MMA Mania: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Can Tebow Say No To Anything?

Randy Couture: 'I've got no beef with Dana' White (Video)

0 recs  |  Comment 70 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

then what the hell is the problem now randy? i’m starting to loose all respect for randy, by the time he fights again it will be to late. then whoever beats him is going to get all this hype cause they beat him, but who did they beat? a 50 y/o fighter who hasn’t fought in a year or more big deal

by myke on Apr 29, 2008 10:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow Mike. I can’t believe you’re only just starting to lose respect for him. I agree with assessment of beating the 50 year old fighter.

by chefdaddy on Apr 29, 2008 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I did catch the tone in the Karo comment chef, was just laughing cause Karo sucks, but might very well win a few and get a shot, who knows, but no one will beat GSP until BJ moves up, hopefully NYE show

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I posted this on another thread late last night, but if you missed it, I suggest taking 5 minutes of your day to view this Ultimate Cung Le Highlite reel….There is some amazing footage in it! Enjoy:

Mania, I want you to check it out as well!
Here is the link: http://www.myvideofight.com/video/other-rings/cung-le-fight-reel/index.html

by John on Apr 29, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kenny Florian vs. Roger Huerta will go down at UFC 87 in August! The fight contracts are close to being signed!*

by john on Apr 29, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That old guy was hilarious. I’m glad to hear he has no beef with Dana. Still, even outside of the UFC, I dont think the Fedor vs Couture fight will happen…at least in the near future

by Dayvet on Apr 29, 2008 10:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Randy is 100% correct, he has no beef, just an unhonoured contract.

by UKmmaBOY on Apr 29, 2008 11:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Enough about this honoring his contract crap already.
You don’t like your pay at your job UK? You’ve got a choice. Quit and get another one. Nobody cares. Take care of yourself.
Upset you can’t see Couture vs Nog? Close your eyes and imagine this- It goes five rounds, Nog gets beat up, submits Randy before the final bell. What a suprise.
Couture/Fedor is the fight that holds all the hype. So what if Couture wanted out of the UFC.

by jess on Apr 29, 2008 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know how contracts in the UK are but here in the US, but I know Alex Rodriguez couldn’t just resign from a contract because he wants more money and then go and sign with the Red Socks. If you want a UK analogy, Wayne Rooney couldn’t just resign from his contract with Man U and go to Chelsea because he was unhappy with the pay. If you are under contract, you must honor it until it is complete. If not, you get sued.

by Eric on Apr 29, 2008 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

many of the top athletes can opt out of their in baseball

by billybongthorton on Apr 29, 2008 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eric- Sorry I wasn’t clear, I was responding to UKmmaBOY, not comparing to the UK.
In response to your statement, at least ARod can play against the Red Sox. They are connected within the same league. Salary and pay is competitive within baseball itself. The UFC says, “we got you, and as long as you remain HW Champion, your exhisting contract is renewed automatically at the same rate. If you have a fight left on your contract and choose not to renew, we’ll just bench you until the time period lapses on the contract”. It’s a pretty crummy deal in my opinion, and with the way that the UFC treated Andrei Arlovski by sitting him out for over a year until the time period on his contract was up was pretty ridiculous. And just becouse AA wanted to become a free agent.

by jess on Apr 29, 2008 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No they can’t. You are talking about ‘player options’ and that is basically at the end of a contract so the player can either take the money that is his to choose or get out and try to get more. Stupid comparison, Billy.

Eric, excellent comparison. Randy took his a** out of retirement and got a gift contract from a friend (let’s not forget he and Dana were on good terms when he got his money and undeserved title shot). He did well, let his new “buddy” agent in his head (who played him like a fiddle), and walked out on an agreement. That is what a contract is. If he didn’t want it, he shouldn’t have signed it.

by PJJ on Apr 29, 2008 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another example: If Chad Johnson sits, he doesn’t earn a year toward free agency, i.e. if you don’t honor your current contract, you don’t get a shot at a better one when it’s over. How is this different from Randy? It’s not.

by BobC on Apr 29, 2008 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I want Randy to fight Fedor like every MMA fan out there, if Randy WANTS the fight get in the Octagon fight your opponent, finish your contract and then fight Fedor anywhere. Its almost a year now that this has been dragged through the system, Randy could have fought, lost as you predict, healed any injuries and we would now be counting down to the Fedor fight.

