UFC 75: Rampage situation 'lose-lose' against Henderson (Video)
Joe Rogan also breaks down the championship main event later today:
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
Huh? I’m trying to figure out the connection between the title, and the vid.
Looking forward to the fight though.
by jess on Sep 8, 2007 11:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Huh? I’m trying to figure out the connection between the title, and the vid.
Looking forward to the fight though.
That’s what I was thinking.
by ufc get Fedor on Sep 8, 2007 12:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s what I was thinking.
What you guys aren’t mind readers? I posted the wrong video. Should be good in a few. Apologies.
by UFCmania on Sep 8, 2007 12:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can’t wait – it’ll be a great fight!
Whooo-hhhoooooo!
by Nhoj on Sep 8, 2007 12:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure if I agree with that. Henderson just knocked out the guy that beat Rampage twice, so if Rampage can win and win decisively I think he’ll be making a big statement.
Rampage is turning into sort of a pessimist as of late though, don’t you think? He’s complaining about fighting Dan, and he was complaining about the prospect of fighting Chuck again.
Not exactly a warriors mentality. Maybe we need to change his nickname from Rampage to Quinton “Cry-Baby” Jackson.
by Tim on Sep 8, 2007 1:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I want Henderson to win so Wanderlei can comeback and whoop his ass for the title :o)
by KTATAU on Sep 8, 2007 2:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wandy has to beat Chuck first. I think whoever win the forrest/ shogun will get the tile shot. Chuck cannot over look jardine. Rampage will win tonight…
by cmac on Sep 8, 2007 2:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure if I agree with that. Henderson just knocked out the guy that beat Rampage twice, so if Rampage can win and win decisively I think he’ll be making a big statement.
Rampage is turning into sort of a pessimist as of late though, don’t you think? He’s complaining about fighting Dan, and he was complaining about the prospect of fighting Chuck again.
Not exactly a warriors mentality. Maybe we need to change his nickname from Rampage to Quinton “Cry-Baby” Jackson.
I disagree. First, each fight has its own set of circumstances (ie. style matchups, rules, fighter condition, etc…) so this fight is fairly removed from Rampage’s fights with Wandy.
Also, his complaints are fairly valid. He has just shocked the world and now he has been put in the position to help someone make history. Rampage won’t be taking Dan’s belts if he wins. Rampage is way too big to ever be considered a middleweight.
When Rampage fights either Wandy or Shogun, then he will have something to gain; Redemption.
by Mahde on Sep 8, 2007 3:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. First, each fight has its own set of circumstances (ie. style matchups, rules, fighter condition, etc…) so this fight is fairly removed from Rampage’s fights with Wandy.
Also, his complaints are fairly valid. He has just shocked the world and now he has been put in the position to help someone make history. Rampage won’t be taking Dan’s belts if he wins. Rampage is way too big to ever be considered a middleweight.
When Rampage fights either Wandy or Shogun, then he will have something to gain; Redemption.
Actually I thought they were going to unite the two titles? I just assumed pride had different weight requirements for middleweight…
by diddy82 on Sep 8, 2007 10:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bad breath would be a good tactic in the clinch.
by marshal on Sep 9, 2007 1:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i would fight joe, he could commentate too. he wouldbe tellin me what to do next,
> he looks like he could get a go go palata"
and id be like “thanks joe”
and the next thing yu know joe’s out and i win!!!!
by HeadKnock on Sep 9, 2007 2:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not exactly a warriors mentality. Maybe we need to change his nickname from Rampage to Quinton “Cry-Baby” Jackson.
What do you have to say to the light heavyweight champ “OF THE WORLD” now , you little shit?? page dont have to fight chuck again anytime soon, he beat him twice! and as far as him not thinkin he should have had to fight hendo, he is right. dont get me wrong hendo is a great fighter, but he is great at 185, and only good at 205. Page needs great 205 opponants.
by HeadKnock on Sep 9, 2007 2:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
“Who’s the winner?” Bisping asked British fans…The judge who got paid off to give the fight to him. Who are the real losers? Any fan who thought that this fight wasn’t fixed! There is no way Bisping was the winner and to be so arrogant after some judge who lacks character literally GAVE the fight away just adds insult to injury. For the commentators to even interview him as a winner is a sad commentary in itself. The results of this fight shows that some odds maker and some TV executive gave away more than the exchange rate of US dollars compared to the British Pound (2 GBP to 1 USD), and that’s about how you’d have to do the scoring in order for Bisping to come out the winner…Hamill has overcome a hearing challenge to become a very competitive fighter, now it seems he also has to overcome the eyesight of some judges as well. This is so sad…
by Like@SailSD on Sep 9, 2007 2:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What a joke!
Hammil clearly beat Bisbing…….he was freakin’ robbed!
How could one judge have it 30-27 for Hammil and the others give it to Bisbing???
That was a joke!!!!
Bisbing’s mom and grandma must have been the other two judges.
by Hammil was robbed on Sep 9, 2007 3:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
People can say what they want but this fight was set up but
just wasn’.t as noticable as boxing. I have watched Hollywood fight many fights. Since when does a wrestler with the skills of Danny try to stand with Ram. If the percentages were kept up with on punches dan probally landed about 5%. At the same time a super star wrestler can’t get a person with very limited ground skills off him. What about when Danny had Ram in the Camora and let it go come on. He was about 2 seconds from twisting it and ending the fight. This is all BS
by Randy on Sep 10, 2007 10:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












