 9, 2008 2:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes im from England! Isnt it funny how Evans isnt rated as a fighter after the Bisping fight? (Bispings wrong division) you lot where saying Bisping would get ko’d by a head kick from Evans! He just won the fight against Evans imo but evans cuddled him for 2 rounds and got the win! i think you call it wrestling! Hamill and Evans were in his wrong division but there 2 good fights he had! Elvis? isnt that the same Elvis who gets shown in Forrest Griffin highlight real???? schaufer was coming of a win or win streak and that was his first fight! now he is stepping up in class its clear! so i say Leben won’t just get beat but he will get tko’d! what do you think “jsoph” so i can remind you after the fight? COTE IS A JOKE HE IS A BUM HE COULDNT GET OUT OF THE FIRST ROUND WITH BISPING! HONESTLY I DON’T RATE COTE HIGHER THEN JASON DAY! COTE IS AVERAGE! why waste time giving Cote a title shot if you put him in with Bisping you will see man against boy! as rogan says Cote will be on queer street!

by Tony on Jul 9, 2008 3:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

whatever im tired of aguring about bisping. you will see that dude isnt going any where i can see him dropping to 170 after he loses this fight thats the only place i see him going.

by jsoph on Jul 9, 2008 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you are going to love Griffin after his fight with Page, you have to also love Machidas game.. Both are technical and try to live by the ‘hit and dont be hit’ motto.. Griffin isn’t usually that way, but it was the way he “won” his biggest fight..

by DRE on Jul 9, 2008 3:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Jsoph i just wrote a big response to you and it hasnt posted! I can’t be arsed typing all that again! LEBEN R.I.P Cote the most overrated in UFC!

by Tony on Jul 9, 2008 3:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

tony !!!! Shit i dont evan care, leben and cote are not my favorite fighters so if they lose they lose, i was just trying to figure out why some one would defend such a disrespectful prick who is also the most overated fighter mma (ha) but your your from England so i hope your boy dose well, should be exciting.

by jsoph on Jul 9, 2008 5:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Disrespectful to who but Hamill? Hamill and him hated each other get over it! he said sorry he was pumped up after getting the win in a close fight against someone who called him out! If he is the most overrated fighter Leben should win then?

by Tony on Jul 9, 2008 6:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I hate you guys. I just can’t win this argument, can I? I’m throwing in the towel. It’s over, I’m not going to try to defend Machida any more. I’m making my official note of concession on this matter. I give up, I don’t feel like arguing a battle I can’t win. No one is going to shut up about this so I’m just plain quitting. I’m through arguing this with anyone anymore, OFFICIALLY.

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 8:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Should we call a whambulance for you? It sounds serious.

by Josh on Jul 9, 2008 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Way to add insult to injury

by DB on Jul 9, 2008 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cote is so overrated. Everyone saw it in the fight against almeida. Cote knocked out kendall grove…kendell gets ko’d easily, not that big of a surprise when you look at the body size. Cote did good against drew. But come on. Cote is saying he can knock anyone in the division with one punch. Bull****. Cote sucks and should have lost the fight. He def should not get the title shot after yushin okami. I mean he lost 4 in a row. Then won 4. He should fight a top 10 or 5 guy in the division. Then he will be exposed that he sucks and doesn’t have ko power with one punch…douchebag

by hamsterwheel on Jul 9, 2008 9:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Machida is so far the best LHW in the world it’s delusion to think otherwise. Machida Vs Rampage or Griffin, in the form they were both in at 86 would be a no contest…. AKA Machida would destroy both of them in the most efficent and pain free way….

Why is Cote getting a title shot with his record and yet Machida has to win fricking 10 in a row to get a shot….

I have so many issues with the current way the UFC are operating it’s not funny. I’m not saying the system is rigged but it is so skewed towards the most marketable and not the most talented it’s a joke. In most cases the American and Canadian fighters get all the breaks and all the opportunity’s and being a reader of this blog regularly i can see why. You guys can justify anything if a local boys involved but the problem with that attitude is that it threatens the credability of the whole competition….

It’s very frustrating…..

by Rilly on Jul 9, 2008 9:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

PUT MACHIDA AGAINST WANDY SILVA AND IF HE WINS THAT HE SHOULD GET A SHOT NXT SUMMER AGAINST THE CHAMP WHO WILL BE LIDDELL BY THEN.BISPING SHOULD FIGHT COTE NXT,AND HAVE ANDERSON SILVA FIGHT AT LHW .BJ PENN SHOULD MOVE UP WEIGHT,NOTHING TO PROVE AT LIGHTWEIGHT.
FIGHTS FOR 2009;
JOE STEPHENSON V NATE DIAZ
BJ PENN V GSP
DAN HENDERSON V FRANKLIN
A.SILVA V LIDDELL OR RAMPAGE.
LIDDELL V NOGUIRA

by STEVIE P on Jul 10, 2008 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone that is crying about how the page and griffin fight should have been a draw, or page should have got the dec. STFU plz plz, Here is my main point… DO NOT PUT THE FIGHT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGE’S….. It was a 5 round fight……… FINISH IT PAGE

by Outkast3380 on Jul 9, 2008 9:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow that sucks. I didn’t realize they trained together. So much for my idea for them to fight….

by RyanHobbs on Jul 9, 2008 10:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This post has too much about Machida in it – it’s putting me to sleep.

by theTRON on Jul 9, 2008 11:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

well boring fighters make for boring posts = /

by O damn he got caught on Jul 10, 2008 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

On the following Link, Dana White sayes that Lyoto Machida destroy Anderson Silva, and I don’t now if he is wrong or I missed that fight???

http://www.ufc.com/index.cfm?fa=HomePage.BuildHP

by Alejandro on May 21, 2009 9:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


UFC blog for news, results, rumors, fights and tickets
Start posting on MMA Mania »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.


Managers

Mmamania_small MMAmania.com

Tomcat_small Jesse Holland

Authors

Small DrubySunshine

Small James Iannotti

Small Derek Bolender

Small Akimitsu Kuwabara

Adam_bomb_small Adam Wagner

5650_129573216991_634971991_3014476_3537245_n_small Nate Lawson