What he signed is LEGAL & BINDING, its not crap, its whats stopping the dream fight.

by UKmmaBOY on Apr 29, 2008 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only reason the contract was not made with UFC was that UFC wishes to retain ridiculous ownership over their fighters (e.g., Fedor couldn’t do the Russian combat sambo). Dana acts like he did Randy this huge favor, when Randy sells the tickets. People that don’t watch UFC are interested in and willing to pay money to watch Randy. So in reality, even after the losses to Chuck, it wasn’t a real big favor. Now Dana talks about “bitch slapping” Randy’s agent, and what Randy so doing is “pussy shit.” Walk into a closed door room with him, lock it up, and the person that walks out under his own power wins. Bottom line, UFC can make this fight, and it’s the fight everyone wants to see. Randy has one or two more fights in him, or maybe none. But he’s been around a long time and fought everyone, so wanting to fight Fedor over Nog ain’t asking too much.

by Den on Apr 29, 2008 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

UKmmaBOY- the UFC does not let go of its champions. Contracts are automatically renewed. Fedor fight would not have happened if Randy stayed. And hype would have dwindled if he lost. It might not happen anyways.

by jess on Apr 29, 2008 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know this, but so did Randy. I agree with your comments about Fedor and UFC wanting ownership of fighters but this is typical of every aspect of business. Ford or Microsoft or Nike will always want total control of their respective products as will the UFC. The difficulty with this case is that BJ, Pulver, Shamrock & Bustamante all retired as Champs and new Champs were crowned. Was this before or after Zuffa purchased UFC? I wasn’t following MMA at this time so will have to plead ignorance on this, I just want it resolved so Randy, UFC and the fans can move on.

by UKmmaBOY on Apr 30, 2008 5:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who care about randy vs fedor. All this bs buildup for a fite that mite or mite not happen so boring. This is where mma is turning into boxing. Just shut up and fite already. I’d rather watch two guys on tuf fighting it out b/c they’re hungry unlike these guys that just want to prove who’s #1. They think they’re bigger than mma but guess what?? THEY’RE NOT!!! The sport is still going on and we still get to see great fights all the time (except when Starnes fights).

Randy do us all a favor and either just retire and go away or settle it in court. He’s turning to the roger Clemens of mma.

by AJ on Apr 29, 2008 11:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I know a lot of guys are sick of Randy, but he’s really just an advocate pushing for better pay for younger guys! He is really doing a good thing by trying to get fighters as well as organizations to realize there is more money as well as bigger fights out there than exclusively UFC. If Dana could see this (which I believe he does, but doesn’t knoow what to do) then mma fans would start getting some super fights. Thing is it’s just a handful of guys Dana can’t sign and another handful he can’t resign, so he doesn’t need to see the big picture yet.

As far as Kurt Angle…what a joke. I truly hope Randy drops him on his head and gets rid of this douche once and for all!

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 11:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Since this is just a grappling match, what would it do to the prospects of a Fedor/Couture match if Angle won? He may wrestle in WWE, but he was an Olympic Gold Medalist. Just asking, although I would love it if Kurt put a whoopin’ on him.

by chefdaddy on Apr 29, 2008 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he was an olympic wrestler…not submissions..Randy would beat him in under 2 minutes.

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re kidding yourself by thinking Angle can’t hang with Couture grappling. His level of wrestling and talent displayed in wrestling is higher than Couture’s. He has done submission work for years but hasn’t jumped into MMA fully because he knows his striking is way behind. Despite the WWE label, he is a real athlete that understands athleticism and knows what it takes to compete at a top level.

by PJJ on Apr 29, 2008 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you’re talking about this guy? Whatever…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIT6UnBiu-I

WWE feeling the pinch so now they’re faking mma lol.

by ognitinoc on Apr 29, 2008 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is interesting though. Kurt on “Inside MMA.” Mentions he is training, and would be ready in 6 months. Still I’ll believe it when I it, could just be all talk.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YCLWgp69qg

by ognitinoc on Apr 29, 2008 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

randy an advocate for younger guys? randy is just looking out for randy, don’t kid yourself. I hope he looses the battle in the courts, because if he wins than it will leave a precedent that anyone can just quit in the middle of their contract and go somewhere else. there is a reason we have contracts in the world, and if you’re in a contract you should honor it. what a great role model he’s become, let’s just teach our kids that a contract is just a piece of paper that doesn’t mean anything and you’re not liable for it.

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand how contracts work, but to not let certain companies sponser you, or trying not to allow you to make a living outside of the UFC is ridiculous. Yes, these guys could just not sign (like FEDOR), but they got to work. Randy is going about it right, he could have easily gone to Russia and fought fedor, what could zuffa do then? nothing. he wants to prove a point and I’m convinced absolutely set a precident for younger guys

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He can’t take a fight with Fedor because he’s still under contract with the UFC. if that happened, two things would come out of this:

One; UFC would sue Randy for fighting for another organization while under UFC contract.

Two; UFC would sue the organization Randy and Fedor fought under because Randy is still under contract to UFC.

That’s the reason Randy won’t all the sudden fight Fedor, he can’t.

Now you’re right about not letting some companies sponsor randy or allow randy to corner some of his fighters in other promotion is just dana being a d*ck. But just because I lost respect to Randy doesn’t mean I agree with everything Dana does.

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if he fights in russia, who can sue? UFC has no authority in russia

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ummmmm, hello? They can sue Randy since he would be the one breaking contract. They may not be able to sue another organization for promoting it, especially if it is a foreign org, but the man they have the contract with could be held liable.

by PJJ on Apr 29, 2008 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

they can sue an organization in Russia, international litigations happens everyday. Not so long ago the UFC filled law-suit against the previous owners of Pride, and vice versa.

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He can fight in Russia, he can earn money in Russia, but if he brings it back here, the UFC can take it. Also, the IRS will hold him liable for the taxes on the earnings regardless of where they are earned, so even if he makes his money in Russia and takes it to the Caymans, he’s still liable for the taxes.

by BobC on Apr 29, 2008 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok my bad

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kevin, you’re wrong about it being ridiculous for companies to control who sponsorships come from. As far as I know, every single major sports league in the world does that.

by Michaelthebox on Apr 29, 2008 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe they control it to an extent, but you really think the nba cares what sneaker a guy endorses? As long as it’s relevant…is the condom depot more relevent than a clothing line??

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

why lose respect for randy when all he is doing is exercising his self respect and not wanting dana and the ufc to own him and tell him what he can and cant do in his last days of competition. he’s at the end of the road and he’s made dana white and the fertitta bro’s far more money than he’s made himself while working for them. people should have all the respect in the world for this guy for standing up for himself, bucking up against the powers that be, fighting the system, something a lot of people are too coward to do in their everyday lives

by duece 4 on Apr 29, 2008 11:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Because some of the bloggers on here believe that if you don’t play the game like they think it should be played, you suck.

Those bloggers believe that they should have control over fighters’ personal career moves.

Lastly, they also make a logical leap by assuming he’s dishonoring a contract as if they’re a judge, have a law degree and the contract in hand.

by rhv on Apr 29, 2008 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you’re right rhv, I’m no judge but a 4 fight contract to me doesn’t mean 2. stupid me! Now if you’re taking randy’s side about the duration of months in his contract than of course you have a point and a judge needs to decide, but the bottom line is that he signed up to fight 4 times and only fought twice, he’s a honorable man that randy… (sarcasm)

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t know (none of us do) what a 4 fight contract means.

Does it mean you must fight 4 fights in the UFC regardless of the outcome?

Does it mean you must fight as many times as the UFC asks you to fight up to 4 times?

Does it mean both fighter and the UFC can decide to fight any number of fights up to 4?

I don’t presume to know the answer but many bloggers on here do. You need the contract to state this definitively and even then, it needs a judge to interpret it.

by rhv on Apr 29, 2008 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

“You don’t know (none of us do) what a 4 fight contract means.”

- it means you fight 4 times.

“Does it mean you must fight 4 fights in the UFC regardless of the outcome?”

- not really, the ufc can release you from you’re contract depending on your performance, as we’ve seen twice this week.

"Does it mean you must fight as many times as the UFC asks you to fight up to 4 times?"

- yes

"Does it mean both fighter and the UFC can decide to fight any number of fights up to 4?"

- no, ufc can decide, couture can’t (this is Ultimate Fighting Championship, not Extreme Couture Championship, it’s the UFC that holds more power than the fighter, as it should.

"I don’t presume to know the answer but many bloggers on here do. You need the contract to state this definitively and even then, it needs a judge to interpret it."

-the only hole in this contract is the duration which is what randy is going for, the judge will need to interpret this, but as far as a 4 fight contract, it means 4 fight contract. There is no way around it. The only thing the judge will interpret is if the duration of the contract that expires on September (I’m not sure if it’s September) will automatically cancel out the remainder two fights that Couture owes the UFC. Couture received 500k as bonus to sign the new contract, at the time he was old. He signed to fight four more times. He beat Tim and he was old. He beat Gonzaga and he was old. Now he says he’s too old and only has one fight left, but he’s been old forever now. He knew how old he was when he was signing the contract with the UFC to fight four more times, and he did not honor it. I’m far from what someone would call a UFC lover, in fact I hate Dana, but I agree with him on this. Couture should just man up and take care of his responsibility. Even if he wins the court case (which I really hope won’t happen), he has lost the respect of many including myself because he won’t honor his contract.

A murderer could go to trial and be declared not guilty by a judge or by his peers, but that doesn’t mean he’s innocent.

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s say everything you say is 100% true and accurate. We still don’t know what a 4 fight contract fully means.

Does a 4 fight contract expire or is it indefinite?

This is civil (contract) law not criminal law. This has to do with the interpretation of a contract. There is no guilty person/party here, liability is decided not guilt.

If we all had a copy of the contract it would be possible to have an informed opinion. Since this isn’t possible, instead of having an uninformed decision, I prefer to give Randy the benefit of the doubt and reserve my judgment until a judge looks into the matter.

by rhv on Apr 29, 2008 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

rhv, the problem we’re having in this debate I believe is that we’re really talking about two separate things. I’m only explaining why I’ve lost respect to randy and you’re trying to defend that randy might be right in the legal department. I replied first to duece 4 explaining why I’ve lost respect to randy, in my own judgment you don’t just sign a 4 fight contract when you’re retired and came out of a loss in one division and all of the sudden you have a title shot because you asked for it and receive $500k ahead as bonus before any fights takes place. Then you win that title and only defend it once and all of a sudden there is no one worthy of fighting anymore besides fedor… That to me really took the wind out of my gut, I used to respect Randy more than anything but he made a 180° and lost all the respect I had.

You can wait to find out if a judge sees it his way or the UFC way before you make a judgment yourself, but all I’m saying is he’s already lost the respect of many such as myself and we don’t need a court ruling to make up our minds. Just because something may be uplifted in court doesn’t mean its right. Randy is the one who signed the contract, why should I feel sorry for him? He’s an adult, he should know what he does and he should be responsible and liable for everything he does and all the decisions he makes.

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HE SIGNED A CONTRACT! THEREFORE HE OWES THEM THE FIGHTS!!!!! IF HE DIDN’T WANT THEM TO CONTROL IT, DON’T SIGN ON THE DOTTED LINE!!!!!!!

by GOAT on Apr 29, 2008 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t even play the video. I no longer care what Randy has to say.

by Anonymous on Apr 29, 2008 11:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey mania, are you guys working on site again? It’s pretty slow today, at first I thought it was my end, but all other sites I go to are fine?? just curious!

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 11:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, sorry. Tweaks. Should be perfect in the next week or so.

by MMAmania on Apr 29, 2008 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you guys doing anything substantial to affect posting or just stuff on your end?

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t sell yourself short, Mania. You"re perfect now.

(Free T-shirt?)

by PJJ on Apr 29, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol free t shirt

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

RHV…you are assuming that he isn’t dishonoring his contract as if you have a law degree and the contract in hand. I am not saying one way or the other…I will admit I do not know because as you stated…I am not a lawyer and I do not have the contract in hand…but for you to say all these people are wrong is the same thing as them saying Randy is wrong.

by Andy on Apr 29, 2008 12:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The contract is in dispute. I never said he is honoring or dishonoring it. I merely pointed out that some people are making an illogical leap by stating he’s dishonoring it. (Maybe he is, maybe he isn’t?)

Aside from that contract dispute is the whole issue of Randy not deserving any respect and that is a matter of opinion.

Given that we don’t know whether he’s dishonoring a contract or not, I think we should give him the benefit of the doubt. The guy has done too much for the sport to not do so…

by rhv on Apr 29, 2008 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have a beef with Dana. Scrap that crappy TUF TV show so we can see the champs defend their belts on a regular basis. Only Silva seems to be the guy that fights every 4-5 months. People say that TUF made the UFC mainstream and accepted as a sport. To people that knew nothing about MMA that is true. But as a long time fan of MMA i feel cheated out of seeing fighters defend their belts more than once a year. Mainstream doesn’t necessarily mean good. Nick Lachey is mainstream and he sucks.

by SpiderStyle on Apr 29, 2008 12:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think they should scratch the whole TUF show, they just need to stop putting champions as coaches. They should just get two big names as coaches and be done with it. I agree that taking a champion and putting him on the shelf because of the show is the most ridiculous thing ever.

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously, Tito vs. Ken was a great season of TUF with no Belt involved. So was Pulver vs. Penn. The grudge matches seem to work better on that show anyway.

I’ve got it.

Season 9 of The Ultimate Fighter:
Lutter vs. Starnes

by DonnyG on Apr 29, 2008 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL, that would be a classic fight, Starns that won’t stop running against Lutter that will gas running after Starnes.

by linx on Apr 29, 2008 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lachey has f*cked Jessica Simpson, give him some props!

by UKmmaBOY on Apr 30, 2008 5:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really have no idea how so many fans of mma somehow now disrespect randy and love dana white.

I mean come on, when you really come down to it, who seems more honorable. you’ve seen countless interviews with both. who seems like the guy with the integrity. i don’t care what you’ve heard because they’re each telling different stories. who’s the guy who’s going to nickle and dime you and who’s the guy who’s going to treat you with class?

Couture’s the good guy, every day of the week.

by JZ on Apr 29, 2008 1:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

good point.

Any way you slice it, Randy has done way more for the sport than all of us bloggers and fans combined.

Now he gets in a contract dispute, and people think he sucks… Only a few level-headed fans actually have enough aptitude to logically be able to put things in perspective.

by rhv on Apr 29, 2008 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t get me wrong, I like Randy, the disrespect imo comes from, how good is he really. Everyone bashes Serra (which I get) but what is Randy’s record? He wants a dream fight with Fedor (which I think he’d wiin) but can’t get it done. If Timmy beats Fedor (which again I think he can) the whole Randy/Fedor fight loses its luster. I think Randy should suck it up and fight nog, and pray fedor wins!

by kevin on Apr 29, 2008 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great post JZ, none of us know the details, but like you said, we know the character of the two. Randy is the honorable one. It’s a no brainer.

by Gord on May 10, 2008 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You gotta respct that from randy a real classy guy and a real human down to earth man not a overhyped fighterr for no reason like alot of the fighters today but a classy deserving fighter that should receive nothing less but respect …..cant wait till your next fight i’ll be pulling for you!

by ORTIZ!!!!!!08....BABY! on Apr 29, 2008 1:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t blame the UFC for making there fighter sign the contracts that they do. The UFC puts up all the money for all the stuff it takes to sell the fights. Then you have pussies like Kalib Starnes that do what he did, That makes the org. look bad, and can cause new fans to not buy or watch again. All the fighters have to do is show up and fight and there paycheck is garranteed, the org. is the only one that is not garranteed to make there money back. So why should the UFC let there fighters appear in other orgs?

by JV on Apr 29, 2008 1:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

cant wait to see scorpion king 2 randy looks awesome in it in that stupid fuckin costume hes wearin

by jaja biggs on Apr 29, 2008 1:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I want Randy to choke out all of you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Brian on Apr 29, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Randy would not lose to minatauro, he would beat him up for 5 rounds to a decision and not be submitted. He wouldn’t make a mistake like Tim did.

by Clintjack on Apr 29, 2008 2:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yup that’s about right… The way things are going this thing will be tied up in court for a long time… win or lose… Couture loses either way.

by THORAZINE on Apr 29, 2008 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

undercard for timmy vs. fadeor should be opie vs. anthony.
anthony has a strong ground game, but opie has heavy hands and an awesome takedown defense. would be a definite ratings grabber for the nobody gives a crap network, which is exactly where all randy coture interviews belong until he honors his contract, gets back in the cage and fights already.

by jeff the drunk on Apr 29, 2008 2:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Chuck would knock the shit out of Kurt angle…….I know kurt wouldn’t stand a chance but I would still pay good money to see chuck or Randy beat him senseless…….

by Homeslice on Apr 29, 2008 2:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

GOOD KNIGHT!!! I totally thought it would be sorta safe to watch this at work. That old man almost got me in trouble dropping the F Bombs. hahahah I looked like Gollum huntched down in my cubicle reaching for the volume.

by xAustinx on Apr 29, 2008 4:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree only to a certain extent about honoring contracts, but should the ufc honor their contracts as well, or should they have the right to call a guy and say your dropped? Should be the same for both.

by knowitall on Apr 30, 2008 12:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting on MMA Mania »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images1_small
THE WINTER OF OUR MMA DISCONTENT IS OVER
Us_small
McArthur's 2010 MMAMania Fight Pick'em Pool - UFC 110 Round 5 - and Round 4 RESULTS
Securedownload_small
MONDAY MORNING BLACKBELT
9144-lesnargsp_small
The Undercards Season One Episode 2 RESULTS
2481649810100752951s425x425q85_small
Getting to Know Mania

Recent FanPosts

Andreina-samudio-3_small
Akihiro Gono, Yoshihiro "Kiss" Nakao, and Henry "Sentoryu" Miller added to Sengoku 12
Mmamania_small
Gray Maynard still not upset about being passed over for title shot against BJ Penn (Video)
Mmamania_small
UFC 110 video trailer: Going 'Down Under' for 'Nogueira vs. Velasquez' on Feb. 20
Techno-viking_small
WEC Quick Quote: Urijah Faber plans on fighting the best guys in the sport regardless of division
Techno-viking_small
Tom Lawlor vs Tim Credeur on tap for UFC 113
Techno-viking_small
Martin Kampmann out, Jake Ellenberger in against Ben Saunders at UFC 111
Mmamania_small
Minotauro Nogueria: Cain Velasquez is not a good submission fighter (UFC 110 video)
Mmamania_small
UFC prospect Phil Davis eager to get 'back in the lab' after winning Octagon debut
Mmamania_small
UFC Undisputed 2010 video game announcement from Dana White
Phish_small
Fantasy Light Heavywweight Tournament Quarterfinal #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mmamania_small MMAmania.com

Tomcat_small Jesse Holland

Editors

Small James Iannotti

Andreina-samudio-3_small Akimitsu Kuwabara

Adam_bomb_small Adam Wagner

Techno-viking_small James Kimball

Authors

Small DrubySunshine

Fedorsweater2_small Derek Bolender